• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Decline of Hollywood Movies

why are 90% of films aimed at kids today so damn LOUD AND SEIZURE INDUCING? sitting through the trailer reel before Princess and the Frog last week was excrutiating...
 
It is as realistic to expect Hollywood to be concerned only with creativity and art as it is to expect a government to be concerned only with the protection of the life, liberty and property of its people.
 
The Maltese Falcon was a remake.

The Godfather Part II, arguably one of the greatest films of all time, was, obviously, a sequel.

YOU LIE!!!

There's actually a really good Roger Ebert article about this and the fact that people were saying the same thing in the late 80's/early-90's (no, really?). I wish I could find it online and send it to you.

He basically disagrees with the sentiment, and I do, too.
 
Hollywood is not to blame. I blame you people for any decline in quality that may be occurring. If you don't pay to see it they stop making it. If you pay they make more. Whatever schlock Hollywood is making now is mainly your fault-if you'd stop paying to go and see it maybe things will change. The pure capitalism of the movie industry is the only true democracy-consider carefully before casting your vote.
 
The only time period where Hollywood made any commitment to originality was in the late 1960s and early 1970s. And during that period, it was only because the studio system of the 1950s was in shambles and they felt that small, low-budget, personal movies could result in very profitable returns with little investment. Once Star Wars, Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Raiders of the Lost Ark hit (and Heaven’s Gate didn’t) Hollywood shifted to high-concept, big-budget pictures that could appeal to the lowest common denominator and make boatloads of money. And the most profitable of these movies turned out to be franchises: sequels and remakes.

If you're looking for originality in cinema, Hollywood has almost never been the place to find it.
 
I blame you people for any decline in quality that may be occurring.

Okay I confess. It's mostly me. When I'm not goofing around here, I spend all my time going to see the worst movies possible. :( Due to my supernatural powers over the space/time continuum I managed to see All About Steve and Transformers 2 11,345 times apiece.
 
Hollywood is not to blame. I blame you people for any decline in quality that may be occurring. If you don't pay to see it they stop making it. If you pay they make more. Whatever schlock Hollywood is making now is mainly your fault-if you'd stop paying to go and see it maybe things will change. The pure capitalism of the movie industry is the only true democracy-consider carefully before casting your vote.

It's both.

I have been a little critical of how these blockbusters have gone. People are watching Transformers, Avatar...great SFx movies but terribly written movies.
 
I have been a little critical of how these blockbusters have gone. People are watching Transformers, Avatar...great SFx movies but terribly written movies.
Come now, like spectacle wasn't popular in the days of yore. When George Lucas included the Ben-Hur chariot race in The Phantom Menace, he was onto something as far as that continutiy went - the extravagant period pieces of yesteryear are the predecessors of the epic blockbusters today. Ben-Hur, The Ten Commandments, Avatar, Titanic, they're all a piece. Bloated extravagance in film goes all the way, way back to, uh, Italian pictures like Cabiria, which was then copied by D.W. Griffith's monumentally indulgent Intolerance. We love our epics!

And god bless Hollywood for them. I have Cleopatra on DVD. I've watched it many times. I like spectacle, damn it, I like seeing an atrium that's twice the size of a real thing and a fleet that at one point was the third largest in the world. Chamber dramas are all well and good, but once every so often (or more than that) we want our cast of thousands.

Right that said Transformers is terrible but that's because it's boring and I can't follow what the hell is going on; spectacle which is confusing is no spectacle at all.

Avatar though, I might go and see that again. That is an epic movie.
 
I blame you people for any decline in quality that may be occurring.
Okay I confess. It's mostly me. When I'm not goofing around here, I spend all my time going to see the worst movies possible. :( Due to my supernatural powers over the space/time continuum I managed to see All About Steve and Transformers 2 11,345 times apiece.

Damn you, Temis! Damn you all to Hell! :guffaw:;)
 
I would concede Hollywood has been making garbage as long as it's been making motion pictures, but the diamonds in the rough sure seem much fewer and further in between now. Very seldom am I compelled to go to the theater now, my preferred venue to see movies. Most of my movie watching hours are devoted to films made in a time when Hollywood sucked less.

I'm too lazy to attempt to quantify but I was just looking at the best picture Ocsar nominees over the decades and looking at the list I get the distinct impression that far fewer "great" films are made now.
 
I'm too lazy to attempt to quantify but I was just looking at the best picture Ocsar nominees over the decades and looking at the list I get the distinct impression that far fewer "great" films are made now.
God yeah, I envy the days of the Greatest Show on Earth and Oliver!, really do.

That said, has a better film than Sunrise ever won the Oscar? I'm not entirely sure, to my mind quite very possibly not.
 
I would concede Hollywood has been making garbage as long as it's been making motion pictures, but the diamonds in the rough sure seem much fewer and further in between now. Very seldom am I compelled to go to the theater now, my preferred venue to see movies. Most of my movie watching hours are devoted to films made in a time when Hollywood sucked less.

I'm too lazy to attempt to quantify but I was just looking at the best picture Ocsar nominees over the decades and looking at the list I get the distinct impression that far fewer "great" films are made now.
I think there are more films made each year than appear on the list of Oscar nominees. Some of the future great ones might not eve get nominated.
 
If you get a chance, look up Raymond Chandler's statements about Hollywood. He had some gems.

Its [Hollywood's] idea of "production value" is spending a million dollars dressing up a story that any good writer would throw away. Its vision of the rewarding movie is a vehicle for some glamour-puss with two expressions and eighteen changes of costume, or for some male idol of the muddled millions with a permanent hangover, six worn-out acting tricks, the build of a lifeguard, and the mentality of a chicken-strangler.

Raymond Chandler, 1945

ETA:

The Maltese Falcon was a remake.

Not only that, there were three adaptations of Hammett's novel between 1931-1941. Huston's famous film was the third.

I can only imagine the caterwauling that would go on if that sort of thing happened today.
 
I have been a little critical of how these blockbusters have gone. People are watching Transformers, Avatar...great SFx movies but terribly written movies.
Come now, like spectacle wasn't popular in the days of yore. When George Lucas included the Ben-Hur chariot race in The Phantom Menace, he was onto something as far as that continutiy went - the extravagant period pieces of yesteryear are the predecessors of the epic blockbusters today. Ben-Hur, The Ten Commandments, Avatar, Titanic, they're all a piece. Bloated extravagance in film goes all the way, way back to, uh, Italian pictures like Cabiria, which was then copied by D.W. Griffith's monumentally indulgent Intolerance. We love our epics!
How can you possibly compare an over-special effects'd piece of crap like The Phantom Menace to a classic like Ben-Hur? :wtf:

My grandmother saw Ben-Hur in the theatre - back when people actually had the requisite attention span to enjoy longer movies (there was an intermission part way through for bathroom/popcorn breaks). She tried to get me to watch it with her on TV, praising the chariot race as one of the best scenes in ANY movie EVER. It took me years to give in, though, since I'm not particularly fond of horses... but once I finally did see that movie, my jaw dropped and I was totally mesmerized by the chariot race. That whole segment of the movie is pure cinematic GENIUS.

There was a thread here some time back, over a year ago, in which some people stated they hated black-and-white movies. I don't get the hate for those - if the story is good, who cares about the color issue? Mind you, I suppose it's easier for those of us who weren't brought up with color TVs (I was 8 before we had a color TV).

Could modern Hollywood go back to making movies that didn't depend so much on the technical tricks? I doubt it. There doesn't seem to be much pure imagination or artistry there anymore.

Oh, and don't blame any of the crap movies on me - I haven't seen a movie in a theatre in almost 10 years.
 
I have been a little critical of how these blockbusters have gone. People are watching Transformers, Avatar...great SFx movies but terribly written movies.
Come now, like spectacle wasn't popular in the days of yore.

But the writing and acting have declined significantly. Even the crappy shows like the Last Starfighter, Little Monsters, stuff like that was fun to watch because it was engaging.

Hardly any of these blockbusters in the summer are hardly engaging anymore.
 
I have been a little critical of how these blockbusters have gone. People are watching Transformers, Avatar...great SFx movies but terribly written movies.
Come now, like spectacle wasn't popular in the days of yore.

But the writing and acting have declined significantly. Even the crappy shows like the Last Starfighter, Little Monsters, stuff like that was fun to watch because it was engaging.

Hardly any of these blockbusters in the summer are hardly engaging anymore.
Have they? Do You have something to back that up or are you just repeating the same tropes people have been spouting since movies began.

I'm sure by the second year of the movies, someone was saying "These aren't as good as last year. The acting and writing have gone down hill."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top