• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Gamer-What did you think? ***spoilers

broberfett

Vice Admiral
Admiral
I just saw this action flick with Gerard Butler(Leonidas from 300) and Michael C. Hall(Dexter). People's brains are rewired to be controlled remotely. Butler is in the soldier version of a game centered around the remote control humans. A rich kid controls him in real battles. I found it amusing. The sims idea was cool too and Dexter was pretty bizarre. Watch for Heroes' Peter Petrelli's weird part.
 
I thought it was one of the worst movies I've seen... a really bad execution of an interesting idea.
 
An interesting idea, with some excellent production design. But it was entirely destroyed in its execution, which sought to replicate the style of Crank without a reason (I won't say it replicates the style of Crank 2 High Voltage -- it never got that crazy). Michael C. Hall was amusing as the villain, but nothing special. A lot of good actors in small parts, too.
 
Even tho the idea sounds like a hoot, and the casting was interesting, everything I've heard suggests I should never bother to watch this train wreck.
Watch for Heroes' Peter Petrelli's weird part.
I'm curious about this...weird how?
 
I thought it was one of the worst movies I've seen... a really bad execution of an interesting idea.

It certainly wasn't a chick flick.... but then...
I don't think the producers created it as such...

Well, I'm not a chick and I never thought it was a chick flick so I'm not sure what you're talking about here. :lol:

I just thought the director did an awful job and the acting or action sequences were not that great too.
Amber Valletta's ass was nice though :p
 
Even tho the idea sounds like a hoot, and the casting was interesting, everything I've heard suggests I should never bother to watch this train wreck.
Watch for Heroes' Peter Petrelli's weird part.
I'm curious about this...weird how?

Weird as in frantically struggling to release his Johnson weird.

Are you being facetious or did they actually write that in a scene? :rommie:
 
Even tho the idea sounds like a hoot, and the casting was interesting, everything I've heard suggests I should never bother to watch this train wreck.
I'm curious about this...weird how?

Weird as in frantically struggling to release his Johnson weird.

Are you being facetious or did they actually write that in a scene? :rommie:

I didn't describe all the weirdness, but I'm not joking about him reaching for his tallywacker in a prolonged fashion.
 
This not the sort of movie I usually like...I don't watch a lot of straight action movies either, so to me, this movie seemed particularly violent..but I don't have a lot to compare it to. Still it surprised me...the casting was quite good, the cinematography interesting, and the story was genuinely more demanding than the avg SF action movie...I really loved the idea of a reality show/avatar and thought it was presented well...the shots inside the player's room were a realistic presentation of what futuristic internet absorption might be like (loved the 360 degree views). Just really surprised by this one..almost passed it by. 7 out of 10 stars.

RAMA
 
I enjoyed the production design. The story was pretty stupid. The directing was a bit headache-inducing. Some parts were campy and hilarious, including Peter Petrelli acting like a meth-addled robot (or trying to release his Johnson, as broberfett put it). :lol:

It's the kind of thing you'd want to watch with friends so you can riff on it and just have a good time. It's a delightfully terrible movie.
 
I thought it was okay, but I liked The Running Man better. Nobody gave a performance that I really cared about, the action was okay...I really liked the look of the film though. I liked how gritty the world of Slayers was, in contrast to the bright, plastic look of Society.
 
Weird as in frantically struggling to release his Johnson weird.

Are you being facetious or did they actually write that in a scene? :rommie:

I didn't describe all the weirdness, but I'm not joking about him reaching for his tallywacker in a prolonged fashion.

Between this, Heroes and that dumb movie about out of control medical students, methinks Milo needs to get himself another agent. :rommie:
Some parts were campy and hilarious, including Peter Petrelli acting like a meth-addled robot (or trying to release his Johnson, as broberfett put it).
Stop it! You people are tempting me to rent this dumbass thing out of sheer depraved curiosity. :rommie: Which is how I ended up wasting two hours of my life (well maybe 45 minutes considering fast forwarding) on that dumb movie about out of control medical students.
 
I remember Maggie Lawson looking damn good as a brunette and saying somethings I doubt we'll hear coming out of Jules' mouth. Other than that it..well....really sucked.
 
Well my coupla days stretched into a coupla months there. :rommie: I found a few other movies more worth my while in the meantime (such as The African Queen).

Overall: not nearly as bad as Milo's insane medical students movie. I managed to watch the whole thing without a finger even hovering over the fast-forward button. :bolian:

When you're forewarned what a brainless crapfest it is, it's fairly watchable. Michael C. Hall obviously had a blast playing a giggling creep that would give Dexter Morgan the heebie-jeebies. Gerald Butler was good in a grunting, personality-free action role; this is where he belongs, not in rom-coms!

I thought it was a tad unkind what he did to poor Milo, considering he was just another Society pawn; the guy (or gal) that Gerald should have killed was sitting safely in a game room somewhere. You'd think he'd have been a bit more sensitive about that. How'd he like the family members of some of his victims to come after him for revenge? Better to send them after our Spiderman-elect who was actually doing the killing...

And speaking of that, I was incredulous that Logan Lerman's character was treated in such a sympathetic way by this movie! He's really a bigger villain than Ken Castle. It's rich idiots like him who keep this corrupt and disgusting game going.

Lerman's character is much more reprehensible than, say, the fat tub o' lard who is merely directing Amber Valetta to have sex with random guys (no girls? now I know this is sci fi! :rommie:). Amber's character must have known the job was essentially prostitution when she took it. She really couldn't find any other way to support herself? Eh.

Contrast that with Lerman's character - getting an innocent man into situations where he had to kill or be killed. He wasn't there by choice. Yet the cute, blue-eyed kid gets to be the big hero at the end and the tub o' lard is presumably whacked by tech support. Hollywood morality at its finest.

And then there's Hollywood logic. Apparently if you have a good "puppet" like Kabel, the player is a hindrance. So the game naturally would have evolved to players who are merely the owners of talented puppets, more like the owners of a horse in a horse race. That kinds spoils the logic of the game altogether, if the people paying to play are so useless.

Oh well, that's far more thought than this movie deserves. Like The Box, there was a good movie in there somewhere, but it's too much effort to figure out how to fix such a total trainwreck.
 
I'm sorry you weren't able to see it without knowing anything about Milo being in it at all. I got a comedy/shock value thing seeing him and then him being killed. I tried to just mention him being in it without giving away too much at first.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top