• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TAS... Sigh

Ratings - wise, does anyone know if TAS was considered a success/failure?

I saw it for the first time about five years ago - it was bittersweet, watching and thinking this will be my last 'new' TOS.

I don't mean to offend the posters who were introduced to Trek through TAS as kids in he 70's but creatively, I'd have to call it a disappointment overall. Sure, there were two or three gems, and my three year old loves it, but it's not a patch on TOS.

I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.
 
^You're contradicting yourself. First you acknowledge I'm right that the show was NOT "aimed at children" -- and then you reiterate that it WAS "aimed at children." Make up your mind already!

It's one thing for you to say that it feels like a children's show to you. That's a subjective opinion and can't be argued with. But when you use the phrase "aimed at children," that is an assertion of the creators' intent. So for you to stipulate that that wasn't the creators' intent while continuing to use that specific choice of words is completely contradictory.
I acknowledge the validity of your assertion reference the writers directive - I'm sure you could provide a credible link if asked. I apologise if you found my language in anyway contradictory or insufficient, but...

LOKAI of CHERON said:
it is still my opinion the show was aimed at children
I believe I've made my opinion quite clear, but I'm sure that won't prevent you from continuing to pick apart my every word in order to prove my irrationality and contradictory ramblings!

Well, news flash, YOUR OPINION IS WRONG!

The series won the 1975 Emmy in the category of “Outstanding Entertainment - Children's Series.” Other nominees in the category were General Hospital, Jeopardy!, Baretta, and The Godfather Book II.


Star Trek themed Kid's Show?..

Look here..

4379940597.jpg
When I first heard the title “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” for me it conjured images of the children of the original crew now having their own ship and own adventures.
 
Ratings - wise, does anyone know if TAS was considered a success/failure?

Sadly, unless an animated TV series gets gangbuster Saturday morning ratings, the formula used to employ the voice cast becomes unwieldy after two seasons. TAS got average ratings. The TV stations noticed that reruns (of any animated series) rate the same as new episodes, so why keep churning out new ones - but then that particular cohort of kids also moves on to other things. Notice that even the well-received, highly acclaimed "Batman" animated series of the late 80s/early 90s re-kick-started itself every few seasons with a title tweak, new opening music, character additions, costume/design changes, etc. - essentially starting the episode count from scratch again, mainly to keep the accountants happy.

I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.

Richard Arnold did. ;) And, even then, all the ST Office tried to do was stop the novels and comics from referencing TAS in the licensed tie-ins. There was a fear that the tie-in products weren't using the parent shows (TOS & TNG) as the canonical source. RA attempted to stamp out the licensees (Pocket, DC Comics and FASA) increasing practice of sharing original characters and ship designs.

But then, Filmation was also being liquidated in 1989 - and DC Fontana and David Gerrold were contesting GR in court over co-creatorship of TNG, so you can understand if GR's lawyers were advising him to distance himself from TAS. (There was recently a thread on this.)

They were setiing it aside, not erasing TAS from existence.
 
Ratings - wise, does anyone know if TAS was considered a success/failure?

Well, it got a second season (of six episodes), which is more than a lot of Filmation series did. Back then, it was pretty standard for a Saturday morning show to just make one season and rerun it for a few years, and if it stayed on in reruns long enough, it might get a crop of new episodes every several years. (I think Fat Albert had new episodes about every fourth year, give or take.) So I figure TAS must've been okay.

I don't mean to offend the posters who were introduced to Trek through TAS as kids in he 70's but creatively, I'd have to call it a disappointment overall. Sure, there were two or three gems, and my three year old loves it, but it's not a patch on TOS.

Sure, it doesn't have many real standouts, but it was a noble effort to continue the series, I think. I mean, if you compare it to other '70s or '80s animated sequels/spinoffs to live-action shows, it's atypically faithful to the original. I mean, Hanna-Barbera gave us a Happy Days cartoon spinoff where Fonzie travelled through time with "a future chick named Cupcake" an a Partridge Family cartoon that basically plugged the Partridges into the world of The Jetsons. Filmation sometimes made similarly great departures in its adaptations, like The Brady Kids, which dropped the adults from The Brady Bunch and sent the kids on wacky adventures with a bunch of talking animals, one of which was a wizard. But it also did a number of very faithful adaptations. Filmation's Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle was more faithful to the original Edgar Rice Burroughs novels' concepts and mythology than any prior screen adaptation of Tarzan and just about any subsequent one, and its Flash Gordon (at least in the first season, before it was dumbed down) was a lovingly faithful adaptation of Alex Raymond's comic strips. TAS was done in the same tradition of fidelity to the source.

So in the context of its time and format, TAS was an atypically faithful continuation of the original, and about as good a continuation as we could've expected. I give it full credit for that.

I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.

Late in life, Roddenberry got very picky about what was and wasn't true to his vision, and largely excluded stuff that he wasn't personally responsible for. He questioned the canonicity of some of the movies, and even considered some of TOS to be apocryphal.


The series won the 1975 Emmy in the category of “Outstanding Entertainment - Children's Series.” Other nominees in the category were General Hospital, Jeopardy!, Baretta, and The Godfather Book II.

The Godfather, a children's series? That just goes to show how little faith you can place in award shows' nomination categories.

And of course most anyone back then would've assumed a cartoon was a "children's series" even if it was written to be suitable for adults, because there's long been a pervasive prejudice that any cartoon is automatically for kids. But that doesn't make it true.


When I first heard the title “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” for me it conjured images of the children of the original crew now having their own ship and own adventures.

Yeah, that was always kind of a problematical title for a series that was set several generations further along.

Interesting to imagine what that might've been like, though. Say, Captain Peter Kirk, his first officer Saavik, Dr. Joanna McCoy... Hmm, since TWOK gave Scotty a nephew (even though that was cut), maybe another nephew or niece could've been created... (I won't include Demora Sulu, since that character hadn't been created yet when TNG was developed.)
 
You can look at Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids as a good example of how the networks did cartoon programming. The show ran from 1972 to 1985, but according to Wiki, there were years they didn't produce a new episode:
  • Hey, Hey, Hey, It's Fat Albert — November 12, 1969
  • Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids — 1972–73 (22 episodes), 1975–76 (14 episodes)
  • The Fat Albert Halloween Special — October 24, 1977
  • The Fat Albert Christmas Special — December 18, 1977
  • The New Fat Albert Show — 1979–81 (24 episodes)
  • The Fat Albert Easter Special — April 3, 1982
  • The Adventures of Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids — 1984–85 (50 episodes)
(Total: 110 episodes + 4 specials)

I wish the animated episode had had that run!
 
Yeah, most Filmation shows only had one season's worth of episodes, sometimes two, even if they ran for several years. Fat Albert was exceptional in its longevity. I think Shazam! had three seasons.
 
I seem to recall Roddenberry going out of his way to erase it from existence in his later years.
Richard Arnold did. ;) And, even then, all the ST Office tried to do was stop the novels and comics from referencing TAS in the licensed tie-ins. There was a fear that the tie-in products weren't using the parent shows (TOS & TNG) as the canonical source. RA attempted to stamp out the licensees (Pocket, DC Comics and FASA) increasing practice of sharing original characters and ship designs.

But then, Filmation was also being liquidated in 1989 - and DC Fontana and David Gerrold were contesting GR in court over co-creatorship of TNG, so you can understand if GR's lawyers were advising him to distance himself from TAS. (There was recently a thread on this.)

They were setiing it aside, not erasing TAS from existence.

Richard Arnold was pretty much left to run amok by Roddenberry and the others because RA was willing to take care of stuff, like licensee stuff, that they didn't want to mess with. Unfortunately, this gave the glorified gofer a sense of authority to which he really wasn't entitled. And since he apparently had a bug up his posterior regarding TAS in the first place, Roddenberry's directive to not reference it gave Richard all the justification he needed to announce from Mount Olypmus that TAS was OUT!!

To the best of my digging, the WGA grievances from Fontana and Gerrold didn't really play any part in the whole thing; it was at best a sideshow. The Filmation mess would've been enough all by its lonesome to keep TAS out of play.
 
Hell, Bill Cosby was half of the voice cast all by himself.

Not quite half. He was Albert, Bill (of course), Mushmouth, and the recurring character Mudfoot, plus the Brown Hornet in the later seasons (which I didn't like as much, but which are the only ones available on Hulu). So only three of the eight central characters.

And IMDb says the cast didn't change over the course of the series. But I do recall the names in the closing voice credits having some differences in the later seasons. Maybe it's just that the early seasons had an incomplete cast list, or maybe one or two of the performers used different names at different times (a number of Filmation contributors used pseudonyms). Or maybe the cast did change and IMDb's information is incomplete. Some of the characters sound different to me in the later episodes. Maybe it's because they were played by young actors whose voices changed as they grew up between seasons?
 
They also might not be doing the voices the same way. If there was a big interval between tapings, sometimes it's not all that easy to find that character voice again.
 
Thanks, all, some great info here.

Were there ever any thoughts of a third season of TAS?

Beware relying on Wikipedia for facts, but some more info from this Wikipedia entry for TAS :

This was Filmation's only hit series on NBC. The eight other shows (The Secret Lives of Waldo Kitty, Archie/Sabrina Hour, Young (Space) Sentinels, Fabulous Funnies, Batman & The Super 7, Kid Super Power Hour With Shazam, and Sport Billy) lasted one season or less. The New Adventures of Flash Gordon lasted two seasons. The animated series was, according to the Nielsen ratings, not popular enough with young children. According to series' producers it was intended to be enjoyed by the entire family. Although the accuracy of the ratings system conducted by the ACNielsen company has been vehemently disputed by its supporters and detractors since their first implementation, these results have been cited by fans and critics as justification for the show's brief run of only 22 episodes. However, in the 1970s, very few animated series went beyond a few seasons as it was usually more profitable to start a new series. The series did receive critical acclaim and a Daytime Emmy award, the first such award for the franchise. According to both Roddenberry and an NBC press release, this was the justification for six additional episodes being ordered by the network for the series' second season.

Worth mentioning Nimoy's incredibly selfless act of refusing to sign on for the show unless Nichelle Nichols, George Takei and Walter Koenig were included. Good on him :techman:

Actually, it probably did the show a big favour - I find Majel Barrett and Jimmy Doohan's voices to be a bit overused as it is - it would have been a lot worse had they attempted to do Uhura and Sulu as well, as was planned.
 
The series won the 1975 Emmy in the category of “Outstanding Entertainment - Children's Series.” Other nominees in the category were General Hospital, Jeopardy!, Baretta, and The Godfather Book II.

The Godfather, a children's series? That just goes to show how little faith you can place in award shows' nomination categories.

:facepalm:

I was joking. The other nominees were Captain Kangaroo and the Pink Panther.
 
Were there ever any thoughts of a third season of TAS?

IIRC, there was a slim possibility of a further six new episodes, plus reruns to fill out the season. Contractually, the cast would have received significant jumps in salary, breaking the budget.

I seem to recall an interview with Howard Weinstein ("The Pirates of Orion"), in which he said he had a pitch approved for a script for a potential third season. This may have become the kernel of one of his future Pocket novels.
 
Actually, it probably did the show a big favour - I find Majel Barrett and Jimmy Doohan's voices to be a bit overused as it is - it would have been a lot worse had they attempted to do Uhura and Sulu as well, as was planned.

Nichols did a lot more than just Uhura. Also Takei had a hilariously awful turn as a cloud thingamajig in Megas Tu.
 
Beware relying on Wikipedia for facts, but some more info from this Wikipedia entry for TAS :

This was Filmation's only hit series on NBC. The eight other shows (The Secret Lives of Waldo Kitty, Archie/Sabrina Hour, Young (Space) Sentinels, Fabulous Funnies, Batman & The Super 7, Kid Super Power Hour With Shazam, and Sport Billy) lasted one season or less. The New Adventures of Flash Gordon lasted two seasons. The animated series was, according to the Nielsen ratings, not popular enough with young children. According to series' producers it was intended to be enjoyed by the entire family. ...

To provide some context, though, keep in mind that this is only referring to Filmation's NBC shows. Most of their shows were on CBS. And the Batman & The Super 7 show on NBC was actually a revamping of an earlier CBS show called Tarzan & The Super 7 (both were packages of various half-hour and 15-minute Filmation adventure series in an extended block), so the overall Super 7 ran longer than that paragraph suggests, and included individual segments that had longer runs.

But those last couple of sentences are telling. TAS was "not popular enough with young children." Not surprising, since it wasn't aimed primarily at them. (Although I was 5 years old when I started watching, and I liked it just fine.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top