How can it be a forgery? He was an actual person and the events he writes about were also written about by others in other cultures..you mean you believe everything you google? Surely not..
Josephus was an actual person but his mention of Jesus was added by forgers. Nobody should take my word for it - not only am I not a not a scholar; history isn't even much of an interest of mine as a layman. But I can read.
No, I don't believe everything I find through Google but I do put a lot of stock in people who actually are expert in their fields. Scholars almost universally agree that the Josephus mention of Jesus is not only a forgery but a ridiculously transparent one.
Let's cut the crap. If you want to sell anyone on the historicity of Jesus, the most sure way to destroy your credibility is to cite Josephus. Anyone even casually familiar with it knows that it is bogus. The facts are easily available for anyone to find. Citing Josephus is an obvious sign that you either don't know what you are talking about or worse still, are being deliberately deceptive.