Oh, and Seina Miller and Rachel Nichols are way hotter then Megan Fox. Yeah I said it.
That I'll give without a doubt. Also after thinking about I'm prepared to give G.I. Joe the slight edge since there's not any huge stuff I actually would have changed about it, whereas I admit that Transformers 2 would have been a better movie if they'd cut the twins and the roommate.
I did! It's filmed a bit too close and stuff keeps flying around the screen. I still enjoyed it, but that would have been my main change to G.I. Joe: just pull the camera back a little. They did that in Transformers 2 compared to the first and it helps the action a lot.
No.
I haven't seen either movie, but if I enjoy it and you don't I don't need to explain anything.
Jeez, you act like I insulted your mother or something. If you haven't seen the movies and don't feel like discussing them (because that's what this is, a discussion, not the Spanish inquisition) why even bother posting in the thread?
G.I Joe was so much fun. I mean preposterous loud, with great FX mixed with attrocious ones, but it was a tight movie that left me grinning, and all the humor fit the film. Sure small bits like the romantic relationships between adults, werent meant for kids, but I'd let a kid watch it. I'd let a kid watch the first Transformers, despite the inclusion of a few lines that might not be appropriate.. the story would be engrossing enough for a kid to look past it. But with TF2 these "humour moments" hurt the flow of the film and took you right out of it. And the ending was a pointless and protracted chase. What bugged me so much was that all the characters from the first film acted so out of character, especially Megatron
Okay maybe this is a cultural thing but...there's much more graphic violence in G.I. Joe then in the first Transformers movie. I'd have doubts about showing it to a kid while Transformers is a much easier decision since it's less graphic.