Except there are many religions that celebrate Christmas, in those ceremonies did the president single out one religion to promote? Catholic, lutheran, 7th day adventist, etc?At this point I would bring up countless pictures of every President attending the White House Christmas Tree ceremony and utterly destroy this idiotically moronic statement...but that would be in bad taste.This is the first time in my lifetime I can remember any president supporting any one religion.
Unless his argument is "I don't know what I'm talking about," in which case his point is being made exceptionally well.
Al Qaeda [....] tolerate our sensitivities about a particular place?
Hmm. Where have I seen these things in juxtaposition before? Oh yes:
"The latest and the greatest of these aggressions, incurred by the Muslims since the death of the Prophet (ALLAH'S BLESSING AND SALUTATIONS ON HIM) is the occupation of the land of the two Holy Places -the foundation of the house of Islam, the place of the revelation, the source of the message and the place of the noble Ka'ba, the Qiblah of all Muslims- by the armies of the American Crusaders and their allies." - Bin Laden, issuing his 1996 fatwa against the United States
Incidentally, I notice that Bin Laden's writing style rather resembles my own. Heh.
If your recipe for the preservation of liberty requires the destruction of liberty (the freedom to speak and to hear) then you've already lost.
I think that is what worrys me the most about that list, say what you will about Glen Beck, but to the best of my knowledge he has never said that the sun revolves around the Earth.America the Ignorant (Linky)
Among the other ignorant things Americans believe as highlighted in the linked article ...
%21 believe there are real sorcerors, conjurers, and warlocks out there
%20 believe that the sun revolves around the Earth
More than 1/3rd can't identify which continent the Amazon river is located on
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, I noticed that. Now consider Bin Laden's statement. It makes it clear that intrusion on places a people considers sacred builds intense resentment, leading directly to violence, in his case the slaughter of 3000 American civilians. So now the Muslims want to build an Islamic center next to a place where 3000 Americans were killed by Islamic extremists, a place we consider sacred, and the only conclusion to draw is that it is an act of provocation aimed at inciting us to extreme violence. It's almost guaranteed that some angry New Yorker will react violently, an action that will be cited in some future Al-Qaeda press release after they blow up a bunch more Western shoppers.
Nope. The preservation of liberty and peace already places restrictions on free speech, both in federal and state law. A person can physically beat you to a pulp and walk away without facing any charges, even in San Francisco, if you ran your mouth over the line and pissed them off. In fact, you can face charges for inciting the violent confrontation.
This attempts to equate the U.S. government installing military bases in Sauda Arabia to wage war against an Islamic nation with the private ownership and building of an Islamic Community center.
Those are not at all the same thing. You are comparing the actions of individuals with the actions of governments. The community center is not a provocative act unless you make the logical leap to equate Islam with terror. That's the only way this act can be provocative.
To live harmoniously in that competition requires everyone to understand the consequences of their actions.
My message to the Christian community in Malaysia is that using the word Allah to mean the Christian God may be theologically and legally correct, but in the context of Malaysia, it is socially provocative.
T'Bonz wrote:
Politics and hot button stuff do NOT belong in Misc.
I realize some of the reason it has drifted here is because a poster can't post in TNZ and so is bringing it here and his "friends" are following him to make trouble.
Knock it the fuck off. It stops now, or I will stop it. If that includes tossing posters off the board, so be it.
You have TNZ. Play your games there. Keep it out of the other forums. As for the poster in question, you lost TNZ privileges due to your behavior. You are NOT to do that shit in other forums. Got it?
If you're aiming this at Locutus, BA, its null and void. Here's T'Bonz most recent guideline on politics in Misc, and what the mods look for. This thread has been largely civil so there's no point in stirring the pot. We have a handle on itGuess some just don't get it...T'Bonz wrote:
Politics and hot button stuff do NOT belong in Misc.
I realize some of the reason it has drifted here is because a poster can't post in TNZ and so is bringing it here and his "friends" are following him to make trouble.
Knock it the fuck off. It stops now, or I will stop it. If that includes tossing posters off the board, so be it.
You have TNZ. Play your games there. Keep it out of the other forums. As for the poster in question, you lost TNZ privileges due to your behavior. You are NOT to do that shit in other forums. Got it?
Except there are many religions that celebrate Christmas, in those ceremonies did the president single out one religion to promote? Catholic, lutheran, 7th day adventist, etc?At this point I would bring up countless pictures of every President attending the White House Christmas Tree ceremony and utterly destroy this idiotically moronic statement...but that would be in bad taste.This is the first time in my lifetime I can remember any president supporting any one religion.
T'Bonz wrote:
Politics and hot button stuff do NOT belong in Misc.
I realize some of the reason it has drifted here is because a poster can't post in TNZ and so is bringing it here and his "friends" are following him to make trouble.
Knock it the fuck off. It stops now, or I will stop it. If that includes tossing posters off the board, so be it.
You have TNZ. Play your games there. Keep it out of the other forums. As for the poster in question, you lost TNZ privileges due to your behavior. You are NOT to do that shit in other forums. Got it?
Guess some just don't get it...
We've decided to lift the moratorium on political and hot-button/controversial topics in Miscellaneous. However, there are some stipulations.
To borrow a phrase from RJ, focus on "ideas, not ideology," and discussion of individual policies rather than your negative impression of a political party or group as a whole. Starting a topic to discuss tax hikes by the Obama administration is acceptable. Prefacing it by saying "Those damn libs are trying to create a socialist welfare state!" in the title or body of the post is not, since that is not conducive to creating reasonable discussion. Topics that start out like this or rapidly devolve into back and forth sniping along these lines will be closed.
The same goes for extreme rhetoric aimed at the GOP, Christians, Atheists, Muslims, Pro-Choicers, Botswanans (oh, yeah, that's a big one), etc. Avoid generalizations that paint entire groups of people with the same broad brush. Avoid language aimed at riling people up rather than getting a reasoned and well-thought out response.
If someone does resort to this type of rhetoric in the OP or subsequent posts, as they inevitably will, then please notify or PM the mods in question rather than sinking down to the level of the troublemaking post in the topic.
We think Miscellaneous is perfectly capable of having these types of discussions without resorting to namecalling and posturing, and look forward to discussing these types of issues with you guys again.
I'll leave this topic open if anyone has any suggestions or questions on the new policy.
Thank you.
Except there are many religions that celebrate Christmas, in those ceremonies did the president single out one religion to promote? Catholic, lutheran, 7th day adventist, etc?At this point I would bring up countless pictures of every President attending the White House Christmas Tree ceremony and utterly destroy this idiotically moronic statement...but that would be in bad taste.
So Christianity is as many religions as there are denominations but Islam is monolithic?
there's no point in stirring the pot. We have a handle on it![]()
To a large extent, yes. Islam has Sunni (about 87% of Muslims) and Shia (about 12% of Muslims). Some are sufi who could be either Sunni or Shia. There are a few other very very minor sects but their numbers are insignificant.
For blame on that, look no further than the cowardly republicans who are afraid of having those prisoners on US soil. The same chickens afraid of giving them trials.Obama also plainly and constantly said that he'd close Gitmo (now remaining open indefinitely).
To a large extent, yes. Islam has Sunni (about 87% of Muslims) and Shia (about 12% of Muslims). Some are sufi who could be either Sunni or Shia. There are a few other very very minor sects but their numbers are insignificant.
Christianity has Catholic (about 60% of Christians) and Protestant (about 40% of Christians). There are some sub divisions and other minor sects but they're insignificant really outside academia.
Stating the complex as simplistically as you can doesn't mean the complexity goes away, you simply choose not to discuss it. Both of those large groups of Muslims contain many sub divisions and just like Protestants are not monolithic in belief or practice. The differences probably seem insignificant to an outsider; but can many atheists truly explain the differences between many Christian denominations? And if they lived outside a primarily Christian nation, would they even acknowledge the distinction?
Since the people building the community center are not the people who attacked us on 9-11 nor do they support those attackers or approve of the attacks it is absurd to consider this as any kind of provocation.Yeah, I noticed that. Now consider Bin Laden's statement. It makes it clear that intrusion on places a people considers sacred builds intense resentment, leading directly to violence, in his case the slaughter of 3000 American civilians. So now the Muslims want to build an Islamic center next to a place where 3000 Americans were killed by Islamic extremists, a place we consider sacred, and the only conclusion to draw is that it is an act of provocation aimed at inciting us to extreme violence. It's almost guaranteed that some angry New Yorker will react violently, an action that will be cited in some future Al-Qaeda press release after they blow up a bunch more Western shoppers.
To a large extent, yes. Islam has Sunni (about 87% of Muslims) and Shia (about 12% of Muslims). Some are sufi who could be either Sunni or Shia. There are a few other very very minor sects but their numbers are insignificant.
Christianity has Catholic (about 60% of Christians) and Protestant (about 40% of Christians). There are some sub divisions and other minor sects but they're insignificant really outside academia.
Stating the complex as simplistically as you can doesn't mean the complexity goes away, you simply choose not to discuss it. Both of those large groups of Muslims contain many sub divisions and just like Protestants are not monolithic in belief or practice.
The differences probably seem insignificant to an outsider;
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.