I'm sure the plot will be shit, but I might see it if it's in 3D. Yes, I realize many people think 3D is a gimmick and even a distraction from the plot, but I stand by my belief that, for these movies, a distraction from the plot would probably be a good thing.
If they do this movie in 3D I'll give it an ounce or two of worthy thought. Unlike most movies that have came out since
Avatar made 2 Trillion dollars at the Box Office being in 3D two Decembers ago I suspect these proposed
Matrix sequels will be filmed with 3D in mind and it will be done with the best possible outcome attempted.
Most of the movies that have came out over the last year or so were
converted to 3D in post-production. And while this "can work" for animated movies or CGI elements in movies (as it's not much more than telling the computer, "Oh by the way, there was a camera here, too" and the computer knowing what that camera would have seen) the live-action, "in camera" elements are going to suffer from the "Colorforms Effect" where the 3D stuff has to pretty much be faked as there's no way to know what the imaginary second camera would have seen. That's how most of the 3D live-action movies the last year have been done, they've been done in a computer, cheaply and quickly which cannot produce as quality of a 3D image is
actually filming a movie in 3D with two cameras.
Now it is "possible" to fake the process with computers but it is time consuming and expensive but, IIRC, it's the route Cameron wants to go on the 3D versions he wants to do with
Titanic and
T2. But even last-minute converting a movie (like I believe they did in Toy Story 3) can produce a good "depth of view" picture it lacks that gimmicky "stuff sticking out at you" thing many in the drooling masses like. (Because if there's one way people like seeing the fourth wall broken it's when something flies out of the screen, the imaginary world, and at you through the theater.)
Anyway, I suspect that these
Matrix sequels will be filmed with the 3D element in mind so it'll produce a good looking experience. I, for one, hope they go for the "extreme, vast, depth" that Cameron used in
Avatar and not the gimmicky "sticking stuff through the camera" stuff so many movies latch onto. I want to be
immersed into the movie world as if I'm looking through a window into it. Stuff flying at me through the movie screen doesn't accomplish that.
But, considering I've got as much faith in the Wachowskis to do
anything right as I have in my in-grown toenail to not hurt when I stub it; I'm dubious that they'll pull any aspect of these movies off if they get made. They really fucked up
both sequels with so much potential they had built up after the first movie.