^ That's no excuse!
Still doesn't explain why I knew Life on Mars? but not Ashes to Ashes, except maybe Life on Mars? is a classic and Ashes to Ashes isn't...
^ That's no excuse!
Loved how they went into the plans of Life on Mars series 3 and how they kept the same idea for Ashes to Ashes. I thought they came up with the Gene idea this season only.This might help
Just read that interview I am glad the US got the crappy ending because otherwise I think it would have ruined our show if they both had the same ending.So I was wondering, the truth Alex found out about her parents may not even be true?
Loved how they went into the plans of Life on Mars series 3 and how they kept the same idea for Ashes to Ashes. I thought they came up with the Gene idea this season only.This might help
Other than Sam listening to it when he got hit by the car I don't remember it being use, at least not prominently.I stand corrected. LOM wasn't the opening or closing credits music after all. I misremembered. And am pretty confused about this now. Hindsight may be 20/20, but hindsound is apparently not always so sharp.
Still, I'm pretty sure that LOM was used pretty heavily throughout the series itself, while Ashes to Ashes was really only featured in one episode of its series.
Hearts Filthy Lesson could work as the name for the 90s version. I know it's a stretch, but it's not as if they use the song in the theme anyway.1. OutsideThey couldn't do it anyway since Bowie didn't write anything good enough in the 90s.![]()
I refer you to post 288.
But they're not going to do a 90s version. The show is over, the story concluded. What on Earth would be the point except to bring back Gene Hunt as a hollow sham of a character?
Yeah, I was just arguing that you could get a decent Bowie song title for a 90s version. I certainly think they should leave it, of course. Ashes to Ashes wasn't nearly as good as Life on Mars, but we've had our conclusion now.But they're not going to do a 90s version. The show is over, the story concluded. What on Earth would be the point except to bring back Gene Hunt as a hollow sham of a character?
It was used to great effect at the end of series 1 and 2.Other than Sam listening to it when he got hit by the car I don't remember it being use, at least not prominently.I stand corrected. LOM wasn't the opening or closing credits music after all. I misremembered. And am pretty confused about this now. Hindsight may be 20/20, but hindsound is apparently not always so sharp.
Still, I'm pretty sure that LOM was used pretty heavily throughout the series itself, while Ashes to Ashes was really only featured in one episode of its series.
I can't see someone like Gene in the 90s police force.But they're not going to do a 90s version. The show is over, the story concluded. What on Earth would be the point except to bring back Gene Hunt as a hollow sham of a character?
Could pick up easily enough, right where it left off, with no jump to the 90s required. And what would be the point?
Well, none whatsoever if the continued ti play him just the same. That would indeed be a hollow sham.
But if Gene HAS been changed by the events at the end of A2A? Then not a sham. Old Gene had supposedly forgotten what was really going on. Was living in a deluded afterlife of his own making. Now, having been forced to face the truth, is Gene the same guy? I think not.
I'm thinking about a new Gene Hunt, who acts as a kind of spirit guide to freshly offed cops, and a foil for spirits like Keats, who would use the dead for their own purposes. Basically a series unlike either LOM or A2A, because the secret is no longer secret, but is out in the open, at least where Gene and the audience is concerned.
I stand corrected. LOM wasn't the opening or closing credits music after all. I misremembered. And am pretty confused about this now. Hindsight may be 20/20, but hindsound is apparently not always so sharp.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.