^tsq enflames the menfolk here too. The important factor is only how you express it.
If, however, the menfolk are not meant to be enflamed then we've just solved Earth's population crisis. Decent men do not degrade women or themselves by wanting to have sex with them.
Way to completely fucking miss the point. You are apart of the entitled mentality, aren't you? Entitled to do what you want but not to be offended or treated differently if you dare to dress slutty and be treated as such. When you dress to provoke, you cannot complain when you provoke.There you go, TSQ. You've been told. Next time you're going to have the audacity to go out in public, have the good sense to leave your boobs at home. You're inflaming the menfolk by being visibly female in public.
It may come to that.Maybe you should hand out a couple of warnings before shutting down a thread.
I totally agree with you, Miss Chicken.I really think I have important, and relevant things to still say in this thread and I think I am saying them in a way that is appropriate for Miscellaneous.
Did you even read what I said or did you jump on the sexist soapbox and start blindly yelling? Maybe next time, you go back, read my original comment and pull your head from your ass before you start accusing me of saying rape is ever acceptable. I never once said it was okay or anyone was "asking for it" to dress provactively then get raped. I said if you dress a certain way, you're going to get comments and stares. Words and stares are going to be reasonable if you dress inappropriately. It doesn't, and I stated this clear as glass, mean it is acceptable to touch or rape someone.
This thread, sadly, is getting way WAY too overheated. Be civil or I'm going to close it down.
What about a chastity belt?
Wait, no, I'm not being a prude on this one. If I was a chick and I was in SA where rape is so high, I'd wear one. That way, I don't have to wear one "inside" and from the outside the rapist can obviously see from near the beginning of the attack that sex isn't possible. Instead of having him actually violate her, receiving trauma to his cock then enraging and beating or killing her.
Wouldn't a chastity belt be easier?
Are people in this thread just cherry-picking what they read? Go back, read again. Dressing in scantly clad or revealing clothing does not tell other people they want to pretend they're not trying to draw attention to their bodies. Drawing attention to your body tells others you want to be looked at, and being looked at comes with some unwanted comments or advances, but it does not mean it's okay to touch.Well, it's nice to know women have to be careful what they wear if they want to be respected or treated with any kind of decency.![]()
It may come to that.Maybe you should hand out a couple of warnings before shutting down a thread.
I totally agree with you, Miss Chicken.I really think I have important, and relevant things to still say in this thread and I think I am saying them in a way that is appropriate for Miscellaneous.
Are people in this thread just cherry-picking what they read? Go back, read again. Dressing in scantly clad or revealing clothing does not tell other people they want to pretend they're not trying to draw attention to their bodies. Drawing attention to your body tells others you want to be looked at, and being looked at comes with some unwanted comments or advances, but it does not mean it's okay to touch.
How much more clearly can it be said? Should I start typing in caps or are you going to just ignore the fact dressing inappropriately results in inappropriate comments?
Are people in this thread just cherry-picking what they read? Go back, read again. Dressing in scantly clad or revealing clothing does not tell other people they want to pretend they're not trying to draw attention to their bodies. Drawing attention to your body tells others you want to be looked at, and being looked at comes with some unwanted comments or advances, but it does not mean it's okay to touch.Well, it's nice to know women have to be careful what they wear if they want to be respected or treated with any kind of decency.![]()
How much more clearly can it be said? Should I start typing in caps or are you going to just ignore the fact dressing inappropriately results in inappropriate comments?
May I suggest renaming the thread to something more appropiate to what it's about now. Miss Chicken suggests there's more to say, but I'm not sure everyone with something to say will know what's being discussed in a thread with a title about a condom and the World Cup.
Gee, I don't know, when I see a woman dressed provocatively, I might think some dirty thoughts, but I have enough fucking manners to keep it to myself. Since when does a woman being scantily clad give everyone around her license to act like a pig?
While the moderators can edit thread titles, we only limit that ability to any rule breaking (ie crass language etc). It would be improper to change the title in this case.May I suggest renaming the thread to something more appropiate to what it's about now. Miss Chicken suggests there's more to say, but I'm not sure everyone with something to say will know what's being discussed in a thread with a title about a condom and the World Cup.
Well, the topic title is a little misleading given even the content of the OP (I was going to suggest that the thread had been derailed when in fact it hadn't really, silly me), and certainly such a move can help with other threads that are more ambiguously titled (such as "What annoys me..." and "Can you believe this?!" and others of its ilk), but I can see it setting a precedent for all other discussion threads in the BBS by promoting off-topic conversation. Such as this.
.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.