• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TATV sux!!11!!! vol.47 - the Jonathan Frakes edition

yea, I thought Enterprise was fine. TATV was ok, interesting w/ TNG characters on it, but really not needed. Let Enterprise go out on their own terms, not hallogramed, that sucked I thought.
 
See, the thing also is that actors don't take things so personal. It's just work.

Nimoy is no different than Frakes or any other actor. I'm pretty sure he refused to appear in Generations because his paycheck and role wasn't as big as Shatner's.
He claimed he refused to do Generations for the same reasons he appeared in Star Trek 2009 and Fringe: a character that spoke interchangeable lines and could have been played by anyone. The role of Spock Prime could have gone to Picard, too, or some random stranger from the future who fights Nero and knows a bit about history and transwarp beaming.
That's not true at all. Spock Prime had the very specific role of telling AU Kirk about their (i.e. Kirk and Spock's) friendship, as well as advising his younger AU self to accept his own emotions as well as logic, a lesson that Spock Prime learned over the years. This is also a way to book-end the character and give him a sort of closure: we saw him slowly accepting his emotions over the course of the movies, from TMP after the meld with V'Ger, to TUC and "Logic is just the beginning of wisdom"; Spock from TNG "Unification" is very different from Spock from TOS, but hasn't fully accepted his Human side, as seen in the conversation with Data. In STXI we saw an even older Spock who has, no doubt, changed some more as a result of an event of huge emotional importance for him - the meld with Picard that allowed him to feel his father's thoughts and feelings for the first time. The Spock we see in STXI is calmer, serene, he has finally come to the point where he is no longer conflicted and is fully accepting of every aspect of his personality.

I think all actors constantly weigh money vs. acting a beloved character. Both Frakes and Nimoy can be picky about which roles they choose, so I doubt Frakes was only in it for the money. He probably has a soft spot in his heart for Riker and wanted the chance to act with Marina Sirtis again. Nimoy has a well-known love/hate relationship with Shatner and some of the cast of TOS. It probably isn't as important to him to take on the ears to act with old friends. And Nimoy himself has a love/hate/love relationship with Spock. I think as an actor that's probably hampered him from doing more ... which is a shame because he's a hell of an actor. I also think he realizes that Spock is a character that isn't just a science fiction character, but has entered the psyche of now three or four generations. Spock will live on (and prosper) as one of the greatest fictional characters of all times, right along with Darth Vader (not Anakin), Sherlock Holmes, etc.

From purely a script POV, I thought STXI/STI (the do over) was very, very weak. That's probably for a whole 'nuther thread.

At any rate, I agree that Frakes believes it's rough for a cast to have someone else finish up the season for them. But as discussed before, this wasn't just Enterprise's last show ... it was Star Trek's until JJ Abrams showed up and decided to take up the mantle. I think having it as Enterprise's last show and Star Trek's simultaneously was too bad.

For the record, here's what I thought worked for TATV:
* Trip's death from a dramatic sense
* The de-comissioning of Enterprise
* Riker and Troi show up again (and I really didn't like Troi from TNG)
* Riker's "playing" Chef
* Ending with the beginning of the Federation

What didn't work:
* Weird species we hadn't heard of killing Trip
* Trinneer's acting of Trip before getting killed
* Shran becoming a gem thief instead of using it to explain some TOS mythos (like dilithium crystals)
* T'Pol was all over the board

I feel sorry for the Enterprise cast that they didn't get their swan song and that we have the terrible Demons and barely watchable Terra Prime (minus the 5 mins toward the end) as well as TATV to end on. It would've been more fun for all involved if the last episode was 1) Enterprise ending with a 2) 1-hour special on Star Trek. I think it's Moonves madness that he didn't approve something to say goodbye to Star Trek. Like it'd be fun to interview the actors, but even seeing them in character through the generations involved in the Federation would be fun.

I also like Number 6's answer.
 
I don't get the Frakes hate in here. It's not like he's some no-account loser just showing up to ruin the show: he's way more a part of Star Trek than any of us, and probably has pretty strong feelings about it as an actor and director. He's been in the business for what, thirty years?, and is still getting plenty of directing work. Seems quite happy about it, too. I can't comprehend why someone would "hold it against him" for taking an acting job. It's not like he bought the network and then demanded that the producers cast his nephew as a Gary Stu who constantly one-ups the stars, or something like that. He just showed up to do his job, on an episode that I'm sure even his harshest critics will agree had far more working against it than his performance.
 
I don't get the Frakes hate in here. It's not like he's some no-account loser just showing up to ruin the show: he's way more a part of Star Trek than any of us, and probably has pretty strong feelings about it as an actor and director. He's been in the business for what, thirty years?, and is still getting plenty of directing work. Seems quite happy about it, too. I can't comprehend why someone would "hold it against him" for taking an acting job. It's not like he bought the network and then demanded that the producers cast his nephew as a Gary Stu who constantly one-ups the stars, or something like that. He just showed up to do his job, on an episode that I'm sure even his harshest critics will agree had far more working against it than his performance.

No I agree, Frakes has talent and has shown it. Marina Sirtis on the other hand...
 
[From purely a script POV, I thought STXI/STI (the do over) was very, very weak. That's probably for a whole 'nuther thread.

At any rate, I agree that Frakes believes it's rough for a cast to have someone else finish up the season for them. But as discussed before, this wasn't just Enterprise's last show ... it was Star Trek's until JJ Abrams showed up and decided to take up the mantle. I think having it as Enterprise's last show and Star Trek's simultaneously was too bad.

For the record, here's what I thought worked for TATV:
* Trip's death from a dramatic sense
* The de-comissioning of Enterprise
* Riker and Troi show up again (and I really didn't like Troi from TNG)
* Riker's "playing" Chef
* Ending with the beginning of the Federation

What didn't work:
* Weird species we hadn't heard of killing Trip
* Trinneer's acting of Trip before getting killed
* Shran becoming a gem thief instead of using it to explain some TOS mythos (like dilithium crystals)
* T'Pol was all over the board

I feel sorry for the Enterprise cast that they didn't get their swan song and that we have the terrible Demons and barely watchable Terra Prime (minus the 5 mins toward the end) as well as TATV to end on. It would've been more fun for all involved if the last episode was 1) Enterprise ending with a 2) 1-hour special on Star Trek. I think it's Moonves madness that he didn't approve something to say goodbye to Star Trek. Like it'd be fun to interview the actors, but even seeing them in character through the generations involved in the Federation would be fun.

I also like Number 6's answer.

I respect your right to your opinion...but surely you must realize that Star Trek 09 was loved by critics and many fans??? Likewise, Demons and Terra Prime are generally very well regarded by fans. TATV on the other hand is not...

Also...Trineer's acting in TATV was fine...however his poorly written death scenes are in no way dramatic...just totally unnecessary (and the events are completely unbelievable).
 
I respect your right to your opinion...but surely you must realize that Star Trek 09 was loved by critics and many fans???
Yep. The only real weakness of ST09 were plot holes, something that every Trek movie or TV show suffers from. The cast, the acting and the dialogue exceeded my expectations by a mile. Not to mention production design and SFX...

Likewise, Demons and Terra Prime are generally very well regarded by fans. TATV on the other hand is not...
And not only because of the plot, but because of drama. Blalock, Trinneer, Bilingsley and even Bakula gave us some really beautiful, powerful moments in Deamons/Terra Prime, while in TATV, their body language made them look like they were thinking "Oh, lets just get this over with already."

Just take the Archer/T'Pol scene in Trip's quarters for example... Bakula looked so uncomfortable in that scene... Almost as if he was embarrassed for having to say those godawful lines...

To tell the truth, the only actor who did okay in TATV was Frakes. He seemed relaxed and charming (as expected from Will Riker), but he felt sooo out of place. His seasoned look completely disabled me from suspending disbelief - he simply could not pass for a TNG season 7 Riker. Same with Sirtis (even more so, actually)...

Still, the idea of never again seeing Will Riker on screen saddens me... Can't say the same for Troi, though...
 
What Mach5 said...

and this:

Also...Trineer's acting in TATV was fine...however his poorly written death scenes are in no way dramatic...just totally unnecessary (and the events are completely unbelievable).

I think that Sim's death (and conseqent funeral) was a far, far better than what the writers did to Trip in TaTV. There was no meaning in the scene just before he dies where there could have been some real potential for gut-wrenching heart break. No proper grief from ANYONE. 10 years this crew is supposed to have been together, they lose their chief engineer and grieving his death amounts to a short scene of platitudes with no real emotion?

No. His death wasn't well done at all, IMO.

I know that they were sending off Star Trek (and at the time we had no hope that there would be any kind of new trek)... but in trying to send off all of Trek with ENT's finale they completely belittled ENT, the actors, the (good) writers, the staff who put their blood sweat and tears into this show. Oh and let's not forget the fans who stuck by the series even during the less than stellar times.

As for Frakes. It's a job. I can't begrudge the guy for doing his job. He acted well, though like Mach5 I didn't find it believable at ALL that he could have been Riker from season 7 TNG.
 
As for Frakes. It's a job. I can't begrudge the guy for doing his job. He acted well, though like Mach5 I didn't find it believable at ALL that he could have been Riker from season 7 TNG.

Yeah, that was pretty fucked up. They simply should have done this on the Titan or Enterprise-E.
 
Have their been "official" opinions published by the writers/producers?
maybe at a convention etc.?
Brannon Braga sort of apologized (admitted that TATV was crap), while Rick Berman basically told us to go fuck ourselves IIRC...
 
Brannon Braga sort of apologized (admitted that TATV was crap), while Rick Berman basically told us to go fuck ourselves IIRC...

Really, I'd like to see that quote.
:lol:

How about this?

Dick Berman said:
I've read a lot of the criticisms and I understand how some people feel, but [Braga] and I spent a lot of time coming up with the idea and a somewhat, I would say, unique ending to a series, especially when you’re ending it prematurely. [...]

You never like to disappoint people, but I think its nonsense to say that it was more a Next Generation episode than a Enterprise episode.
Usually, when someone calls my opinion "nonsense," I get a little offended... :alienblush:
 
There's a reason I stopped rewatching Enterprise at Terra Prime. Im pretty sure the sheer lack of logic and general stupidity in this episode caused the Vulcan Time of Awakening.
 
Brannon Braga sort of apologized (admitted that TATV was crap), while Rick Berman basically told us to go fuck ourselves IIRC...

Really, I'd like to see that quote.
:lol:

How about this?

Dick Berman said:
I've read a lot of the criticisms and I understand how some people feel, but [Braga] and I spent a lot of time coming up with the idea and a somewhat, I would say, unique ending to a series, especially when you’re ending it prematurely. [...]

You never like to disappoint people, but I think its nonsense to say that it was more a Next Generation episode than a Enterprise episode.
Usually, when someone calls my opinion "nonsense," I get a little offended... :alienblush:

Oh dude, don't take things so personal. ;)

I also don't think it was a TNG episode. Relics wasn't a TOS episode just because of a cameo and re-used sets.
 
It wouldn't have taken much to turn TATV around.
It could have been halfway decent.

By the way, I love the quote that it took "a lot of time" to come up with the concept for the finale, since the main criticism of the episode is that it seemed very hastily pieced together. LOL.

Anyway, I still enjoy TATV because the relaunched novels fixed the main problem.
The ;) with Trip means something. It's the saving grace of the whole episode.
 
Really, I'd like to see that quote.
:lol:

How about this?

Dick Berman said:
I've read a lot of the criticisms and I understand how some people feel, but [Braga] and I spent a lot of time coming up with the idea and a somewhat, I would say, unique ending to a series, especially when you’re ending it prematurely. [...]

You never like to disappoint people, but I think its nonsense to say that it was more a Next Generation episode than a Enterprise episode.
Usually, when someone calls my opinion "nonsense," I get a little offended... :alienblush:

Oh dude, don't take things so personal. ;)

I also don't think it was a TNG episode. Relics wasn't a TOS episode just because of a cameo and re-used sets.

Um, Relics didn't take place on the 1701 Enterprise from TOS; or in the 23rd century.

TATV TOOK PLACE on the 1701-D (various locations and on the holodeck); and for the entire episode 9as set up by the story); the only REAL characters involved were Riker and Troi.
^^^^^^^^^
Ergo - It was DEFINITELY and ONLY a TNG episode. (IMO)
 
^ Praise Jesus!

The ENTIRE episode takes place on Enterprise D in the 24th century, with Riker and Troi being the only TWO flesh and blood characters in it (not counting the Ten Forward extras)...

Yeah, shame on me for suggesting such nonsense... :rolleyes:

BTW, I'm not taking that shit personally... :alienblush:
 
Brannon Braga stated that TATV was a good idea in concept that fell flat on execution and to this day I don't think Berman ever told a fan to go fuck him/her/itself.

But don't let any real facts get in the way of this ridiculous hyperbolic rant.
 
I also don't think it was a TNG episode. Relics wasn't a TOS episode just because of a cameo and re-used sets.

As already said, Relics didn't take place in the 23rd century.

Also, Relics focused on both Scotty and the TNG characters. It was as much an episode about the TNG characters, and LaForge in particular, as it was about Scotty.

TATV, however, is all about Riker. The ENT characters are only in it to service the story about Riker finding the courage to do the right thing and tell Picard about the Pegasus.
 
Brannon Braga stated that TATV was a good idea in concept that fell flat on execution and to this day I don't think Berman ever told a fan to go fuck him/her/itself.

But don't let any real facts get in the way of this ridiculous hyperbolic rant.
God I love it when people take shit literally (and by "shit," I mean stuff or things, not excrement... Oh, and just in case, by "things" and "stuff" I don't mean material objects but written thoughts)... :rolleyes:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top