I always hear people say this, but is there actually any evidence of it? I have never yet heard anything that proves to me this is actually the case rather than just a viewer's rationalisation for why they didn't like it. Point me to somewhere this is actually said by someone involved with the show, and I might believe you.It's too bad the series didn't work out as planned, where Walsh was the Big Bad and Adam was just her henchman. The actress quit the show halfway through the season leading to her abrupt death.
Similarly - what? I have never heard anything to this effect, and I flat out don't believe it. The fact is that the Mayor was being threaded in at the end of season 2, with reaction shots from Snyder that suggested how unpleasant he was, so he was already being built up as the Big Bad of season 3 that early. In fact, Buffy made a habit of suggesting the next year's Big Bad during the current year every single season.Mr Trick was supposed to be the Big Bad in season 3, but the Mayor was more fun to them, so they adapted.
Trick was used to distract the viewer with the thought that he was probably the Big Bad, so that the Mayor creeping up on us wouldn't be so obvious. But that is not the same thing as Trick actually being intended as the Big Bad all along.
Another thing people always say. But I can't help notice that all the episodes people hold up as examples of Buffy's brilliance come from after the high-school era. "Hush," "Restless," "The Body," "Once More with Feeling"... every one of them after high school. It took breaking out of that restrictive high school model for the show to really reach the heights it was capable of.But also Buffy worked best in High School
That last point is exactly what makes it perfectly fine with me. I like when the characters are feeling the same things the audience are about the events happening on the show - it makes the whole thing feel more realistic.It was a transitional year from the high school years, to what the show became later on. Of course the transition will feel kind of awkward. It was awkward for the characters, too.
For example, I would have been happier with Voyager if they had actually addressed in plots and dialogue that Janeway had a tendency to be inconsistent with her decisions, or that Chakotay had become a useless seat warmer. But they just carried on unheeding of their own issues. You cannot ever claim that Buffy is guilty of that.
Oh, they'd been at it a lot longer than that. Look at Angel season 5 episode "Why We Fight" - an organization known as the Demon Research Initiative was up and around in the '50s.After all, they started up new military units to deal with supernatural threats not all that long after, showing they hadn't really learned anything...
Yeh was a little deus ex machina for me but it did give us that wonderful and WTF finale episode- oh and that Cheese Man.
And this is another thing that always gets on my tits. Why is it a deus ex machina to combine the Slayerettes into a combo-Buffy? The final solution to any season-long arc is never revealed until the season finale - and usually until about 10 minutes before that solution is used. So why does this one get flack?The deus ex machina ending didn't help.
The fact is that this situation is exactly what the entire season had been building to. The character arc of the season had been about the Scoobs splintering as group - finding new groups to hang out with, keeping secrets from each other, not being the close unit they were. Adam was the perfect counterpoint to that - a creature who was literally made out of the parts of other people. That's why combining the four Scoobies into one unit was vital thematically to the season - bringing them all back together again both literally and figuratively because they're stronger together than apart.