You've just compared them actually. It wasn't that hard.To me the styles and tones are so different it's hard to really compare.
RTD's was big and bold and emotional-- which I loved.
Moffat's is small and quirky and old-fashioned-- which I also love.
It's a terrible analogy. It's because things are different that we're able to compare them.Well yeah, you could compare apples and oranges to see which you'd like most.
But then you'd ruin the analogy forever.
You've just compared them actually. It wasn't that hard.To me the styles and tones are so different it's hard to really compare.
RTD's was big and bold and emotional-- which I loved.
Moffat's is small and quirky and old-fashioned-- which I also love.![]()
Stop raping my childhood man!It's a terrible analogy. It's because things are different that we're able to compare them.Well yeah, you could compare apples and oranges to see which you'd like most.
But then you'd ruin the analogy forever.
It's not a competition, jeeeze.
It's not a competition, jeeeze.
Most definitely agreed, and for a number of reasons. It seems rather silly to compare 9 episodes with four series worth... in part because several of the eps in those four were written by the showrunner of the new nine.
I'm sorry, when did this kind of thing become acceptable? That I give an opinion on a TV show (with reasons, I'd stress) that I'm not even alone in having, and you suggest my inability to enjoy it means I'm somehow fucked up? I'm always very careful to make sure that whenever I disagree with someone in such a way, I don't make it personal, but you've gone straight for it. I think that reflects far more badly on you. Poor show.Oh God I know I shouldn't bite, but seriously I have to know. What or who fucked you up, dude. Seriously what life changing event made you such an angry person?
I don't expect an answer but like Khan it tasks me...
I think you'll find it was Moffat who delivered Blink 1.0 (whatever that even means) in the first place. Indeed, most of the best episodes in the first 4 series (Unquiet Dead, Dalek, Empty Child, Blink, Human Nature etc) were written by people other than RTD. Considering how high a proportion of stories were his, he had a very low hit rate. Of course, Fear Her wasn't his doing either, but he'd scored a new low with Love and Monsters the previous week anyway.The important thing is the season hasn't sucked, IMO, so at worst it's been status quo with RTD, which is pretty damn good because RTD produced some of the best Doctor Who ever. But Moffat hasn't delivered Blink 2.0 yet. Then again, it took RTD 3 seasons to deliver Blink 1.0. On the other hand, again IMO, Moffat hasn't delivered a Fear Her yet, either.
Yeah, I watched it. It's how I have an opinion on it.Hang on now, did you watch the 4th series? If you did - and you did so in something approaching an objective manner - you'd surely see how bizarre this statement is.
You think? You might like the character, but I'd say she was still a fairly poor one-note actor either way. Previous experience doesn't matter to me in this instance; I'm judging it on what I saw.Firstly, Tate exhibited a much wider range of acting skills in Doctor Who than on her godawful sketch show. She is not just a comedian, she is an actor and has been in plenty of other productions, both TV and theatre.
Yeah, she didn't have a catchphrase, but her whole delivery was based around her usual mugging to the camera routine. "You ain't mating with me, sunshine" and the like, while competing with Tennant in the silly face-pulling stakes.Second, she was never just comedic relief and sure as hell never had any catchphrases. Other than the running, inconsequential joke about Donna and the Doctor being married, I'm struggling to think of any instances of straight-out comedy she was even involved in. And I've just rewatched that series from start to finish.
I think she was picked because she was the kind of successful media type the insufferable middle class prats at the Radio Times and the like keep talking up. Same kind of reason we had Peter Kay and are going to have James Corden. Ultimately, it's stunt casting. They look at who's popular (usually on the BBC) and bung them in Doctor Who in the hope of appealing to more people. Lowest common denominator and all that.Third, Tate has been on various shows on BBC and C4 for years and was hardly picked because of her sketch show success or its brand of humour. Ever heard of Big Train, just to pick one of the many successful programmes she's been in that is nothing like her show?
The same media types I described above. And RTD was pretty much the king of them.Fourth, what does 'smug luvvies' even mean?
Err, well I watched it and judged accordingly. I do my best to put aside pre-conceived notions before watching and to judge things based on their own merits. I'm even prepared to be completely surprised and like that coming Roberts-penned episode with the Doctor living with fatboy for a week. That said, it doesn't mean I'm too hopeful for it.It wouldn't surprise me in the least if you never gave Tate the slightest of chances to impress or grow on you as Donna. You'd hardly be the only one who couldn't look past her sketch show and, in my opinion, missed out on the best RTD-era companion. To relate to the thread's topic, to date, she is considerably more entertaining than Amy has been, and I say that as someone who likes Amy.
Oh yeah, I know. I'm happy to argue the points this way. It's when people resort to labels and name calling that I get irritated. And it does seem people are more likely to get away with it if it's aimed towards someone with a minority opinion.To be clear, I am not picking on you here. I simply disagree with your assessment of Donna Noble as companion.
I'm sorry, when did this kind of thing become acceptable? That I give an opinion on a TV show (with reasons, I'd stress) that I'm not even alone in having, and you suggest my inability to enjoy it means I'm somehow fucked up? I'm always very careful to make sure that whenever I disagree with someone in such a way, I don't make it personal, but you've gone straight for it. I think that reflects far more badly on you. Poor show.Oh God I know I shouldn't bite, but seriously I have to know. What or who fucked you up, dude. Seriously what life changing event made you such an angry person?
I don't expect an answer but like Khan it tasks me...
Rose was a thick chav who was the feeble attempt at a love interest in RTD's attempt to turn DW into a soap opera.
My view on Tate is that her performances reigned Tennant in a little so that he was 'Allons-y-ing' all over the place quite as much. For this reason alone, I much preferred the Tate/Tennant dynamic and the 4th season in general to Tennant's previous seasons.
Ditto. That was my favorite Tennant season, for the most part. I still hate what they did to Donna in the finale though.My view on Tate is that her performances reigned Tennant in a little so that he was 'Allons-y-ing' all over the place quite as much. For this reason alone, I much preferred the Tate/Tennant dynamic and the 4th season in general to Tennant's previous seasons.
I thought "The 11th Hour" had that frantic feel to it. But I like this season (and Smith!) so much I really don't miss it.As for me, I'm enjoying Series Five so far. I miss the way everything felt so fast and immediate and big and bombastic during the RTD years, but I like Moffat's style, too. Still, it would be nice to have an episode or two that feels as frantic as RTD's episodes often did.
My view on Tate is that her performances reigned Tennant in a little so that he was 'Allons-y-ing' all over the place quite as much. For this reason alone, I much preferred the Tate/Tennant dynamic and the 4th season in general to Tennant's previous seasons.
And that's enough of that as well.Rose was a thick chav who was the feeble attempt at a love interest in RTD's attempt to turn DW into a soap opera.
Could you possibly bring yourself to spare everyone else your embrace of prejudiced, classist stereotypes against the working class?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.