Bad example to use with me, because I'd be more confident of success if we were talking about Joss Whedon. Of course, Aaron Sorkin burned himself out trying to do the same thing on The West Wing, resulting in increasing production costs due to late scripts. If Sorkin couldn't hack it, why should I be confident that Darabont can? You could also ask J. Michael Straczynski about the hazards of trying to write entire seasons on your own. A writing staff is there for more than just breaking the stories and writing the scripts; the writers are there to tell one another when they're trying to move forward with a bad idea. If Darabont has no other writers on the series, the only people left are the other producers. I think it's a bad idea.I think he's up to the task. This is Frank we're talking about, not Joss Whedon.Having that much involvement in the final scripts doesn't necessarily mean that the writing staff was useless in breaking the stories while in the writers' room. Also, writing and/or co-writing and/or re-writing four episodes would seem to be significantly different than taking on a similar task for a thirteen episode season.
Also, writing and/or co-writing and/or re-writing four episodes would seem to be significantly different than taking on a similar task for a thirteen episode season.
Bad example to use with me, because I'd be more confident of success if we were talking about Joss Whedon.I think he's up to the task. This is Frank we're talking about, not Joss Whedon.Having that much involvement in the final scripts doesn't necessarily mean that the writing staff was useless in breaking the stories while in the writers' room. Also, writing and/or co-writing and/or re-writing four episodes would seem to be significantly different than taking on a similar task for a thirteen episode season.
True, which is why I think it's a bad idea, rather than going farther and calling it a terrible idea. In fact, it makes me wonder if season two won't routinely wander off the roadmap of the comics if he goes with freelancers.On the other hand, it's not as if he has to start from scratch. He has a lot of material he can take from the comics. In fact, one could argue that this show is designed especially for freelancers. The work-for-hire writers can always read the comics to avoid any concerns about misunderstanding the tone or direction of the series.
Ah, that could explain it.That's very odd, considering how well the show did, both in terms of quality and ratings. I wonder if he didn't get along with them or something.The other, and even bigger, piece of news is that Darabont is considering not having a writing staff for season two. Instead, he is apparently thinking about having all thirteen scripts for next season come from freelancers, likely with himself either co-writing or doing rewrites on each episode as he did this season. The article also states that he has already let go the season one writing staff.![]()
This season, Darabont wrote two of the episodes himself. Two more were written by freelancers not on staff. And of the remaining two, Darabont cowrote/rewrote.
Seems to me that the "staff" was pretty useless.
Loved seeing the sister wake up as a zombie.
Loved seeing the sister wake up as a zombie.
It was eerie. Almost like watching someone being born. Very strange and also incredibly bittersweet.
It's a reference to the circus sideshow freak that would bite the heads off live chickens, who was called a geek. I always thought it was funny when the modern use of "geek" started to mean someone smart and nerdy ... definitely not the historical connotation of the word.So why (maybe from the comics explanation) do they call the zombies geeks??? Is there a story behind that?
I don't think they referred to them as geeks in the comic series, but in some zombie-apocalypse short fiction the Zs are called "geeks".
I only watch it in the daytime. No way I could sleep an hour after "Guts"I know that this show really gets to me because every Sunday night, after watching it, I have nightmares about the zombie apocalypse.
Anybody else?![]()
Yeah, they really should have shot him in the head. Nobody really knows what the experience of zombiehood is like, but considering their behavior, it wouldn't surprise me if they are in a constant state of painful, desperate hunger. Just because they can't reason or communicate doesn't mean they can't feel, at an animal level. If I were Jim, I'd have demanded they shoot me in the head, just to be safe.I don't understand why they would just leave the bitten guy to die, though. Why would he (or they) want him to be a Zombie? I somehow suspect he will turn up again later as a Walker.
Oh, some scenes, certainly. I don't actually own any issues myself (I've been periodically borrowing large stacks from a friend for the last couple years) so I don't have any issues handy at the moment to do some quick reference checks. Jim sitting under the tree, though, was definitely one, and you can see a comparison of the two Amy death scenes here side-by-side. The CDC angle, though, is entirely created for the television show. At this point in the comics, all of the Atlanta survivors were in Dale's RV on the road; a CDC facility didn't enter into things at all.[...] Can anyone who reads the comics confirm that they've been mimicking scenes?
[...] Can anyone who reads the comics confirm that they've been mimicking scenes?
Exactly. Especially since they've seen signs of intelligence in the Zombies.Yeah, they really should have shot him in the head. Nobody really knows what the experience of zombiehood is like, but considering their behavior, it wouldn't surprise me if they are in a constant state of painful, desperate hunger. Just because they can't reason or communicate doesn't mean they can't feel, at an animal level. If I were Jim, I'd have demanded they shoot me in the head, just to be safe.I don't understand why they would just leave the bitten guy to die, though. Why would he (or they) want him to be a Zombie? I somehow suspect he will turn up again later as a Walker.![]()
That's because, unlike most TV and movies, this is actually written for adults.I thought it was hilarious when the director cuts from Andrea cradling her dead sister to a scene where the redneck guy suddenly jerks upright, which is exactly what the sister would have done in a bad zombie movie - the redneck guy wasn't even part of the Andrea scene, but I still jumped.And of course when sis does revive, there are no cheesy shocks, just a very sad and strangely lovely sequence. This show is really good at defying expectations.
Me too!! That would have made much more sense.I was expecting Daryl to finish him off with the cross bow.
YES! I'm continually impressed with how much more depth the individual scenes have than most TV - I feel as if I'm watching real people, with real emotions. It's quite moving, actually. I never thought I'd get sniffly while watching zombies!That's because, unlike most TV and movies, this is actually written for adults.This show is really good at defying expectations.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.