I mean if there was any chance at all wouldn't each of those thirty-nine destroyed starships also have come to the same conclusion Riker did?
Our TOS heroes frequently threatened their foes with suicide, but always merely in the form of bluff. When self-destruct would have made a strategic difference but could not have been used as a bluff, Scotty suggested it but Kirk dismissed the idea as insane ("By Any Other Name"). Probably suicide is strongly against the Starfleet code or UFP ethical codes in general, as also suggested by "Half a Life" and all those times Klingons or Romulans attempted or committed suicide.
Timo Saloniemi
So what the hell was Picard playing at in Where Silence Has Lease?
Choosing to destroy his whole crew as opposed to half.
*Theres only been one real instance (NEM...Picard literally rammed the Ent-E down the throat of the Scimitar and then quickly ordered Self Destruct, which was disabled by the damage but nonetheless, to make sure Shinzon wouldn't be able to deploy the Thalaron Weapon) where the Enterprise Crew were close to sacrificing themselves in order to save countless more lives
Even with the Self Destruct offline, couldn't LaForge have made the 1701-E warp core go critical and explode? (results like the battle caused 1701-D warp core explosion in GEN)
Star Trek: The Motionless Picture said:ROSS: Why has the Captain ordered self-destruct, sir?
SCOTT: I would say, lass, because he thinks -- he hopes -- that when we go up... we'll take V'ger with us.
ROSS: Will we?
SCOTT: When that much matter and anti-matter are brought together? Oh, yes; we will, indeed.
So I think "warp ramming" isn't likely to cause that much more damage than just ramming the ship at full-impulse.
I would think the Borg "Subspace Field" prevents this, sure they can Warp Away, but Warping into a ship wouldn't work, the Ship would bounce off or perhaps end up trapped in Subspace
Perhaps what is intended to cause damage to the opposing vessel isn't the starship itself, or even the ship's antimatter supplies, but instead the damage will be caused by the warp field itself as the field moves through the structure of the opposing vessel.Such an "idea" seems to ignore that even when the ship is moving at maximum warp (something like 2000x the speed of light) it's not really moving at that speed (and, thus doesn't have that much energy) because the ship doesn't move at the speed through "real space." It manipulates the fabric of space so that its vastly slower speeds in subspace translates to "FTL speeds" in normal space.
So I think "warp ramming" isn't likely to cause that much more damage than just ramming the ship at full-impulse.
So I think "warp ramming" isn't likely to cause that much more damage than just ramming the ship at full-impulse.
As to why no one at Wolf 359 tried ramming, I think the fleet was badly commanded. In Q Who, the Enterprise inflicted 20% damage on the Borg ship with only three shots, and in BoBW, Data said it would take 80% damage to disable the cube. Each Federation vessel only needed to inflict 2% damage to destroy the Borg, yet they failed.
Torpedoes are said to travel at warp speed as well; while their antimatter/quantum warheads surely do most of the damage, would their speed be a factor in damage dealt as well?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.