American Idle
How can something be overrated if no one watches it? The difference between the two shows is that Chuck is written by actual nerds and BBT is written by people who have to look up all their geek references online. Which is why all their characters are cartoon stereotypes and none of their references have any context. Chuck is the real deal. BBT is the the pretender. Man I hate Chuck Lorre.3. "Chuck"/"The Big Bang Theory"
Two shows, two different nerd stars, two premieres during the worst slate of new series in decades. Somehow these shows survived, and in their absence have grown into critically acclaimed masterpieces. What? Did nobody notice that "Chuck" is extremely boring and the one joke on "The Big Bang Theory" grew tired mid-way through the pilot?
I will agree with you here. Now, I thought Firefly was great and lots of fun. One day, however, I caught the end of one episode of Angel. The show had never appealed to me, but I was curious as to the rest of this particular episode so I looked it up on Wikipedia. Well, 30 minutes later I had the rundown on both Angel and Buffy. Yikes! I see now how Firefly could have gone, and I'm now glad it ended when it did, as an intact show. That's how I will enjoy it.Firefly: Great show. But it's not the end-all-be-all of Sci Fi. Alot of people think that sadly. And the only reason it's still so loved is because it's idiot creator, Joss Whedon, didn't have a chance to screw it up like everything else he does. So unlike Buffy and Angel fans, FF fans should consider themselves lucky.
Dragon's Denbasically what happens is...^Haven't seen that one.
Dragons' Den is one of finest hours of television you can ever see. Shame on you for thinking otherwise.
And The Big Bang Theory is one of the worst sitcoms I've ever seen. And I've seen BBC1 on a Friday night.
How can something be overrated if no one watches it? The difference between the two shows is that Chuck is written by actual nerds and BBT is written by people who have to look up all their geek references online. Which is why all their characters are cartoon stereotypes and none of their references have any context. Chuck is the real deal. BBT is the the pretender. Man I hate Chuck Lorre.3. "Chuck"/"The Big Bang Theory"
Two shows, two different nerd stars, two premieres during the worst slate of new series in decades. Somehow these shows survived, and in their absence have grown into critically acclaimed masterpieces. What? Did nobody notice that "Chuck" is extremely boring and the one joke on "The Big Bang Theory" grew tired mid-way through the pilot?
How can something be overrated if no one watches it? The difference between the two shows is that Chuck is written by actual nerds and BBT is written by people who have to look up all their geek references online. Which is why all their characters are cartoon stereotypes and none of their references have any context. Chuck is the real deal. BBT is the the pretender. Man I hate Chuck Lorre.3. "Chuck"/"The Big Bang Theory"
Two shows, two different nerd stars, two premieres during the worst slate of new series in decades. Somehow these shows survived, and in their absence have grown into critically acclaimed masterpieces. What? Did nobody notice that "Chuck" is extremely boring and the one joke on "The Big Bang Theory" grew tired mid-way through the pilot?
I don't know, I'd have to disagree with that. My boyfriend, for instance, is working on his PhD in Physics right now and absolutely loves Big Bang Theory because of all the science references. He is always laughing along to all the sciencey jokes that go way over my head. And he knows his stuff. So I'd say it's the "real deal." We never really got into Chuck on the other hand.
How can something be overrated if no one watches it? The difference between the two shows is that Chuck is written by actual nerds and BBT is written by people who have to look up all their geek references online. Which is why all their characters are cartoon stereotypes and none of their references have any context. Chuck is the real deal. BBT is the the pretender. Man I hate Chuck Lorre.
I don't know, I'd have to disagree with that. My boyfriend, for instance, is working on his PhD in Physics right now and absolutely loves Big Bang Theory because of all the science references. He is always laughing along to all the sciencey jokes that go way over my head. And he knows his stuff. So I'd say it's the "real deal." We never really got into Chuck on the other hand.
Ok, fair enough. I don't know any science geeks so that very may well be the case. All the ones I do know are gamer geeks like Morgan and Chuck. Still, the way they present the nerds on BBT as social retards is annoying and generic and stereotypical. I thought that Revenge of The Nerds cliche went out with Kevin Smith movies. That Chuck Lorre. So full of originality and creativity.
How can something be overrated if no one watches it?
zombie thread shows. I think they're dreadful
I don't agree with that, Jill seemed to think she was perfect at times, but the writer's never portrayed her as perfect, quite often when she wouldn't allow Tim something he actually proved her wrong by the end of the episode (after blowing up various things, which made Jill's initial reactions understandable). There were also episodes were Jill flat out admitted she was wrong.
Home Improvement - Let me sum this show up for you, warning spoilers ahead: Tim is a complete imbecile because he is a man. Jill is perfect because she is a woman. There, you never have to watch a single episode.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.