That was rich!
![]()
That was rich!
![]()
Contextless post is contextless.
I thought I recognized him! Completely forgot that he was Mark's father, but in retrospect, it was cool to see him play an older version of his son.The big thing that happened earlier on, of course will prove to be retconned/worked around sooner or later. Nice to see W Morgan Sheppard in DW (and his son, of course).
Wow, that's some fascinating insights, and unlike some Christian analogies I've seen in shows and movies (like a certain Doctor Who finale), it didn't feel forced or obvious. I didn't think of it myself but now I see it completely.A bunch of us were looking at the Easter references in the picnic scene. It takes place on Good Friday 2011.
The leader, knowing that he is going to die gathers his friends around him where they share a meal (at the lakeside - very Biblical). He makes a comment about 'I thought I'd never be done with saving you'. Specific reference is made to his drinking wine (he never drinks wine, apparently).
He then goes a little apart from his friends, asking them to watch, and instructing them not to interfere with whatever happens. An individual comes, and he gets killed. (Suggestion that he is betrayed by one of his friends? - is the child in the suit River Song, who is jailed indefinitely for killing a good man?)
There follows a conversation about Saturdays being temporal tipping points (this broadcast on Holy Saturday) and they land on Easter Tuesday (two days after Easter) in 1969.
Are we heading for a resurrection on a Sunday?
I think the problem is that Moffat and others kept raging about how scary and creepy they were, so we went in expected to be scared and crept out.The Silence...I dunno, they should be scary but they're just not...probably didn't help that my gf giggled at their rubbish tentacle hands...the notion of them is very intriguing though.
Ah, yes! The whole visual of the mysterious astronaut pointing seemed familiar. Thank you for the reminder.I had a bit of a B5 vibe as well, but considering I watched War Without End today that might not be surprising...
As Starkers pointed out, "War Without End" has a similar mysterious astronaut that keeps popping up. Considering how at least three people made the connection, don't you think you're overreacting just a tad?In what possible sense does a space suit based on the suits worn on the Moon by NASA's astronauts in real life remind you of Babylon 5, a series made fifteen years ago set three hundred years in the future that we have no reason to think Steven Moffat has even seen?Also the space suit stuff reminded me of Babylon 5.
That didn't bother me because I've seen a lot of rural areas use school buses to transport people.1.) Why did Amy and Rory ride in on a school bus? lol, that didn't make any sense. Surely they would have rented a car, or rode a public bus, not a school bus heh.
Actually, something else about this scene bugs me but can easily be corrected in a future episode. The guard says that she's done this on multiple occasions but I'm hoping it's not suppose to be a reference to "Time of the Angels" but rather some future episodes of her appearances.2.) That prison must not be a good one that River is in, she keeps being able to break out of it easily. Think they would have learned their lesson the last time.
Although, are they going to have Amy's narration about the Doctor just before the credits of every episode? Seems a bit unnecessary, Doctor Who has never needed a narration in the opening credits, and I don't see why we need to start.
The Doctor said that the Chameleon Circuit works but the TARDIS always picks a Police Box.So, what does everyone think of turning off the TARDIS engine sounds again, and being able to make it invisible?
I could buy the cloaking thing, IF the chameleon circuit was working properly, but the whole point of the chameleon circuit is that it blends in with the surroundings without needing to turn invisible! So that's kind of weird. I think a lot of new whovians don't even know that the TARDIS can turn into anything depending on where it lands, or at least is supposed to be able to. It's like why make the darn thing turn invisible, it already has a unique feature.
I also don't like them being able to turn off the engine sounds, that's like a key integral part of Doctor Who.
Do you think that they were members of The Silence?Twice whilst in the TARDIS, Amy calls out to someone off screen then seems to forget them.
So, what does everyone think of turning off the TARDIS engine sounds again, and being able to make it invisible?
I could buy the cloaking thing, IF the chameleon circuit was working properly, but the whole point of the chameleon circuit is that it blends in with the surroundings without needing to turn invisible! So that's kind of weird. I think a lot of new whovians don't even know that the TARDIS can turn into anything depending on where it lands, or at least is supposed to be able to. It's like why make the darn thing turn invisible, it already has a unique feature.
I also don't like them being able to turn off the engine sounds, that's like a key integral part of Doctor Who.
Yeah, invisibility is a bit much. After all the times where the Doctor has parked the TARDIS away from the front lines so as not to attract unwanted attention and he could have just cloaked it?
Sorry, I'm not buying it. Besides, I thought with the perception filter, it was as good as invisible?
Apparently, the new opening credits with Amy's narration is a BBC America thing. I quite like it, actually.Although, are they going to have Amy's narration about the Doctor just before the credits of every episode? Seems a bit unnecessary, Doctor Who has never needed a narration in the opening credits, and I don't see why we need to start.
So, what does everyone think of turning off the TARDIS engine sounds again, and being able to make it invisible?
I could buy the cloaking thing, IF the chameleon circuit was working properly, but the whole point of the chameleon circuit is that it blends in with the surroundings without needing to turn invisible! So that's kind of weird. I think a lot of new whovians don't even know that the TARDIS can turn into anything depending on where it lands, or at least is supposed to be able to. It's like why make the darn thing turn invisible, it already has a unique feature.
I also don't like them being able to turn off the engine sounds, that's like a key integral part of Doctor Who.
Yeah, invisibility is a bit much. After all the times where the Doctor has parked the TARDIS away from the front lines so as not to attract unwanted attention and he could have just cloaked it? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Besides, I thought with the perception filter, it was as good as invisible?
I don't mind silencing the engines, since it's just a call back to the joke about leaving the brake on which itself continues the joke about the Doctor being a horrible pilot.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.