The artist at Filmation gave poor ol' Mr. Kyle red hair and a big handlebar moustache, iirc.
I acknowledge the validity of your assertion reference the writers directive - I'm sure you could provide a credible link if asked. I apologise if you found my language in anyway contradictory or insufficient, but...^You're contradicting yourself. First you acknowledge I'm right that the show was NOT "aimed at children" -- and then you reiterate that it WAS "aimed at children." Make up your mind already!
It's one thing for you to say that it feels like a children's show to you. That's a subjective opinion and can't be argued with. But when you use the phrase "aimed at children," that is an assertion of the creators' intent. So for you to stipulate that that wasn't the creators' intent while continuing to use that specific choice of words is completely contradictory.
I believe I've made my opinion quite clear, but I'm sure that won't prevent you from continuing to pick apart my every word in order to prove my irrationality and contradictory ramblings!LOKAI of CHERON said:it is still my opinion the show was aimed at children
Well, news flash, YOUR OPINION IS WRONG!
When I first heard the title “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” for me it conjured images of the children of the original crew now having their own ship and own adventures.Star Trek themed Kid's Show?..
Look here..
![]()
The artist at Filmation gave poor ol' Mr. Kyle red hair and a big handlebar moustache, iirc.
Ratings - wise, does anyone know if TAS was considered a success/failure?
I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.
Ratings - wise, does anyone know if TAS was considered a success/failure?
I don't mean to offend the posters who were introduced to Trek through TAS as kids in he 70's but creatively, I'd have to call it a disappointment overall. Sure, there were two or three gems, and my three year old loves it, but it's not a patch on TOS.
I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.
The series won the 1975 Emmy in the category of “Outstanding Entertainment - Children's Series.” Other nominees in the category were General Hospital, Jeopardy!, Baretta, and The Godfather Book II.
When I first heard the title “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” for me it conjured images of the children of the original crew now having their own ship and own adventures.
YThe show ran from 1972 to 1985
Richard Arnold did.I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.And, even then, all the ST Office tried to do was stop the novels and comics from referencing TAS in the licensed tie-ins. There was a fear that the tie-in products weren't using the parent shows (TOS & TNG) as the canonical source. RA attempted to stamp out the licensees (Pocket, DC Comics and FASA) increasing practice of sharing original characters and ship designs.
But then, Filmation was also being liquidated in 1989 - and DC Fontana and David Gerrold were contesting GR in court over co-creatorship of TNG, so you can understand if GR's lawyers were advising him to distance himself from TAS. (There was recently a thread on this.)
They were setiing it aside, not erasing TAS from existence.
Hell, Bill Cosby was half of the voice cast all by himself.
This was Filmation's only hit series on NBC. The eight other shows (The Secret Lives of Waldo Kitty, Archie/Sabrina Hour, Young (Space) Sentinels, Fabulous Funnies, Batman & The Super 7, Kid Super Power Hour With Shazam, and Sport Billy) lasted one season or less. The New Adventures of Flash Gordon lasted two seasons. The animated series was, according to the Nielsen ratings, not popular enough with young children. According to series' producers it was intended to be enjoyed by the entire family. Although the accuracy of the ratings system conducted by the ACNielsen company has been vehemently disputed by its supporters and detractors since their first implementation, these results have been cited by fans and critics as justification for the show's brief run of only 22 episodes. However, in the 1970s, very few animated series went beyond a few seasons as it was usually more profitable to start a new series. The series did receive critical acclaim and a Daytime Emmy award, the first such award for the franchise. According to both Roddenberry and an NBC press release, this was the justification for six additional episodes being ordered by the network for the series' second season.
The series won the 1975 Emmy in the category of “Outstanding Entertainment - Children's Series.” Other nominees in the category were General Hospital, Jeopardy!, Baretta, and The Godfather Book II.
The Godfather, a children's series? That just goes to show how little faith you can place in award shows' nomination categories.
Were there ever any thoughts of a third season of TAS?
Actually, it probably did the show a big favour - I find Majel Barrett and Jimmy Doohan's voices to be a bit overused as it is - it would have been a lot worse had they attempted to do Uhura and Sulu as well, as was planned.
Beware relying on Wikipedia for facts, but some more info from this Wikipedia entry for TAS :
This was Filmation's only hit series on NBC. The eight other shows (The Secret Lives of Waldo Kitty, Archie/Sabrina Hour, Young (Space) Sentinels, Fabulous Funnies, Batman & The Super 7, Kid Super Power Hour With Shazam, and Sport Billy) lasted one season or less. The New Adventures of Flash Gordon lasted two seasons. The animated series was, according to the Nielsen ratings, not popular enough with young children. According to series' producers it was intended to be enjoyed by the entire family. ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.