So, is this how it works?...an author (or wannabe author, or their agent; however it is you maneuver around the slush pile) registers a story idea with S&S or Paramount or whatever grand poobahs are in charge of such things, and then you are allowed to roll with it to turn it into an actual manuscript subject to further review, is this correct?
No, it's not like that at all. You don't "register a story idea," whatever that means. Story ideas are a dime a dozen; countless people come up with the same basic idea independently of each other all the time. Remember, the threat of lawsuits doesn't mean that the charges are in any way legitimate. They're utter and complete BS coming from people who don't understand how the creative process works, who fail to realize that story ideas by themselves are not unique things, that what makes a story is the
execution, not the concept. The problem is that, even though the mentality behind the lawsuits is foolish and ignorant, the lawsuits themselves are still a costly nuisance that can harm the ability of publishers and writers to do their work. It's grossly unfair, but it's the sad reality of the system.
What you do is submit a pitch or an outline -- not just the idea, but
how you execute it. That's what makes something a story. If the pitch is approved, then you get a contract. Sometimes an established author will get a contract before a pitch has even been submitted or accepted. But there's no "registration" involved. The contract specifies that it's a work-for-hire arrangement, that CBS owns your story and everything in it.
At this point, does the publisher step in and let their legal department handle any plagarism claims? Or do they just let you handle all of that if it comes up?
I'd have to review the contract to be sure of the details, and I'm not sure it's really my place to talk about a publisher's business and legal practices. As I've already said, if you really want to know more about this, you shouldn't ask me, you should do some research of your own and find more reliable sources. I know that we have to avoid unsolicited story ideas like the plague, but that doesn't make me an expert on the whys and wherefores of it.
Perhaps it could just be a editorial dictate that each book try to explore a member world even if in a subplot. Watching the Clock really isn't a book about Delta, but I felt it really explored the Deltans more than I've seen elsewhere.
That would be a terrible idea. Compulsory creativity? The results wouldn't be satisfying or worthwhile. A story works if the writer is inspired to tell it, if it's something they really want to explore. Forcing every writer to include some obligatory element in everything they write would be unfairly restrictive to them and would result in inferior work. And it would make the line boring and formulaic. The strength of Trek Lit in the past decade or so has been its diversity.
I explored the Deltans in
Watching the Clock because it's something I've always yearned to do. If I'd been ordered to do it and hadn't been inspired, the results would've been much weaker.
5. Publish Slings & Arrows in TPB.
That'll happen eventually, after the remaining
Corps of Engineers installments are collected.