Which just goes to show, an sf show wouldn't have to be the greatest quality to get a nomination. Being buzz-worthy, high-profile and popular is probably more important. But it can't be an embarassing stinker like most sf on TV is nowadays.SF needs to come up to the level of the shows that do get nominated. Caprica might have a shot someday if they keep improving. Anyway if True Blood can get nominated, an SF show along the same lines should have a chance.
True Blood won't win anything. It didn't get a single acting or writing nomination. It only got nominated for series because it's the biggest show on HBO right now. I'm surprised it go in, since I consider the first season to be a guilty pleasure.
Ditto. I eventually watch most if not all major Oscar contenders, but most of the Emmy nominated stuff just bores me.Hell, the Emmys make me feel even more out of touch than the Oscars.
In particular, Rachel reminds me so much of all the insufferable divas that I had to deal with back in high school drama club.
In particular, Rachel reminds me so much of all the insufferable divas that I had to deal with back in high school drama club.
I don't know who Rachel is, but I'd imagine that your reaction is just what they were going for.![]()
She has a mix of sympathetic and unsympathetic traits. On the former, she's generally a very good person (one of the better people on the show), and she's taken a lot of crap over the years; conversely, she has a desperate need to be famous, and when status is at stake she develops severe tunnel-vision.In particular, Rachel reminds me so much of all the insufferable divas that I had to deal with back in high school drama club.
I don't know who Rachel is, but I'd imagine that your reaction is just what they were going for.![]()
Sometimes I think you're right and sometimes I'm just not sure. While her unlikability would seem to be a deliberate character choice, she's often treated far too much like a sympathetic protagonist, despite my complete lack of sympathy for her. Not that the two characters have much in common, but it's kinda like if they'd made Buffy the Vampire Slayer with Cordelia as the lead character (and I'm talking uber-bitch Season 1 Cordelia).
I wish Community had gotten some love. At the very least one nomination, as Modern Warfare is the best 22 minutes I've seen in a long time.
"Unlikable"* main characters are all the rage nowadays.
*They may seem unlikable but the successful ones - Dexter Morgan, Jax Teller, Walter White, Bill Henrickson, Don Draper, et al - are carefully crafted so that the audience never loses sympathy for them. That's the whole trick.
First, I'm not really sure I see the distinction here. Rachel genuinely believes that she's the most talented (and, frankly, she is; that's why everybody puts up with her in her diva moments), and says so; how's that different from McKay? And she has admitted on several occasions that she can be difficult to be around.Wheras Dr. McKay seems to geniunely believe that he is infinitely smarter than everyone else on Atlantis and will deliberately try to put people in their place, Rachel doesn't seem to realize how unkind she is to everyone else.
I also don't see this. Schuester tries to manage her as best he can, and he's never let one of her fits of ego outright take something from one of the others. In fact, he quite pointedly stood her down in episode 4 when she wanted to sing "Tonight" instead of Tina.Furthermore, I lose a lot of respect for Schue every time he puts up with one of her tantrums, particularly since I think she diverts too much of his time & attention away from the rest of the kids. (This was something else I hated dealing with in high school-- teachers who have their obvious favorites and don't apologize for it.)
John Noble should've been nominated for Fringe. He knocked it out of the park in season 2.
Well, he certainly deserved a nomination more than Martin Short did.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.