![]()
And who can forget legos?I used to play a lot with these things.
![]()
And who can forget legos?I used to play a lot with these things.
The plural of Lego is Lego![]()
![]()
And who can forget legos?I used to play a lot with these things.
The plural of Lego is Lego![]()
People keep saying this, but why? I realize it's the brand name, and that the little pieces are actually called "bricks."
But what if I saw a bunch of Apple computers? Nobody would correct me if I said, "Look at all the Apples!"
The plural of Lego is Lego![]()
People keep saying this, but why? I realize it's the brand name, and that the little pieces are actually called "bricks."
But what if I saw a bunch of Apple computers? Nobody would correct me if I said, "Look at all the Apples!"
It's simply one of those words that is already plural.
If you saw a field filled with several moose in it would you say, "Look at all of the mosses!"
Everyone is wrong!I guess, but who decided "Lego" was the plural form of "Lego?"
I'm all about following grammar rules, but I want to know where they come from!
From the website of some guy that seems like an expert on the subject.Which is correct as the plural of LEGO:'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.