It may sound rather bland to some but I would love for a new series to continue off not that long after the war. There is potential for some really rich stories. What does everyone think?
Maniarek.
Too much politics is one of the things that killed Enterprise, important as a occasional minor sub-plot. But please never a main subject.see more scenes set on Earth such as in the Council Chamber and other government entities
Have the Federation break up, not just politically, but socially, culturally, have many of the member realize that one of the prime reasons they joined the Federation in the first place, protection, wasn't there when they needed it. That the action of the mechanism of their supposive protection, Starfleet, was a big part of what triggered the war that took so many lives.The Federation is in a weakened state
It may sound rather bland to some but I would love for a new series to continue off not that long after the war. There is potential for some really rich stories. What does everyone think?
Maniarek.
With all respect Maniarek, Star Trek is a character driven show. With the exception of Sisko, you didn't mention a single character. Is it just the old crew, are there any new faces, new allies, new villains?Too much politics is one of the things that killed Enterprise, important as a occasional minor sub-plot. But please never a main subject.see more scenes set on Earth such as in the Council Chamber and other government entitiesHave the Federation break up, not just politically, but socially, culturally, have many of the member realize that one of the prime reasons they joined the Federation in the first place, protection, wasn't there when they needed it. That the action of the mechanism of their supposive protection, Starfleet, was a big part of what triggered the war that took so many lives.The Federation is in a weakened state
Have our heroes face not just the Dominion, Cardassians, Romulans, but also have to face many of their former friends from the academy.
The member states that broke away in clumps took their "share" of Starfleet with them.
Nothing as ever said about members not being able to secede from the Federation anytime they wish, so this wouldn't have to be a civil war series.
I was agreeing with you up to this point. I'd really, really hate that. I don't want to see everyone in the Quadrant joining the Federation. It's a little scary to think of any galactic power becoming that powerful, and the idea that "the Federation way is the only right way, and you can all be saved only through the Federation" makes me sick. It makes me think of Eddington's comparison of Federation to Borg.The Federation is the ultimate example of that vision, and breaking it up into a weakened state sounds very un-Star Trek to me. If anything I'd like to see a future series where old enemies like the Klingons, Rommies and Cardies have become Federation members!
I was agreeing with you up to this point. I'd really, really hate that. I don't want to see everyone in the Quadrant joining the Federation. It's a little scary to think of any galactic power becoming that powerful, and the idea that "the Federation way is the only right way, and you can all be saved only through the Federation" makes me sick. It makes me think of Eddington's comparison of Federation to Borg.The Federation is the ultimate example of that vision, and breaking it up into a weakened state sounds very un-Star Trek to me. If anything I'd like to see a future series where old enemies like the Klingons, Rommies and Cardies have become Federation members!
The future of Star Trek has already arrived. The new movie series, for all the nay sayers, did what no one thought could be done; it re-did TOS, the only TREK show that has any long shelf life, and made it hip and made serious $$$. If Paramount is wise, and this has never been so, but if it is? It will veto any attempt to bring TREK back to TV until the new movie series runs it course. Many in this thread don't agree with that, but Paramount has already shown they don't care what the 'base' wants, and that is a good thing.
Now...once the movie series is done? Then yes, a new TREK series might be a good idea. But I hope not. After this current movie series fades away I hope TREK is put out to stud in the book world....forever.
Rob
Why can't they remain separate states on peaceful and cooperative terms with each other? I don't think that everyone has to essentially become one state, in order not to have war and conflict. The idea of the entire quadrant being essentially united under one government doesn't sit well with me.I was agreeing with you up to this point. I'd really, really hate that. I don't want to see everyone in the Quadrant joining the Federation. It's a little scary to think of any galactic power becoming that powerful, and the idea that "the Federation way is the only right way, and you can all be saved only through the Federation" makes me sick. It makes me think of Eddington's comparison of Federation to Borg.The Federation is the ultimate example of that vision, and breaking it up into a weakened state sounds very un-Star Trek to me. If anything I'd like to see a future series where old enemies like the Klingons, Rommies and Cardies have become Federation members!
Well of course I can see your point, but I think you're twisting my intentions a bit. The whole idea of "the Federation way is the only right way" - that sounds more like the Dominion to me. I never said anything about the Federation 'saving' the Klingon, Romulan or Cardassian people.
I just think the idea of the Klingons, Romulans and Cardassians continuing to be hostile towards the Federation forever is a bit absurd, especially considering that the Klingons have been allies with the Federations for what, a century? Two centuries?
The way I can imagine it happening (and of course, I understand that other people will see it differently) is that over time, the Federation's peaceful interactions with the Klingons, Romulans and Cardassians will slowly be strengthened into mutual co-operation, then eventually an alliance, and then eventually, perhaps after centuries, it would only be logical for the Klingons, Romulans and Cardassians to join the Federation.
Why can't they embrace those ideals on their own, without becoming a part of the Federation? I don't believe that the Federation way is the only way. Another planet-state might prefer a completely different economic system, for instance. Or it might not be interested in exploration of distant planets.However, I also believe that it won't simply be a matter of those former empires being absorbed into the almighty Federation, and losing all sense of its former identity. I think that as each race joins the Federation, they will have a profound impact on the Federation and change it subtly from the Federation we currently know. At its core, the Federation is just a republic of 'nation'-states, united by the common ideals of universal liberty, equality, justice, peace, and cooperation. I don't see why, in the future, the various 'enemies' of the Federation couldn't change to embrace that same ideal, while still maintaining their sense of identity.
EU is not nearly as 'united' as the Federation is. Its role in foreign policy is limited (e.g. EU cannot declare war on another state, or forbid any of its members to do the same), institutions such as European Parliament and European Council have far less power than the governments of individual states, and individuals states retain their own military forces and an amount of freedom in politics and economy (e.g. to refuse to replace their currency with the common currency of EU - only 11 out of 27 member states are using euro). It is, at best, a loose confederation. Furthermore, it is far from being the only major power on the planet. If the major powers of the Alpha Quadrant - Klingon Empire, Romulan Star Empire and Cardassian Union were to join the Federation, it would be more like USA, Russia and China joining a much more united and federal European Union.I'm not particularly well versed in how the modern EU works (you would know better than me, I assume), but from what I understand, it works in essentially the same way as the Federation. And isn't it true that nations who were formerly enemies are now essentially 'united' in the EU?
Why can't they remain separate states on peaceful and cooperative terms with each other? I don't think that everyone has to essentially become one state, in order not to have war and conflict. The idea of the entire quadrant being essentially united under one government doesn't sit well with me.I was agreeing with you up to this point. I'd really, really hate that. I don't want to see everyone in the Quadrant joining the Federation. It's a little scary to think of any galactic power becoming that powerful, and the idea that "the Federation way is the only right way, and you can all be saved only through the Federation" makes me sick. It makes me think of Eddington's comparison of Federation to Borg.
Well of course I can see your point, but I think you're twisting my intentions a bit. The whole idea of "the Federation way is the only right way" - that sounds more like the Dominion to me. I never said anything about the Federation 'saving' the Klingon, Romulan or Cardassian people.
I just think the idea of the Klingons, Romulans and Cardassians continuing to be hostile towards the Federation forever is a bit absurd, especially considering that the Klingons have been allies with the Federations for what, a century? Two centuries?
The way I can imagine it happening (and of course, I understand that other people will see it differently) is that over time, the Federation's peaceful interactions with the Klingons, Romulans and Cardassians will slowly be strengthened into mutual co-operation, then eventually an alliance, and then eventually, perhaps after centuries, it would only be logical for the Klingons, Romulans and Cardassians to join the Federation.
Why can't they embrace those ideals on their own, without becoming a part of the Federation? I don't believe that the Federation way is the only way. Another planet-state might prefer a completely different economic system, for instance. Or it might not be interested in exploration of distant planets.However, I also believe that it won't simply be a matter of those former empires being absorbed into the almighty Federation, and losing all sense of its former identity. I think that as each race joins the Federation, they will have a profound impact on the Federation and change it subtly from the Federation we currently know. At its core, the Federation is just a republic of 'nation'-states, united by the common ideals of universal liberty, equality, justice, peace, and cooperation. I don't see why, in the future, the various 'enemies' of the Federation couldn't change to embrace that same ideal, while still maintaining their sense of identity.
And if the Federation does change that much, than it will be something else. For starters, it would need to change its name, if it were to be a loose confederation, or maybe not even that, but an organization similar to United Nations. Starfleet would also have to change its structure and role, and there might not even be a UFP Starfleet anymore. but an Earth Starfleet, etc.
EU is not nearly as 'united' as the Federation is. Its role in foreign policy is limited (e.g. EU cannot declare war on another state, or forbid any of its members to do the same), institutions such as European Parliament and European Council have far less power than the governments of individual states, and individuals states retain their own military forces and an amount of freedom in politics and economy (e.g. to refuse to replace their currency with the common currency of EU - only 11 out of 27 member states are using euro). It is, at best, a loose confederation. Furthermore, it is far from being the only major power on the planet. If the major powers of the Alpha Quadrant - Klingon Empire, Romulan Star Empire and Cardassian Union were to join the Federation, it would be more like USA, Russia and China joining a much more united and federal European Union.I'm not particularly well versed in how the modern EU works (you would know better than me, I assume), but from what I understand, it works in essentially the same way as the Federation. And isn't it true that nations who were formerly enemies are now essentially 'united' in the EU?
I think that's way to complicated and messy. And I don't think Spock wil reveal anything about what will happen in the future. He's not the kind of person who will disobey the temporal prime directive. The only thing that he might mention in the star that went nova, because it will go nova again.
Why can't they remain separate states on peaceful and cooperative terms with each other? I don't think that everyone has to essentially become one state, in order not to have war and conflict. The idea of the entire quadrant being essentially united under one government doesn't sit well with me.
The obvious assumption in that scenario is that the unseen enemy will be scary and cool up until the point they make an appearance, whereupon they will be revealed to be a boring, lame ripoff of something else, most likely the Borg or maybe those guys from the Alien movies, and everyone will yawn and change the channel.
Prove I'm wrong.
The series begins with a fleet of Dominion ships coming through the wormhole. Leading the armada is the new Dominion flag ship carrying the entire changeling race. The Dominion is fleeing the Gamma Quadrant
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.