Re: Swiss government produces extra small condoms for boys as young as
Marc: ....There are some questions you'll never get a straight answer on, and the success rate of abstinence-only sex ed is one of them.
You'll never get a straight answer from either side. Nobody has really tried to do studies - and to be honest, I do not blame them, because controlling for every possible variable would be absolutely insane. Worthwhile, maybe, but insanely hard. And expensive.
The federal funding has been in the millions per year, though.
My whole view on this:
Condoms for 12-year-olds? Uhhh. I think of my cousins when they were 12 (I'm disabled, so me when I was 12 is not a useful measuring stick), and....I don't know whether to laugh or cry. 12 is too young for kids to be playing with fire like having sex inevitably is, IMHO. 14 isn't much better, but at least you're getting there. 16, to my mind, is the real minimum age where people of average cognitive development can really be said to consent knowledgably to sex.
And besides all that, did anyone spot the lengths they were quoting? 6 inches is the length of a fully-grown average guy. Where did they get their data from?
Actually, let me emphasize that. In order for them to make an "extra-small condom" to specs, they would have had to have gotten measurements.
In what non-squick way did they get measurements from 12-year-old boys?
Marc: ....There are some questions you'll never get a straight answer on, and the success rate of abstinence-only sex ed is one of them.
You'll never get a straight answer from either side. Nobody has really tried to do studies - and to be honest, I do not blame them, because controlling for every possible variable would be absolutely insane. Worthwhile, maybe, but insanely hard. And expensive.
The federal funding has been in the millions per year, though.
My whole view on this:
Condoms for 12-year-olds? Uhhh. I think of my cousins when they were 12 (I'm disabled, so me when I was 12 is not a useful measuring stick), and....I don't know whether to laugh or cry. 12 is too young for kids to be playing with fire like having sex inevitably is, IMHO. 14 isn't much better, but at least you're getting there. 16, to my mind, is the real minimum age where people of average cognitive development can really be said to consent knowledgably to sex.
And besides all that, did anyone spot the lengths they were quoting? 6 inches is the length of a fully-grown average guy. Where did they get their data from?
Actually, let me emphasize that. In order for them to make an "extra-small condom" to specs, they would have had to have gotten measurements.
In what non-squick way did they get measurements from 12-year-old boys?