I didn’t make the hesitant logical choice, to say no. 3D isn’t 3D its only an image with depth of field.
If true cinema 3D is going to make any forward future progress rather than, enhancing where it left off from with red and blue filters, it really needs to go far, far, far, far beyond anything that’s been done in the cinema before.
Now picture space! Space with its star field is all around you!
Now if the cameras can film forward backwards side to side and above and below and capture it like that, I might start to show some, interest in it.
Other than that, its just front focal image that hasn’t changed since cinema started. Oh, there might IMAX Omi-Max but still it doesn’t cover imaging as its seen in the real world.
I was up in, hot air balloon two weeks ago, and “wow” it’s better than any 3D 70mm IMAX! Peering over the edge and looking down and around and above, was just awesome!
For just any cinema to have true 3D would be impossible. it would have to be specially made cinema with the seating in the auditorium floating more or less with screen over the bottom part.
The sidewalls rear wall and ceiling would, all have to have transparent screen with a special sound system to match it.
Say 3 screen channel for fronts
3 screen channel for sidewalls
3 screen channel for overheard surround
3 screen channel for underneath
The blow surround would have narrow stereo perspective due to the seating being so close to the floor. Also the rear projection might be an issue with light casting over the audience, so its rather complex.
3 screen channel for rear back
That's my of how cinema 3D should be!
Other than that, I’m content with 2D!
