It;s in many parts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN10GykGKTQ
I'm watching part one and I wanted to post it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN10GykGKTQ
I'm watching part one and I wanted to post it
the longest youtube review of the film
- Thread starter Flying Spaghetti Monster
- Start date
Confused Matthew has a long review. He bascially completely trashes the film. Not surprising considering the fucktard hates anything that is good
I've tried watching Confused Matthew reviews and I just can't do it. He spends way too much time blathering about nothing at all, instead of cutting to the chase and actually giving a review. He desperately needs to sit down and watch how Gene Siskel used to say everything which needed to be said, clearly and concisely, in the space of two or three minutes. (I'm not going to say the same thing about Phantassm's* review, because I haven't watched it; I can't be the only one who finds the prospect of a review -- of a 126-minute movie -- running longer than sixty minutes to be a bit daunting.)
* To the OP: is this our Phantassm, by the way?
to be fair 80% of the review about the franchise in general and the oither films in particular
It'd be worth watching the whole thing if someone appeared behind him at the end and cracked a steel chair over the back of his head.
Just saying.
It was 1 minute 17 seconds before the review even started. What a fucktard.
Comparing his YouTube profile to his Trek BBS profile, this seems to be the case, yes.
I'm not sure if all of this is really necessary.
I just started watching the fourth part of his review and I must say that although it's kind of long drawn-out it's really nice, too. It's more or less a review of the whole film series, so that might explain the length. You can tell that he's very passionate about Star Trek and I think he's also a very likeable guy.
Yes, that was mentioned by the OP in Post #7.
barnaclelapse's comment, I'm pretty sure, is a joke playing on what happens at the end of most (all?) WWE/pro wrestling programs aired in the US for the last fifteen years or so; when someone got whacked with the folding chair, you knew this week's show was over - cut to commercial. You can even find a :chair: smiley on a lot of boards. (No, I didn't watch wrestling, but it was on just before Voyager on UPN over here, so I got to see the chair a lot.)
On the other hand, Chess Piece Face's critique was a bit harsh, but I don't think it's intended as a flame. I'll just advise him to bear in mind that it's a TrekBBS member he's talking about and to temper his comments accordingly.
^ Oh, it's not like I wanted to play mini-mod and point out offenses to you. I merely wanted to express my disapproval of such comments. The guy has just posted a rather lengthy review of a movie on the internet. In my opinion that hardly justifies calling him a fucktard.
But thanks for explaining the wrestling reference. I can see now how I took barnaclelapse's comment too seriously.
But thanks for explaining the wrestling reference. I can see now how I took barnaclelapse's comment too seriously.
I watched the whole thing. Yes I enjoyed it, and no I'm not too busy at the moment. He was quite entertaining. The only downside is that he likes the movie too much.
Incidentally, I found it hilarious the way he said "he loved the women" just after 3:20 in part 1. But that's the kind of thing I should get a youtube account to point out.
Incidentally, I found it hilarious the way he said "he loved the women" just after 3:20 in part 1. But that's the kind of thing I should get a youtube account to point out.
Comparing his YouTube profile to his Trek BBS profile, this seems to be the case, yes.
I'm not sure if all of this is really necessary.
I just started watching the fourth part of his review and I must say that although it's kind of long drawn-out it's really nice, too. It's more or less a review of the whole film series, so that might explain the length. You can tell that he's very passionate about Star Trek and I think he's also a very likeable guy.
Well, I'm just teasing. I don't actually want him to be struck in the back of the head with a steel chair. I've had that happen to me a few times before, and it's not particularly pleasant.
I just find the image of someone ranting for a long time and then being suddenly struck in the back of the head with a chair to be kind of hilarious.
As someone said, yeah, it's more or a less a wrestling thing.
Looks like it. His art site and this Youtube review credit the same name: Michael L King.
And he used to post written movie reviews in SF&F quite a bit. Now he's branched out -- good for him.
Similar threads
