Garm Bel Iblis
Commodore
I've got a soft spot for "Profit and Lace."
lol
lol
Gul Dukat was always my favorite character, and he finally got his full episode. The result was brilliant acting by Marc and Avery and holy crap.... what an episode.
I might be one of the few who think that Far Beyond the Stars is over-rated. For my money, it's easily In The Pale Moonlight.
You're far from "few." Brooks' acting sucks at the end of "Far Beyond the Stars"--whereas in "In the Pale Moonlight," he gets the right balance.
For instance, I love anything connected to the Mirror Universe, so my inclination is to name every one of those, despite the general consensus against them.
How can you say that his acting sucked at the end of FBTS? Eh? Come again? I mean, suffering a nervous breakdown is not exactly neat, rational, or anything else like that. It's precisely because the end seems a bit out of place that the performance is so moving. If you saw a nervous breakdown happening for real, it could seem so out of place that you might even say that the person was over-acting.You're far from "few." Brooks' acting sucks at the end of "Far Beyond the Stars"--whereas in "In the Pale Moonlight," he gets the right balance.
Chimera is a majestic piece of storytelling that is almost mythical as far as the density of its themes are concerned.
How can you say that his acting sucked at the end of FBTS? Eh? Come again? I mean, suffering a nervous breakdown is not exactly neat, rational, or anything else like that. It's precisely because the end seems a bit out of place that the performance is so moving. If you saw a nervous breakdown happening for real, it could seem so out of place that you might even say that the person was over-acting.You're far from "few." Brooks' acting sucks at the end of "Far Beyond the Stars"--whereas in "In the Pale Moonlight," he gets the right balance.
When it first aired, I taped the episode, and then the next day I showed it to a very casual fan of the show. When Sisko broke down, he was genuinely moved. "Wow. That's good acting." That's what he said.
Resurrection was an interesting concept, but coming when it did after the Occupation Arc, it was kind of forgotten, and they didn't do all they could with the story anyway.
Gul Dukat was always my favorite character, and he finally got his full episode. The result was brilliant acting by Marc and Avery and holy crap.... what an episode.
I think it's a strong episode as well, though it would never get my vote for series' best. It suffers from a lot of criticism due to how Dukat was portrayed from that point on: many fans prefer the morally ambiguous Dukat from seasons 2-4 (roughly).
For me personally, In the Pale Moonlight, Chimera and Tacking Into the Wind are the episodes that immediately come to mind as high points.
In the Pale Moonlight is the quintessential DS9 episode insofar as it explores the limits of Star Trek's very premise, morally and intellectually speaking.
Chimera is a majestic piece of storytelling that is almost mythical as far as the density of its themes are concerned.
Tacking Into the Wind is DS9 firing on all cylinders as conflict between individuals decides the fate of the galaxy.
Duet, Far Beyond the Stars and The Visitor are very good, though I don't number them among my favorites.
There are a lot of great episodes, though, and picking the best is something of an exercise in futility: the show wouldn't be as good as it is if this were an easy task. Beyond that, part of what separates DS9 from other Trek shows is its on-going character and story arcs, which by nature can't really be captured within a single episode.
Resurrection was an interesting concept, but coming when it did after the Occupation Arc, it was kind of forgotten, and they didn't do all they could with the story anyway.
So, what are you saying here? That you would have liked to see more done with that story? I kind of felt that way too when I saw this one again last week. But, I'm not sure if a two-parter would have been a good thing for this paticular one. What do you think?
Yeah. But DS9 already went there with the Intendant. I never could see her as Kira from another universe, she always just seemed to be a completely different character played by the same actress. Which became the template for writing other characters in the MU - by just making them polar opposites of the prime universe characters: "Oh, wouldn't it be fun if Mirror Brunt was a nice guy, and Mirror Ezri was a thief and a 'bad girl'... Hey, how about we make her lesbian as well?"Resurrection was an interesting concept, but coming when it did after the Occupation Arc, it was kind of forgotten, and they didn't do all they could with the story anyway.
So, what are you saying here? That you would have liked to see more done with that story? I kind of felt that way too when I saw this one again last week. But, I'm not sure if a two-parter would have been a good thing for this paticular one. What do you think?
Definitely not a two-parter, there isn't that much mileage in resurrecting Bareil, mirror universe or not.
I actually just rewatched it in order to give a detailed enough answer, the actual plot isn't one of the more memorable plots in the series. The fact is, having Mirror Bareil be the polar opposite of his counterpart, having Kira fall for this new Bareil and then he betray her is all too predictable a story. We've seen with the example of Smiley that being a mirror character does not mean you have nothing in common with your Prime counterpart, and having a mirror character they're specifically writing an episode about to be completely opposite to Prime Bareil is lazy storytelling.
But DS9 already went there with the Intendant. I never could see her as Kira from another universe, she always just seemed to be a completely different character played by the same actress.
I don't agree. Passion and determination is not enough. I don't see Kira being completely self-centered, narcissistic and hedonistic; if the Intendant had any kind of cause she seemed to really believe in and fight for - say, crushing the Alliance's opponents or making Bajor stronger or showing those Terran scum their place - I would buy her as MU Kira, a ruthless despot and oppressor. But she didn't care for anything but her own power and her own pleasure. So no, I don't see her as another version of Kira.But DS9 already went there with the Intendant. I never could see her as Kira from another universe, she always just seemed to be a completely different character played by the same actress.
I can't say I agree. I thought part of the strength of the first crossover was that the characters we met were believable as warped versions of their counterparts. That's especially the case with the Intendant: basically she's got all of Kira's passion and determination, but none of her moral values and no higher cause: her libido is out of control.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.