I hate Tim Burton's stuff. All the gothy stripey black and whitey stuff.
And i thought i was the only one. The thing that really irritates me about Tim Burton is when he takes other IP's and then Burton-izes them into the same stupid annoying pseudo-gothic crap.
Other choices would be Stargate. The film took a brilliant premise then made it incredibly dull. The only thing that makes it even slightly tolerable is James Spader's acting.
And Avatar. Cameron spent 12 years on that? And if the film wasn't disappointing enough, the fact that its spawned a new 3D fad gives me further reason to dislike it.
"Brazil" sucks and is not as deep as people think. "Twelve Monkeys" is the far superior Terry Gilliam movie...it has all the depth and clarity of storytelling and characterization that overrated mess lacks. "The Third Man" is also painfully boring, except for the Orson Welles scenes. "Slacker" was torture to watch, and the worst movie watching experience of my life. The fact that it has fans and a Criterion Collection releasesickens me.
I hate Tim Burton's stuff. All the gothy stripey black and whitey stuff.
And i thought i was the only one. The thing that really irritates me about Tim Burton is when he takes other IP's and then Burton-izes them into the same stupid annoying pseudo-gothic crap.
Other choices would be Stargate. The film took a brilliant premise then made it incredibly dull. The only thing that makes it even slightly tolerable is James Spader's acting.
And Avatar. Cameron spent 12 years on that? And if the film wasn't disappointing enough, the fact that its spawned a new 3D fad gives me further reason to dislike it.
I agree. Tim Burton has to be the single most unoriginal person in the film industry. All we ever get from him is gothed-out crap, with Johnny Depp as the lead, and Danny Elfman doing the music. And Christina Ricci as the female lead. God forbid Burton ever do anything fresh and original. I truly cannot stand his work.
"V For Vendetta" is a masterpiece and I'm ready to argue about it for the next day, the next year or the next 500 yearsI'll just declare V for Vendetta the worst movie I've ever seen (and I watched Twilight, well, the rifftrax at least). What a piece of shit!![]()
I also think "Blade Runner" is all surface, no substance. People say the whole replicants and humans relationship has some deep statement to make about human nature, but I just don't see it. All I see is Harrison Ford running around trying to solve some mystery I can't be brought to give two shits about and an original futuristic world that's more neat to look at than anything that happens in it is to think about.
Don't forget Helena Bonham Carter!
How many movies has she been in where she wasn't in some sort of Victorian period clothing?
I guess Fight Club. Maybe that's it!![]()
And i thought i was the only one. The thing that really irritates me about Tim Burton is when he takes other IP's and then Burton-izes them into the same stupid annoying pseudo-gothic crap.
Other choices would be Stargate. The film took a brilliant premise then made it incredibly dull. The only thing that makes it even slightly tolerable is James Spader's acting.
And Avatar. Cameron spent 12 years on that? And if the film wasn't disappointing enough, the fact that its spawned a new 3D fad gives me further reason to dislike it.
I agree. Tim Burton has to be the single most unoriginal person in the film industry. All we ever get from him is gothed-out crap, with Johnny Depp as the lead, and Danny Elfman doing the music. And Christina Ricci as the female lead. God forbid Burton ever do anything fresh and original. I truly cannot stand his work.
Don't forget Helena Bonham Carter!
How many movies has she been in where she wasn't in some sort of Victorian period clothing?
I guess Fight Club. Maybe that's it!
Oh, reimnds me that I hate "Fight Club"... some sort of manifesto for rich white hipsters.
Which one of his films has Cristina Ricci ever been in? I cannot think of a single one.I agree. Tim Burton has to be the single most unoriginal person in the film industry. All we ever get from him is gothed-out crap, with Johnny Depp as the lead, and Danny Elfman doing the music. And Christina Ricci as the female lead. God forbid Burton ever do anything fresh and original. I truly cannot stand his work.
Which one of his films has Cristina Ricci ever been in? I cannot think of a single one.I agree. Tim Burton has to be the single most unoriginal person in the film industry. All we ever get from him is gothed-out crap, with Johnny Depp as the lead, and Danny Elfman doing the music. And Christina Ricci as the female lead. God forbid Burton ever do anything fresh and original. I truly cannot stand his work.
Amen and hallelujah! Will Ferrell is the unfunniest "comic" actor since . . . well, since Adam Sandler. Or Pauly Shore. And Owen Wilson is exactly the same in every picture he's in. He always makes me think he just lost his surfboard.Anything with Jack Black, Will Ferrell, Ben Stiller or Owen Wilson.
THE LORD OF THE RINGS: I never got past the first movie because it was dull, and talky, and just utterly non-entertaining.
You and I are of a kind.
I've had passionate debates with people online and in person about "The Thing" (1982). I just don't get what the fuss is all about. People tell me about how it's some science fiction masterpiece with powerful ideas and insights about paranoia and an incredible atmosphere, but all I see is a shallow monster movie with forgettable nothing characters.
The only things I liked about it were how delightfully over-the-top and creative the special effects on the creature were in their grotesqueness and one line, "You've got to be fucking kidding me!". That line and all the scenes where the creature goes through brilliantly sick and gross transformations are awesome, but they alone are not enough to make this a great movie.
John Carpenter's version is more faithful to the original story, but the 1951 film directed by Chris Nyby (under the tutelage of Howard Hawks, who reputedly personally directed some scenes) is much more fun to watch. It's also of cultural interest, of course, as the first of the Cold War “alien invasion as metaphor for the Communist menace” sci-fi pictures.. . . Both this movie and one made in the fifties called “The Thing From Another World” are based on the same short story by John W. Campbell. I wouldn't know either way cause I've never read it, but the fifties movie is ridiculously more entertaining. Though I actually liked the one you're talking about, I completely understand where you're coming from.
John Carpenter's version is more faithful to the original story, but the 1951 film directed by Chris Nyby (under the tutelage of Howard Hawks, who reputedly personally directed some scenes) is much more fun to watch. It's also of cultural interest, of course, as the first of the Cold War “alien invasion as metaphor for the Communist menace” sci-fi pictures.. . . Both this movie and one made in the fifties called “The Thing From Another World” are based on the same short story by John W. Campbell. I wouldn't know either way cause I've never read it, but the fifties movie is ridiculously more entertaining. Though I actually liked the one you're talking about, I completely understand where you're coming from.
“An intellectual carrot? The mind boggles!”
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.