• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Stewart talks about domestic violence in his childhood

Captaindemotion

Admiral
Admiral
Not sure if this is the right forum to post it in, but it seems as good as any.

Patrick Stewart, aka Captain Jean-Luc Picard has written the following moving, if disturbing, article for the Guardian newspaper, about his father's abuse of his mother while Patrick was a child.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/nov/27/patrick-stewart-domestic-violence

My father was, in many ways, a man of discipline, organisation and charisma - a regimental sergeant major no less. One of the very last men to be evacuated from Dunkirk, his third stripe was chalked on to his uniform by an officer when no more senior NCOs were left alive. Parachuted into Crete and Italy, both times under fire, he fought at Monte Casino and was twice mentioned in dispatches. A fellow soldier once told me, "When your father marches on to the parade ground, the birds in the trees stop singing."
In civilian life it was a different story. He was an angry, unhappy and frustrated man who was not able to control his emotions or his hands. As a child I witnessed his repeated violence against my mother, and the terror and misery he caused was such that, if I felt I could have succeeded, I would have killed him. If my mother had attempted it, I would have held him down. For those who struggle to comprehend these feelings in a child, imagine living in an environment of emotional unpredictability, danger and humiliation week after week, year after year, from the age of seven. My childish instinct was to protect my mother, but the man hurting her was my father, whom I respected, admired and feared.
From Monday morning to Friday tea time he worked as a semi-skilled labourer, and was diligent and sober. Often funny and charming, he was always rich in the personal stories of warfare and adventure that thrilled me. But come Friday night, after the pubs closed, we awaited his return with trepidation. I would be in bed but not asleep. I could never sleep until he did; while he was awake we were all at risk. Instead, I would listen for his voice, singing, as he walked home. Certain songs were reassuring: I'll Take You Home Again, Kathleen; I'll Walk Beside You . . . But army songs were not a good sign. And worst of all was silence. When I could only hear footsteps it was the signal to be super-alert.
Our house was small, and when you grow up with domestic violence in a confined space you learn to gauge, very precisely, the temperature of situations. I knew exactly when the shouting was done and a hand was about to be raised – I also knew exactly when to insert a small body between the fist and her face, a skill no child should ever have to learn. Curiously, I never felt fear for myself and he never struck me, an odd moral imposition that would not allow him to strike a child. The situation was barely tolerable: I witnessed terrible things, which I knew were wrong, but there was nowhere to go for help. Worse, there were those who condoned the abuse. I heard police or ambulancemen, standing in our house, say, "She must have provoked him," or, "Mrs Stewart, it takes two to make a fight." They had no idea. The truth is my mother did nothing to deserve the violence she endured. She did not provoke my father, and even if she had, violence is an unacceptable way of dealing with conflict. Violence is a choice a man makes and he alone is responsible for it.
No one came to help. No adult stepped in and took charge. I needed someone else to take over and tell me everything was going to be all right and that it wasn't my fault. I wanted the anger to go away and, while it stayed, I felt responsible. The sense of guilt and loneliness provoked by domestic violence is tainting – and lasting. No one came, but everyone knew. Our small houses were close together. Every Monday morning I walked to school with my head down, praying that I would not encounter a neighbour or school friend who had heard the weekend's rows. I felt ashamed.
Very occasionally one person would come to our aid – Mrs Dixon, our next-door neighbour, the only person who would stand up to my father. She would throw open the door and stand before him, bosom bursting and her mighty weaver's forearm raised in his face. "Come on, Alf Stewart," she would say, "have a go at me." He never did. He calmed down and went to bed. Now I wish I could take Lizzie Dixon's big hand in mine and thank her.
Such experiences are destructive. In my adult life I have struggled to overcome the bad lessons of my father's behaviour, this corrosive example of male irresponsibility. But the most oppressive aspect of these experiences was the loneliness. Very recently, during a falling-out with my girlfriend, I felt again as though I were shut out and alone, not heard or understood. I was neither, but it was such a familiar isolation that it was almost a comfort and consolation.
I managed to find my own refuge in acting. The stage was a far safer place for me than anything I had to live through at home – it offered escape. I could be someone else, in another place, in another time. However, whenever the role called for anger, fury, or the expression of murderous impulses, I was always afraid of what I might unleash if I surrendered myself to those feelings. It was not until 1981, when the director Ronald Eyre asked me to play the psychotic Leontes in The Winter's Tale, that the breakthrough came.
He quietly told me that the play would only work if I gave myself over, completely and totally, to the delusions, madness and murderousness of this man. "If you do that," Ron said, "I will be at your side. I will be available to you 24 hours a day." From that time forward I was never again afraid of my feelings on stage.
The truth is that domestic violence touches many of us. It is very possible that someone you know – a friend, sister, daughter or colleague – is experiencing abuse. One in four women will experience domestic violence at some point in her lifetime. And every week two women are killed by a current or former partner in England and Wales, and 10 women take their own lives as the only way they know how to escape a violent partner. You are almost certainly paying for it. Domestic violence costs around £26bn a year in medical, legal and housing costs.
This violence is not a private matter. Behind closed doors it is shielded and hidden and it only intensifies. It is protected by silence – everyone's silence. Which is why, in 2007, I became patron of Refuge, the national domestic violence charity. Every day the organisation supports more than 1,000 women and children through its national network of refuges and services. At Refuge, women and children are given psychological support to help them overcome the trauma of abuse. A team of independent legal advocates are on hand to protect women at high risk of violence through the legal process.
Thanks to Refuge's tireless campaigning, attitudes have changed. Police tactics have improved and most men are no longer able to get away with beating women. Yet the statistics still make for grim reading. More than two thirds of the residents in Refuge's network of refuges are children. I cannot express how sad – and angry – it makes me to think that we still cannot ensure the safety of women and children in their own homes.
Most people find the idea of violence against women – and sometimes, though rarely, against men - abhorrent, but do nothing to challenge it. More women and children, just like my mother and me, will continue to experience domestic violence unless we all speak out against it. You can do this by supporting Refuge's latest campaign, Four Ways To Speak Out.

On a brighter note, there's a cute pic of Mr Stewart as a baby!
 
Yeah I read that in the paper this morning, it was quite a powerful piece, I thought, and something I didn't know about the good captain. The most vile part of domestic violence is the deafening silence that tends to accompany it. At least these days the attitude of those in authority has largely changed. However, you still hear casual remarks about women 'pissing off' their husbands and all-but-condoning slapping them around because of it.

Refuge are a brilliant charity, I am glad to see Patrick Stewart supports their work.
 
Wow. Reading this made me speechless. How horrible for him. Mr. Steward deserves great credit for overcoming the scars from such a childhood. I wish I could hug him right now.
 
Sounds similar to the white ribbon campaign here in Canada http://www.whiteribbon.ca/

My favorite band ever, The Tea Party, played a big role in getting them off the ground and they used their song "Release" in a number of fund raisers, awareness campaigns and benefit concerts.

It's interesting that Patrick, whom was a part of my favorite show growing up would be in a similar organization.

And it's also good to hear that he can come forward and be open about such a past, because the more people expose these type of situations, the more easier it is to not just become more aware of it, but to gain more support against pig headed jerks who only seem to try and solve their issues with violence.
 
A shame he doesn't give a crap about the men who are victims.

OFFS

He's talking about his personal experiences. In his case, as in the majority of cases, the abuser was a man. He does mention as an aside that male victims are in the minority, which may rankle with a group who have problems with being marginalised, but he's not silent on the issue. More importantly than that, he's outing himself - a man - as a survivor of emotional domestic abuse. So I think, yeah, he probably gives a shit.

Dismissing people who do talk about domestic abuse because you don't think they're doing it the right way is another silencing technique and helps absolutely nobody.
 
Last edited:
Ironically, his childhood scars helped propel him to success as an actor. He even acknowledges this. Some of the most creative people use their pain to express their genius. As Spock would say: Fascinating.
 
A shame he doesn't give a crap about the men who are victims.

OFFS

He's talking about his personal experiences. In his case, as in the majority of cases, the abuser was a man. He does mention as an aside that male victims are in the minority, which may rankle with a group who have problems with being marginalised, but he's not silent on the issue. More importantly than that, he's outing himself - a man - as a survivor of emotional domestic abuse. So I think, yeah, he probably gives a shit.

Dismissing people who do talk about domestic abuse because you don't think they're doing it the right way is another silencing technique and helps absolutely nobody.

No. Male victims are not a minority, nor is it true that men are the majority of abusers. Women abuse men and children (and women) as often as men abuse women and children (and men). Any and all studies NOT performed by radical feminists in the last 20 years have demonstrated that men and women are equally likely to be abusers and equally likely to be victims. If either you or Stewart can't distinguish between reality and feminist propaganda, that isn't my fault. And don't you DARE suggest I'm encouraging silence. YOU are the one doing that, saying I should be silent about the blatant mistruths Stewart- and you- are spreading, those that prevent action being taken to give men equal protection to women. Do you have any clue how few shelters for battered men there are?

Still, go ahead and spout your ideology and sweep the truth under the carpet. I'm used to it by now.
 
^Do you have a reference to a study to back your claim that men are victims of domestic abuse as much as women? I'm not saying you're wrong; I'd just like to see the data.
 
^Do you have a reference to a study to back your claim that men are victims of domestic abuse as much as women? I'm not saying you're wrong; I'd just like to see the data.

I can't give you a link, no, but check out any study of the last 20 years not performed by a radical feminist group and it will pretty much support what I'm saying. Alternatively, if people bothered to access the websites, blogs and so on dedicated to these issues, THEY will give you links and references (that's where I read about it, and yes, the sites did have references and links aplenty).

I do not want this board being used to spread blatant lies about serious issues.
 
^ So we're meant to take your word for it without a shred of evidence to back it up? Oh, get real! :rolleyes:

GO ONTO THE BLOODY SITES AND READ IT YOURSELF. ANYWAY, SINCE THE FRIGGIN EVIDENCE HAS BEEN THERE FOR 20 BLOODY YEARS AND YOU STILL BELIEVE THE FEMINIST PARTY LINE WITHOUT A SHRED OF TRUTH BEHIND IT, WHERE YOU GET THE GALL TO GIVE THAT OBNOXIOUS EYE ROLL i DON'T KNOW.

I'M SO FRIGGIN SORRY I DARED TO BRING THESE MISTRUTHS TO YOUR ATTENTION

I suppose you think battered men are just crybabies who should "man up", eh?

Do some damn research, actually- gasp!- go onto sites dedicated to issues like this and read the evidence and the studies for yourself. If you can bear turning the feminist drip-feed off and actually consider the issue from all angles, that is.
 
A shame he doesn't give a crap about the men who are victims.

OFFS

He's talking about his personal experiences. In his case, as in the majority of cases, the abuser was a man. He does mention as an aside that male victims are in the minority, which may rankle with a group who have problems with being marginalised, but he's not silent on the issue. More importantly than that, he's outing himself - a man - as a survivor of emotional domestic abuse. So I think, yeah, he probably gives a shit.

Dismissing people who do talk about domestic abuse because you don't think they're doing it the right way is another silencing technique and helps absolutely nobody.

Agreed... be thankful he's willing to bring attention to some form of violence, as he has no obligation to do so and could have very well kept his mouth shut over his own experiences..... you just can't please everybody it seems.
 
A shame he doesn't give a crap about the men who are victims.

OFFS

He's talking about his personal experiences. In his case, as in the majority of cases, the abuser was a man. He does mention as an aside that male victims are in the minority, which may rankle with a group who have problems with being marginalised, but he's not silent on the issue. More importantly than that, he's outing himself - a man - as a survivor of emotional domestic abuse. So I think, yeah, he probably gives a shit.

Dismissing people who do talk about domestic abuse because you don't think they're doing it the right way is another silencing technique and helps absolutely nobody.

Agreed... be thankful he's willing to bring attention to some form of violence, as he has no obligation to do so and could have very well kept his mouth shut over his own experiences..... you just can't please everybody it seems.

And I've already answered this.

You deniers may want to keep the issue in the dark, or maybe you're just ignorant, I don't know, but as someone who takes violence extremely seriously, I cannot tolerate your mistruths and attempts to deny victimization.

And, no, lies do not "please" me, nor does denial of violence.
 
No. Male victims are not a minority, nor is it true that men are the majority of abusers. Women abuse men and children (and women) as often as men abuse women and children (and men). Any and all studies NOT performed by radical feminists in the last 20 years have demonstrated that men and women are equally likely to be abusers and equally likely to be victims. If either you or Stewart can't distinguish between reality and feminist propaganda, that isn't my fault. And don't you DARE suggest I'm encouraging silence. YOU are the one doing that, saying I should be silent about the blatant mistruths Stewart- and you- are spreading, those that prevent action being taken to give men equal protection to women. Do you have any clue how few shelters for battered men there are?

Still, go ahead and spout your ideology and sweep the truth under the carpet. I'm used to it by now.

Oh please, cry me a ditch..... I'm probably one of the bigger mouths on the internet towards equality towards men over the years, and I'm usually one of the first to point out discrimination towards men due to various feminist and other groups who seem to want to leap beyond just equality, but unless you actually provide sources to your above claims about it all being on par, you're just ranting with no substance.

I've come accross some information that could support your claims, but overall information is varied on background reasons.

Regardless, both forms of abuse from one gender or the other should be stopped and addressed.... Patrick and others have started their own groups for the support against violence towards women.

Rather then bitching and complaining that they're not covering every gender in a way you'd like, how about you step up to the plate, put your money where your mouth is, and start up your own organization in support for your own cause of protecting men from domestic violence?
 
No. Male victims are not a minority, nor is it true that men are the majority of abusers. Women abuse men and children (and women) as often as men abuse women and children (and men). Any and all studies NOT performed by radical feminists in the last 20 years have demonstrated that men and women are equally likely to be abusers and equally likely to be victims. If either you or Stewart can't distinguish between reality and feminist propaganda, that isn't my fault. And don't you DARE suggest I'm encouraging silence. YOU are the one doing that, saying I should be silent about the blatant mistruths Stewart- and you- are spreading, those that prevent action being taken to give men equal protection to women. Do you have any clue how few shelters for battered men there are?

Still, go ahead and spout your ideology and sweep the truth under the carpet. I'm used to it by now.

Oh please, cry me a ditch..... I'm probably one of the bigger mouths on the internet towards equality towards men over the years, and I'm usually one of the first to point out discrimination towards men due to various feminist and other groups who seem to want to leap beyond just equality, but unless you actually provide sources to your above claims about it all being on par, you're just ranting with no substance.

I've come accross some information that could support your claims, but overall information is varied on background reasons.

Regardless, both forms of abuse from one gender or the other should be stopped and addressed.... Patrick and others have started their own groups for the support against violence towards women.

Rather then bitching and complaining that they're not covering every gender in a way you'd like, how about you step up to the plate, put your money where your mouth is, and start up your own organization in support for your own cause of protecting men from domestic violence?

Maybe I'd take this seriously if you hadn't posted the "male victims are a minority and they can suck it up because they're men" post.

And I've cried a lot more than a "ditch", I can assure you.
 
^ So we're meant to take your word for it without a shred of evidence to back it up? Oh, get real! :rolleyes:

GO ONTO THE BLOODY SITES AND READ IT YOURSELF. ANYWAY, SINCE THE FRIGGIN EVIDENCE HAS BEEN THERE FOR 20 BLOODY YEARS AND YOU STILL BELIEVE THE FEMINIST PARTY LINE WITHOUT A SHRED OF TRUTH BEHIND IT, WHERE YOU GET THE GALL TO GIVE THAT OBNOXIOUS EYE ROLL i DON'T KNOW.

I'M SO FRIGGIN SORRY I DARED TO BRING THESE MISTRUTHS TO YOUR ATTENTION

I suppose you think battered men are just crybabies who should "man up", eh?

Do some damn research, actually- gasp!- go onto sites dedicated to issues like this and read the evidence and the studies for yourself. If you can bear turning the feminist drip-feed off and actually consider the issue from all angles, that is.

You haven't even named any of these Oracle-like, canonical, gospel truth 'sites.' Why should I go waste my time looking them up on your less-than-reliable word? And where does this Line In the Sand like figure of 20 years come from?

It's nothing to do with feminism and propaganda. It's a simple fact that men are stronger and bigger than women and are more likely to use violence. The bulk of violent and sexual offenders are men. That's not to dismiss violence by women against men - or any violence - but to pretend that it's as big a problem as male-on-female violence is simple nonsense, the sort of whinging, self-pitying and distorting crap spouted by the likes of Fathers 4 Justice.

I bet you think that Michael Chrichton's Disclosure is a realistic and cutting edge depiction of sexual harassment in the workplace. And have you perchance ever hung out on a motorway or landmark building in a superhero costume?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top