That's exactly the way I look at it...I don't believe Nero travelled back to the prime universe at all. This is a different timeline from the very start. In other words, this was another universe even before the destruction of the Kelvin. It allows Abrams to have a clean slate and do whatever he likes.
That's exactly the way I look at it...I don't believe Nero travelled back to the prime universe at all. This is a different timeline from the very start. In other words, this was another universe even before the destruction of the Kelvin. It allows Abrams to have a clean slate and do whatever he likes.
Once again: the explanation from Spock--that they bothered to have an explanation at all--is charity for the canon nazis, nothing more.It's actually neither. It doesn't ignore established continuity because Prime Spock is there and it's explained in the film that it's an alternate reality, so it's about as much of a reboot as an episode set in the Mirror Universe, and it doesn't take place before established events within that timeline, so it's not even a prequel.It's a reboot, not a prequel.
Sop fooling yourself. The writers knew exactly what they were doing: they were re-making Star Trek. Maybe YOU are confused about what they actually made, but the production team had an extremely clear idea what this was about. They've stated concisely that it IS an alternate reality and therefore anything can (or can not) happen.The indecisiveness from the writers on deciding on what it is they're actually making
That's exactly the way I look at it...I don't believe Nero travelled back to the prime universe at all. This is a different timeline from the very start. In other words, this was another universe even before the destruction of the Kelvin. It allows Abrams to have a clean slate and do whatever he likes.
I agree but I would also be interested to see how Abrams would handle some of the things. I mean he tryed to say that dispite everything that was different the people were still the same. Personally I want to see how this version of Kirk would deal with Khan.
I don't believe Nero travelled back to the prime universe at all. This is a different timeline from the very start. In other words, this was another universe even before the destruction of the Kelvin. It allows Abrams to have a clean slate and do whatever he likes.
We've seen other timelines before, albeit on a smaller scale. This is no different. There is precedent in Trek for this.
What Spock was implying is that that Nero's arrival had created an alternate reality -- a separate one which did not lead to the 24th century from which Nero came and in which, therefore, history would not necessarily play out in the same way as the (Prime-timeline) history Nero "knows". Thus, Nero would not be able to predict with any certainty the actions even of those people he had previously studied (i.e., Kirk, Spock) because the future of the alternate timeline and Nero's "known" future are connected only at a point (Narada's arrival via wormhole/white hole) now in the past of both timelines -- timelines which will tend to grow more divergent over time, like two branches growing in different directions from a fork of the same tree.Despite the fact that the younger Spock even said that Nero changed history coming back and whatever their destinies were before, they were now changed? Thus Young Spock was implying that they WERE in the prime universe that had been altered?
That bit's been done already, and quite thoroughly. It doesn't need to keep popping up in other threads.And we'd still get to see the NuDoomsday Machine, as well as the NuKelvins from Andromeda who are on their way.
If it's in the film, it's important, it matters. You can't just dismiss what's stated on film (and in interviews for that matter) because it doesn't fit with how you want things to be.Once again: the explanation from Spock--that they bothered to have an explanation at all--is charity for the canon nazis, nothing more.
They've stated it's an alternate timeline.Sop fooling yourself. The writers knew exactly what they were doing: they were re-making Star Trek. Maybe YOU are confused about what they actually made, but the production team had an extremely clear idea what this was about. They've stated concisely that it IS an alternate reality and therefore anything can (or can not) happen.
Somewhere along the way they got confused as to whether they were writing a reboot or a prequel
That's how I see it too. I just think that the writers either 'ignored' or just plain thought "fuck it" when dealing with certain aspects.They deliberate wrote a film that acted as a genuine sequel to "Nemesis" (and "Unification") and prequel to TOS, but also gelled with TNG's "Parallels". No confusion at all.
I guess you could say that 3000 years into the future of the nu-timeline, someone goes back in time and prevents the Voyager probe from being launched.
But then, would that create another alternate timeline and thus have no effect on the nu-timeline? Or does a new timeline only
occur when red matter is used?
We know this to be an entirely different universe where time is not synced up to the Prime universe because Nokia and the Beastie Boys did not exist in the Prime universe. Also, the prime universe had some sort of Eugenics Wars going on in the late 1990's that I can't recall at all.
That's exactly the way I look at it...I don't believe Nero travelled back to the prime universe at all. This is a different timeline from the very start. In other words, this was another universe even before the destruction of the Kelvin. It allows Abrams to have a clean slate and do whatever he likes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.