Me and my brother agree to disagree on the racebending issue. At first I was pretty upset, however I came to realize that this is a american cartoon made for an american audience.
What's that got to do with anything? There are many Americans of Asian heritage. And America is supposed to be about inclusion and the celebration of diversity.
I do feel that since we have never seeen these characters in live action that there is room for interpretation. If they had painted Sokka and Katara's skin brown then I would be very upset. However portraying them as Scandinavians doesnt really bother me even though they are Inuit in the cartoon.
Having the fire nation as indian instead of Japanese is a interesting choice. Again I have no real complaints.
If this were only about the movie itself, I could agree that there's no harm in redefining some of the ground rules of the universe. I mean, I had no problem with a black Pete Ross and half-Chinese Lana Lang in
Smallville. But it feels like a symptom of a larger, more endemic problem in Hollywood, and it feels like a deliberate act of racial exclusion on Paramount's part, so it's hard to accept. It's also disquieting that the first film breaks down as heroes = white, villains = nonwhite, although that will be ameliorated in the sequels (particularly if Toph, like other Earth Kingdom characters, is cast as East Asian).
Noah himself looks like he has asian blood. In fact this is also what I have heard.
Where have you heard that? I've been unable to find any clear information on that point.
I am much worried about his acting capability. As I am about all the main characters.
Not just ability but appropriateness. I can't wrap my head around the idea of
The Daily Show's shrill-voiced Aasif Mandvi playing the film's primary villain. And Shaun Toub seems totally wrong for Iroh, though I've only seen him in
Iron Man.
Is this going to come up in EVERY discussion of the movie?
Probably, because it's important. Ethnicity is not a non-issue where A:TLA is concerned. This is one point that hasn't been raised yet, I think: the fact that one of the defining qualities of A:TLA is how progressive it is in its celebration of non-Western cultures. That progressiveness, that symbolism, is important. By analogy, imagine how
Star Trek fans would've reacted if J. J. Abrams had cast white actors as Sulu and Uhura. Those characters were landmarks because of the progressiveness of their casting, and that inclusion is fundamental to what ST is all about. So recasting them as white would've been rightly seen as an outrage. Well, a lot of A:TLA fans feel the same way about its inclusiveness, its status as an important step forward in the media's depiction of ethnic diversity. And as with Trek, that inclusiveness was an important part of the creators' intentions. That's why this is being reacted to as such a betrayal.