If I were to film the next Superman movie--assuming that a continuation of the Donnerverse is no longer on the table--I would make a period piece set in the 30's or 40's. I would give it a stylistic look reminiscent of the Fleischer cartoons.
The movie would portray Clark Kent as the disguise, not Superman.
The line between Clark Kent and Superman wasn't so clearly drawn in the early days of
Action Comics, Superman, and the daily strips. Two drawings, one done around the time of
Action #1 and another as a comic panel, have the caption: "Superman and Clark Kent one and the same." When Clark Kent wanted to get a story or go toe-to-toe with George Taylor-cum-Perry White, he was bold and mildly aggressive, like the George Reeves portrayal. It was only around Lois that Clark became the milquetoast.
Despite Mark Waid's assertion in his
Birthright afterward that Siegal and Shuster came up with the "disguised as a mild-mannered reporter" line, it really came out of the radio serial and the Fleschier cartoons. In order to distinguish more clearly between Clark and Superman, radio actor Bud Collier pitched Kent's voice higher and the character was a bit more introverted than in the comics and newspaper strips. Collier also played the role in the animated shorts, carrying over the same performance.
This idea that Kent was more disguise than anything else really came to fruition in the Silver Age and as more of Superman's Kryptonian heritage got explored, making him more and more alien.
The Golden-Age Superman, including variations based upon him, like Earth-2 Supes and New Frontier Supes, is my favorite iteration of the character. And I'd love to see a period piece film based on that version. In fact, I'd love to see an adaptation of Tom DeHaven's literary novel
It's Superman, which I think nails the period.
OK, so over the past few days I've been mulling over my proposed reboot of the Superman franchise, and instead I've devised a trilogy of films with the assistance of a friend.
(snipped for brevity)
I must say, some of your ideas are interesting and seem to truly engage and challenge some of the core concepts of the Superman mythos while reinterpreting them at the same time but paying homage to what has come before. Not too dissimilar to what Geoff Johns has done in the comics.
That is true. I just brought it up because I had heard that recent comics portrayed Superman as the disguise, which really doesn't appeal to me.
Not entirely. The awkwardness is there, but it isn't a complete rehash of the pre-Crisis Superman. It is a marrying of the the two concepts, really. Clark is still a person, but so is Superman, and yet they are one and the same. After reading
Superman: Secret Identity #1, Johns is playing with the dual identity, posing the questions of which is the real person and which is the facade and what if both are the real person.
Nrama: Geoff, Gary once told us that you were showing the "birth of Clark Kent" in these issues – how he becomes that awkward man named Clark while also being the world's greatest superhero. There's been a lot of discussion about "why" DC is telling a Superman origin now, but why is the "how he became Clark" side of the story so important to you – and to Superman – that you wanted to explore it in this story?
Johns: Clark Kent is awkward for a reason, and I wanted to explore that. He’s the most genuine person you’ll ever meet, but deep down, he doesn’t fit in. Regardless of his powers, when he comes to Metropolis, he’s a young man who was raised in Kansas moving to the big city, so there’s a bit of culture shock and awe that goes with that.
Source:
http://www.newsarama.com/comics/090930-Superman-Secret-Origin.html
In the same interview, this quote from artist Gary Frank is pertinent to this discussion of what people would do with the character.
Nrama: Did you two talk a lot about the overall vision of this series and what you wanted to communicate? How collaborative was this issue? Were you always on the same page in this story?
Gary Frank: We've been talking about this story off and on for at least a year. There are things that we've hashed out in conversations which have made it into the final cut, but I think it's clear that Geoff has had a pretty clear idea of what this project was going to be about from the beginning.
I think we both share the same vision as to how Superman should be portrayed. It's interesting because, if you get two fans of Superman talking on the subject of the various origins – which bits of Silver Age Supes are good, which bits of Man of Steel don't feel right, etc. – any consensus seems to be pretty short-lived. People have really diverse and passionately held convictions about how this character should be done.
Source:
http://www.newsarama.com/comics/090930-Superman-Secret-Origin.html