• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

My God, it's full of THREAD BOMBS!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did we ever have this:

significance2.jpg
 
^BOTH of them :confused:

The first one is supposed to be a put-down, but the second is supposed to be an ego-booster!



Nice image if you like this sort of thing:

Historical figures.
 
^It is pretty cool - I just wish I could name half of the people :rommie:

ETA:
(And why is Peter Ustinov wearing a toga?)

Same here. I was looking at the picture and pointing at each historical figure. I was like "Einstein! Hitler! Beethoven! ...uh... don't know, don't know, don't know... don't know... Stalin! Freud! Lincoln! Ghandi! Shirley Temple!... don't know... don't know...uh... some guy... Lenin! Mao! Prince Charles! Charlie Chaplin! Saddam Hussein! William Shakespeare! Um... someone... ugly... hairy... Van Gogh! Genghis Khan! Che Guevera! Napoleon! Bruce Lee! Yassir Arafat! Elvis! ...weird...guy... uh, don't know, don't know, don't care, don't know..." and so on. :D
 
There will always be nine. No poxy skywatchers are going to tell us otherwise.

Actually, since those "poxy skywatchers" are the people who have studied these things for years and have some very good reasons to consider Pluto a dwarf planet, they get to decide how many planets there are. Just like how doctors get to decide the name of diseases and biologists get to decide the name of organisms.
 
There will always be nine. No poxy skywatchers are going to tell us otherwise.

Actually, since those "poxy skywatchers" are the people who have studied these things for years and have some very good reasons to consider Pluto a dwarf planet, they get to decide how many planets there are. Just like how doctors get to decide the name of diseases and biologists get to decide the name of organisms.

They didn't rename Pluto, they redefined what it is, which is not the same.
 
There will always be nine. No poxy skywatchers are going to tell us otherwise.

Actually, since those "poxy skywatchers" are the people who have studied these things for years and have some very good reasons to consider Pluto a dwarf planet, they get to decide how many planets there are. Just like how doctors get to decide the name of diseases and biologists get to decide the name of organisms.

They didn't rename Pluto, they redefined what it is, which is not the same.

Okay, so my examples weren't so great, but my point still stands.
TBH I can't really see how anyone could claim there's nine planets. Even if you don't agree with the IAU's new definition of planet, surely you'd have to consider Eris a planet too? It's larger, more massive, and in a similarly weird orbit as Pluto. The same thing goes for the other 3 dwarf planets. So if you consider Pluto to still be a planet, wouldn't you logically have to consider there to be 10-13 planets?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top