Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Have to say, honestly, I like the old shot better. The old shot says the Enterprise is the star of the scene... in the new one the Enterprise almost seems incidental. YMMV.
I think it's the composition of the space shots that are lacking in TOS-R.
This is not even remotely credible.
Interestingly, I looked back at reaction to the D7 in the episode in question online a few days ago and the only two places I saw negative reviews were here and on Trekmovie. Almost every review site, blog, media story gave the FX and Klingon ship in the episode high marks. So again I have to chalk up the result here to bias.
RAMA
You really do have a tough time with the concept of personal opinion, don't you? I'll never understand your need to run out and find others that agree with you. If the new effects had been universally panned, would you then think they weren't any good? Make your argument based on what you see on the screen not what other people think.
Some of the new effects work (mainly the matte extensions), some don't (a lot of the space shots)... in my opinion. People here are sharing their opinions on the work. We're all different and we all have differing expectations.
Live with it.![]()
I don't have a problem with personal opinion, but the new shots I posted were so much better even a 2 year old would have been able to notice.
RAMA

Excuse me, but even if the energy beam is moving somewhat slower than light there's no way in hell she's going to sidestep it particularly at what is effectively point blank range! Give me a fucking break! And note that Kirk is accelerated and not his phaser---how come no one on the bridge noticed a phaser beam coming out of nowhere???