I would imagine that in New Zealand a homeless person would be easily able to access free health care.
Maybe his death was drug related?
That would count as an underlying cause, perhaps not just of his death but his homelessness as well.
I would imagine that in New Zealand a homeless person would be easily able to access free health care.
Maybe his death was drug related?
This doesn't look to me like a picture of a cyclist being killed by a drunk driver; it looks like a picture of FIFTEEN cyclists being killed by a drunk driver. Give or take. And as both a driver and a cyclist myself, may I say: "BAD driver! BAD!"
I get the snide remarks. They can be funny. But the danger is is in alienating oneself from the reality behind what register only as set-ups for punchlines on these innernets. Especially in cases like these where we're dealing with real tragedy around a loaded pop-culture phenomenon. "Render unto Caesar...", but Christ dude, don't forget God.
I hope his death was natural...an undiagnosed medical condition, aneurysm or something, and not a suicide. To quote Magneto, "Young people..."
^I haven't made jokes about the man's death. My sympathy for him goes without saying.
Of course, if you want me to, I can go on a rant about how western society abandons young men to homelessness. That'll make the thread much better, I'm sure.
Note my specific, pointed directions to the guy who rolled his eyes. You didn't roll your eyes.
Your comments and doubleohfive's seem more directed towards the general tone of the thread to me - how we're not all expressing our sympathy towards the man who died rather than using the opportunity to take the piss out of Twilight.
Mine point more to Tulin's reaction as if doubleohfive's comments spoiled the fun. I get that people use humor to let off steam and discomfort, I had no problem with that, it's just that doubleoh was making a relevant comment about remembering the whole purpose of the thread, a comment in which Tulin made his opinion known, and that's what I was commenting upon.
Well, they were both right and they were both wrong.
doubleohfive was right that we should remember that a homeless man died here and he was wrong by reminding us in his usual condescending manner.
Tulin was right that doubleohfive's intervention was not necessary and wrong to demonstrate that by using a threadbomb to do so.
^His reaction, yes, his way of putting it, no.
^His reaction, yes, his way of putting it, no.
His reaction was appropriate to the topic at hand.
^His reaction, yes, his way of putting it, no.
His reaction was appropriate to the topic at hand.
In your view. As I said, we could turn this thread in to a discussion of homelessness but I don't think a Twilight thread is the place to do that.
Well, of course in my view, what other view would it be in? doubleohfive's response was reasonable. As for this thread being the place to discuss homelessness, we're already discussing the unpleasant and sad death of a 23 year old man. Well, at least, we are now.
Well, of course in my view, what other view would it be in? doubleohfive's response was reasonable. As for this thread being the place to discuss homelessness, we're already discussing the unpleasant and sad death of a 23 year old man. Well, at least, we are now.
Where it's not really going to achieve much or receive the attention it deserves.
Perhaps you should think about what he said. Maybe he's making a good point and you should listen.
I get the snide remarks. They can be funny. But the danger is is in alienating oneself from the reality behind what register only as set-ups for punchlines on these innernets.
Perhaps you should think about what he said. Maybe he's making a good point and you should listen.
Or maybe he's just being a dick.
I hate to break it to you, but people die all the time. More than you could keep up with if you did nothing else but post 'xxx has died' threads continuously like some kind of robot. The reason the thread exists - the reason the news story exists - is because it happened in a movie theatre; something which naturally invites sly comments regarding the film in question, particularly when that film is part of a polarising contemporary pop culture phenomenon.
That the man's death is tragic goes without saying. And if one is personally disinclined to humour, that's fine. Implying that those who can 'see the lighter side' are being monstrously insensitive (towards whom? Is there a family member present we haven't been informed about?) and are thereby terrible human beings? Yeah, now you're a dick.
God help him if doubleohfive ever discovers the Darwin Awards. His head will probably explode in self-righteous indignation.
I'd rather doubleohfive not get insulted, whether you agree with him or not.
Hermiod, putting aside for the moment that you seem to relish in any chance to bad-mouth me, I made my response in this thread because I was disgusted at the total lack of empathy on display. Not really shocked to see you back at it with your usual reverse-mysogyny inferiority complex again, but whether you liked it or not I was perfectly within my right to make the comment I did. Like it or love it. Take a step outside of your obviously horrible and tortured world and maybe think for a second about how other people might be feeling.
On 24 March 1975 Alex Mitchell, a 50-year-old bricklayer from King's Lynn literally died laughing while watching an episode of The Goodies. According to his wife, who was a witness, Mitchell was unable to stop laughing whilst watching a sketch in the episode "Kung Fu Kapers" in which Tim Brooke-Taylor, dressed as a kilted Scotsman, used a set of bagpipes to defend himself from a black pudding-wielding Bill Oddie (master of the ancient Lancastrian martial art "Ecky-Thump") in a demonstration of the Scottish martial art of "Hoots-Toot-ochaye." After twenty-five minutes of continuous laughter Mitchell finally slumped on the settee and died from heart failure. His widow later sent the Goodies a letter thanking them for making Mitchell's final moments so pleasant.
Hermiod, I'm not going to engage you in this silly back-and-forth. You can offer up all the personal criticism you want at me. Just because I defended my position doesn't mean that "personal criticism is a one-way street" with me.
As for my "barbs" -- you've opened yourself up to it on numerous occasions. Nothing I've seen in the last year has led me to believe you've grown out of it. Maybe I shouldn't have made the comment above, but it's hardly unwarranted.
But if people want to be assholes about it and just dismiss me because I'm taking an unpopular stand on the issue, go ahead. This place is full of assholes already. (Yes, I'm one of them).
But the kid is still dead. And fuck you all, that's sad to me. Not devastatingly sad the way it would be if it had been someone close to me, but still ... sad.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.