• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Last episode of At the Movies

I've been watching a lot of Siskel & Ebert clips lately. I didn't even realize the show was ending soon when I started and the fact that it did made that marathon sadly appropriate. While I liked some of the other hosts, what I find most impressive about Siskel & Ebert compared to them was how much more passionate they were. It always seemed like they couldn't wait to start talking about a movie once the clips finished playing, always about to burst with enthusiasm, much like me when I'm excited about a movie, whether I love it or hate it.

By comparison, I feel a lot of the other hosts were way too casual about their job, especially Roeper, who would drag down Ebert by making the whole discussion too laid back. When Siskel was there, they both always came to fight, meaning they were always intent on having a spirited discussion no matter what. As this retrospective points out in talking about their review of "The Mask", sometimes they would intensely spar even when they agreed that a movie was good!

I thought A.O. Scott always came off as a bit of a pretentious snob, so I never really liked his presence on the show, but I liked the warmth and humour Phillips brought to it. Roeper and Scott being smug kept me from ever being as completely satisfied with any host combinations after Siskel & Ebert.

A great thing about Siskel was also how weird some of his reasons for disliking movies were...this is one reason why I still thought he was hilarious and endearing even though he panned some of my favourite movies ("Scarface", "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", "The Big Lebowski"). I loved his criticism of Elizabeth Berkeley in "Showgirls" for being 'too hard in the face' and of The Dude in "The Big Lebowski" for being too much of a 'dude type'. :lol:

My favourite reviews of theirs were the ones where they would get angry at a movie. Among the best examples are Siskel saying "She's Outta Control" "wasn't a movie...some sort of a strange concoction from someone who doesn't understand what movies are all about", their disgust at the product placement in "Leonard Part 6" ("boy, you're upset...AND YOU KNOW, I AM TOO!") :guffaw:.

I also like that they approached every movie they reviewed seriously, intending to analyze in the most fair and professional manner possible. They never dismissed a movie right off the bat simply because it had a ridiculous premise or belonged to one of the less 'prestigious' genres like horror, comedy, or animation.

I never saw the movie or the series it was based on, but it irritated me that when reviewing "The Spongebob Squarepants Movie", Roeper basically said nothing more than, "the only people who would like this besides kids are people on drugs, and it's unnecessary because there are already so many episodes". Shut up and review the movie. Talk about the characters and the story. I don't care that it's a frivolous cartoon...Siskel would have taken the more mature route. Siskel & Ebert were so fun on talk shows too.

Some aforementioned favourite clips (and a few others) -

I can't stop laughing at this bit they did for David Letterman:
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxD42FSRjXA&playnext=1&videos=rqS9Towrhdg[/yt]

"Leonard: Part 6" - "How highly, highly humorous."
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTpQvW46xS8[/yt]

"She's Out of Control" - "Less than nothing."
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pxWtt5DVGU&feature=related[/yt]

"Poltergeist III" - "Carol Anne, Carol Anne! Bruce! Bruce! Patricia! Patricia!" :rofl:
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyO2zp9VXKU[/yt]
 
I thought A.O. Scott always came off as a bit of a pretentious snob, so I never really liked his presence on the show, but I liked the warmth and humour Phillips brought to it.

I thought A.O. Scott was a bit of a pretentious snob back when he would appear as the occasional guest co-host on the Ebert & Roeper edition of the show (his panning of In Bruges, one of my favorite films of all time, was enough for me to perennially dislike him) but I actually warmed up to him during his tenure as permanent co-host with Phillips. I thought they had a good dynamic and bounced off each other nicely.
 

Man----Ben Mankiewicz deserves a medal for not slapping that stupid twat and telling him to shut the FUCK UP. Why exactly does Ben Lyons mention how much money Sandler's other films have made? How is that relevant to whether that film is any good or not? What an arrogant little moron. Every time I heard Lyons open his gob, all I could think about was how big a bribe did he take to pass out all these good reviews to such obviously suck-ass films?


Argh.
 
I just saw this for the first time and had to post it because it's so funny, I got a huge laugh out of it. Ebert has a tendency to sometimes let his awe at an actress's beauty make him biased in favour of a movie (his recommendation of Tomb Raider, for example) and Siskel really takes him to task for it here. "Take a still picture!"...high-larious!.
 
^Oh.My.God. I hate to admit this but I loved the movie they are fighting over. I have wonderful childhood memories attached to it.
 
I still find their show more convenient for learning about new movies than any single site on the internet I've ever run across. Continuing that format on a website would be the ideal option.
Indeed.

I'm also sad that the show's over. I really liked Roeper with Phillips and that Wolanski guy, but I liked Phillips and Scott also. I didn't mind the Bens, in large part because Ben Mankiewicz sometimes co-hosts the awesome political Internet show The Young Turks. And while Lyons was an obvious weak link, I never really minded him. I'd rather have both Bens back then no show at all.

As for the best At the Movies debate ever? Ebert vs. Roeper on Attack of the Clones was totally epic, both in length, emotion and all-around funny.
 
I lost track after Ebert and Roeper dropped Ebert and then guest critics and then no more thumbs to just dropping the show for an online format.

Siskel and Ebert's credits felt very Chicago-y(but that was expected)

Shame this show has fallen so far.

I remember Ebert saying he'd take Siskel's son to see "The Phantom Menace"
 
I thought A.O. Scott always came off as a bit of a pretentious snob, so I never really liked his presence on the show, but I liked the warmth and humour Phillips brought to it.

I don't have clear recall of that time, but that certainly wasn't the case in the latest run with Phillips. Scott did actually say he used to be pretentious in the last episode, and that Siskel and Ebert taught him that there is value in lower brow movies. Consistent with that, he's given positive reviews to movies like 2012 and others like it. He's not pretentious... he just kind of has a pretentious looking face.
 
As for the best At the Movies debate ever? Ebert vs. Roeper on Attack of the Clones was totally epic, both in length, emotion and all-around funny.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgXLINXVo98&feature=search[/yt]

Wow, Roeper is an idiot! :rommie: He liked the love story and the dialogue? He thought all the actors were "strong"? Amazing!
 
He liked the love story?? Oh dear...........:lol:


Roger nailed this one. "Tired cliches. Love story is dead in the water." Yep. Pretty much says it all.
 
I haven't seen that show in 15+ years it comes on in the early morning hrs (2-3 am).
I won't miss it.
 
One awesome thing about the series was one's ability to get a snapshot's impression of any given movie's look and feel via the reviews. A real public service, and now, thanks to the web, a real treasure trove of not only criticism but record-keeping.

Damn, I'm gonna miss this show. Here's hoping fresh Ebert/Phillips/Scott ventures come quick.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top