• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Did Kirk's rather *enthusiastic* execution of Nero bug you?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Captain Kirk was simply never written as a saint or a very noble character. Perhaps that's the reason why so many fans like him, because they can identify with him at some point (nobody's perfect after all).
 
Huh? My take on Kirk is that his moral landscape was cleverly crafted to that his immorality was the who-cares stuff - skirt chasing, cheating on stupid academy tests, he probably smoked pot too :rommie: - but that the areas in which his morality was rigid were comparatively far more important - upholding Federation ideals even when inconvenient, worrying about the good of his crew, being harder on himself than anyone else, being compassionate when a lesser person would have been vengeful.

The genius behind how Kirk was written - and should be written going forward - was that he is a highly moral person without ever being off-putting or distancing, you know, "better than us." He only sweats the big stuff.

The Nero incident might be a mistake, but when I saw the film, it didn't jump out at me as such. On the contrary, I thought it was a nice Kirk-like moment for him to try to talk Nero away from the cliff edge. That was the moment at which I really felt, finally, that I was seeing a guy who I could accept as the "real" Kirk, despite the differences in how he might have started out as a character.
 
I loved the scene and didn't really think it was "out of character" for Kirk in the least. Did it bug me? Not really. I thought that it was interesting (and unexpected) that he even TRIED to offer Nero assistance- despite all that Nero had done up to that point (killing his father, destroying several Federation starships, destroying Vulcan, and threatening Earth) he STILL thought that saving Nero and his crew was something that could lead to a greater good in the future (i.e. peace between the Federation and Romulus). Nero, predictably, "spat" in his eye and Kirk ordered him finished off, which didn't seem totally unreasonable given that they needed to make sure the Narada was finished off once and for all and they didn't have enough time to try to change Nero's mind.
 
Last edited:
Spock (In any Universe) can be pretty cold at times. He suggested Kirk kill Gary Mitchell. ( and he was right then too.)

he also wanted kirk to kill the horta.


and not only do we have kirk from search from spock .
we also have kirk in taste of armageddon to see how far kirk is willing to go.
 
Spock (In any Universe) can be pretty cold at times. He suggested Kirk kill Gary Mitchell. ( and he was right then too.)

he also wanted kirk to kill the horta.


and not only do we have kirk from search from spock .
we also have kirk in taste of armageddon to see how far kirk is willing to go.
Yep, General Order 24. (torch the whole planet)
 
Hmm, Kirk's reaction didn't bug me as much as Spock's parting comment did. Yes, yes, I know Nero screwed everyone without the forethought of lube and everyone was hurting, but Spock's little flippant comment really jumped out at me. Hey, I understand, man, but still... Maybe it could have been worded a bit differently? *shrugs*

One love, Spock. One love, man!
 
I'm trying to figure out what makes people think the Narada was unable to fire their weapons. As long as they had weapons they were a threat.

Threats with big guns who refuse to surrender have to be shot, last time I checked.
 
As far as Kirk in general, in VI, he was still grieving the loss of David, still bitter, and angry...but he did his duty and played the role of diplomat with Gorkon and co...even when his every cell wanted to be anywhere but there. He said in his log dictation just before Valeris came in, words that indictated a willingness to acknowledge the rightness of what Spock was doing, despite his own pain and anger...and no, in XI, ChrisPineKirk was smiling not because he'd just finished Nero, but because they had 'cheated death', and won the day....
 
I look at Spock's "No, not really. Not this time." was the one time he gave in to his feelings.

He was not advocating murder, but disparaging that he would be saving the man responsible for destroying his home world, and killing his mother.

Given what Nero had done, I don't blame him one bit for this one lapse of logic.

Kirk, however, was truly stepping into his role as Captain, a soldier, diplomat and a representative of the Federation.

He wanted Nero gone, and for good reason, so he didn't shed a tear when Nero refused his offer of help. "You Got it" in this case means "Whatever you want. We're done here."
 
I'm going to have to jump on board with the 'Kirk did the right thing' crowd. He offered his hand, got the finger in return, made sure the threat was neutralized. I just watched it the other night, and don't recall him smilling until after they dumped the warp cores and were thrown free, and that was more of a 'whew, we made it' than anything else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top