• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why were Khan and all of his followers blonde?

I still think the plot contrivances in NuTrek are worse than the holes in TWoK but the pre-fix code with those fabulous clunky buttons - great fun!
 
How could the Reliant crew be unable to tell the fifth and sixth planets of a system apart or be unaware that a planet had exploded? Why wasn't there anything in the Starfleet databases telling them, "Hey, the Ceti Alpha system has dangerous genetically enhanced colonists so you should stay away from it?"

Did any of the subsequent novels try to explain those points? I thought they had, but I could be mistaken.

If Chekov was on board during "Space Seed" as the movie claimed, why didn't he remember that Ceti Alpha was where Khan's people had been settled?

The general assumption seems to be that Chekov was a redshirt security guard at the time. So he probably wouldn't be privy to such information.
 
I would not have been surprised when CBS Paramount remastered TOS several years ago, if they used CG to insert Walter Koenig's Chekov in to background scenes of the remastered "Space Seed", just to correct continuity for WOK.;)
 
So when it comes to logic holes and plot contrivances, TWOK and ST'09 are about equal.

While I am under no illusions that those are no plot holes, some of those you mention are kind of nit-picky. Things like that do not pull me out of the movie and some only become clear after repeated viewings. Both films have them, but it's an issue of degree. There's a difference to me between a film not holding up under repeated viewing and not holding up while watching it for the first time. TWOK, like any well written story, establishes a level of reality and sustains it throughout. It doesn't matter how unrealistic that reality is, it is consistent from start to finish. On the other hand, Trek 09 creates a level of reality, then disregards it for the sake of expediency midway through the picture before reigning it back in.

We know the sequence, a lot of people have pointed it out. nuSpock doesn't toss Kirk in the brig and prefer charges. Instead. he sticks the Enterprise's first officer into an escape pod and ejects him from the ship. I realize Spock just lost his mom and homeworld, but this is probably an action the brass would frown upon and Spock was established as being by the book. Luckily, they're passing a planet which just happens to be the place oldSpock is stranded, after which Kirk is chased into the exact cave oldSpock is hiding, when he suddenly remembers there's a Federation outpost nearby. I wonder why he didn't think of that sooner and gone there himself instead of freezing his nuts off in a cave? Their lucky streak continues as this outpost is where Scotty happens to be waiting. This is just lazy storytelling. Scientifc things and astral configurations zip by most people. They accept terms and images at face value as conventions of the genre without concern for accuracy. But they will notice when a well presented story suddenly gets totally unrealistic midway. The writers are asking the audience to accept a lot in that portion of the film, and most do out of goodwill. But that doesn't erase the weakness.

This, and the promotion from Cadet to Captain at the end (another breach of their established reality), are the only two issues I have with the story. I was always more than happy to ignore the other little holes because it's such a fun ride. But there's really nothing that huge in TWOK. Nitpicky stuff can be shrugged off with a few mental connecting of dots. Bad writing is just bad writing, and it sticks out even more because the rest of the film is so well done.

Sorry, I didn't want this to be a old vs new film hijacking, especially since I liked the 09 film a hell of a lot.
 
Like I said, it's a judgment call. I think there are plenty of things in TWOK that are stupid and lazy and contrived, and I don't find it as satisfying as I find ST'09. It's a matter of opinion, and it's pointless to argue matters of opinion as if they were provable facts. Some people prefer the one, some prefer the other. But they are the two most popular Trek movies ever made, despite their problems. So they both must've done something right, however much they both got wrong.
 
But they are the two most popular Trek movies ever made, despite their problems. So they both must've done something right, however much they both got wrong.

Can't argue with that. They're both fun and emotionally involving films.
 
Actually if I understand my genetics right, blonde hair is a recessive trait. Wouldn't brown or black be more likely, were an artificially superior human being created?
 
Most of all, if the Genesis torpedo was programmed and designed to reformat the surface of an existing planet into a habitable ecosystem, how could that programming also work to construct an entire planet -- and possibly even a star -- out of the material in a nebula? That's like trying to use a spreadsheet program to create CGI animation and have it actually work.
The writers of the ST2 script may have fumbled this one, but the movie itself features no fumble. Nobody says, implies or shows that the Genesis device would have worked against its programmed instructions.

The device was detonated within a star system, as established by the fact that neither of the combatant ships had warp drive. The star system featured at least one dead planet. The first time the Genesis planet was glimpsed, it was already a planet in shape, even if with significant orange overcast. So apparently the Genesis device converted a dead planet into a living planet, as it was supposed to do. It was simply detonated at a bit greater distance than originally intended - but dialogue clearly established that the effect would propagate through space.

Another good example of the benefits of ignoring author intent and going with what's "really" there...

Timo Saloniemi
 
I have no problem with the Genesis wave but should it be possible to have a nebula within a star system in the first place? Wouldn't the gravity of the star and planets have dissipated the gases?
 
Somebody on this BBS offered a compelling argument that Mutara was actually a sort of unusually dense planetary nebula surrounding a star, perhaps cast-off atmosphere from it, and Regula was a planetoid orbiting that star at a distance, beyond the limits of the nebula. It doesn't fit the visual appearance of the Mutara Nebula (which was modelled on an HII emission nebula like the Orion or Trifid Nebula), but it's the most plausible explanation I've heard.
 
This scene seems to indicate a star, perhaps a white dwarf, behind Reliant.

twok0976.jpg
 
The Mutara Nebula sequence would've made a lot more astrophysical sense if it had been a Jovian planet's atmosphere. Then you could've had clouds of that density and electrostatic interference like what was shown. (Real nebulae are far less dense than Earth's atmosphere, essentially a slightly dirty vacuum.) And the Genesis Planet could've been a terraformed moon.
 
The "lightning flashes" were a moving effect. This is more like a stationary strobe. If there were a white dwarf perhaps it's cannibalizing a small companion star, brown dwarf or jovian planet.
 
...should it be possible to have a nebula within a star system in the first place?

It should be a question of timing only. Saturn shouldn't have rings, except for a few million fleeting years - we just happen to catch that planet at her most beautiful thanks to a fluke of timing. The Mutara nebula might be on her way to collapsing into the Regula system, or might even be what the system was born out of, very recently (with the asteroid Regula possibly being a random capture rather than a local product). That'd make the nebula all the more dynamic, which is a plus when we wish to explain her anomalious density and electrical activity.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top