• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Finally saw Hellboy II (spoilers)

coolghoul

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Searched for a recent thread about Hellboy II but couldn't find one that I could reuse (there's a funny one (in retrospect) predicting Hellboy owning Iron Man in box office returns or quality) - so I am starting a new thread.

I got the DVD the other night out of those extremely convenient redbox kiosks. I had liked Hellboy (the first movie) quite a bit. The whole idea of how Satan has sent Hellboy over but he chooses to side with the good guys, the whimsical otherworldly beings, the "father" bit, the girlfriend 'on fire' bit. In short, I can say that I'm a fan of the first movie.

Then I saw the trailers for Hellboy II and loved the concept. Plug: Tad Williams' Shadowmarch series of books has a similar concept of how the Faerie folk have gradually been disenfranchised by humans and now start moving against the humans is a wonderfully evocative, dreamy, eerie, long, well-written series (third part coming out early next year). One of the things that captures my imagination about the Elves/Fairy in related books is that these magical/wonderful beings' star is on the wane due to the rise and eventual conquest of all things by Man. It is the inherent noble tragedy aspect of it that I like. And the trailer had that, special effects, heart aplenty.

I also loved Guillermo Del Toro's Pan's Labyrinth. Eerie, grand, fanciful and somewhat enigmatic. Did placing the root below the pregnant step-mother help in any way? we never know...

However, I am disappointed by the Hellboy II movie. It just had no heart in it. One never quite sides with Nuada and what's the point of having the Elvish Prince fight back against Man if some part of you doesn't side with him. We don't like him (of course) when he commits patricide, when he tries to kill his sister (how would that have worked out? wouldn't it have killed him too?) or even his relationship with the care-taker. Even when Hellboy has killed the caretaker with whom he must've spent several hundred (thousands?) of years, we never really feel his pain. They did make him a bad-ass (the initial knife-lance practice session reminded me vaguely of Ray Park and his SW: The Phantom Menace skills), looks gorgeously alien, wears the requisite exquisite raiment of an Elvish Prince and yet never captured the tragedy of a person fighting against his people's doom. Even when he is asking Hellboy to join him and stop fighting for the humans, I didn't get a sense of how he should be able to understand Hellboy's isolation/rejection from the humans and see how Hellboy is affected by the continuous rejection based on his looks.

I had no idea why they did the Liz is pregnant routine either. There's never the emotional payoff that I expect from those initial scenes with her and Abe. Hellboy isn't likeable either. Most of the times, he's a jerk to people. (I haven't read the comics so don't know if that is the real personality for Hellboy). They setup the whole Abe really digs Nuala but again there's no real payoff to that. I failed to get the point of introducing the new "smoke" captain of the team either. Is Hellboy supposed to learn a lesson? Is he a great leader or a poor leader or what? Is all he's meant for is to support Hellboy at the finale when Hellboy chooses to flout the orders from his superiors, by being ok about it?!

The whole Angel of Death thing - what was that about?

I was even left cold by the Troll Alley (below Brooklyn bridge) sequence which everybody praises. Sure it has lots of odd artistic touches but imo I would still cite the Pale Man sequence from Pan's Labyrinth's for del Toro fans as being more bizarre/affecting and unique).

The one thing that somehow appealed to me was the death of the Forest God (it's never quite explained what a Forest God is) and how it turns everything into green plants - the road, the car, the building. It is the only thing that really evokes the sense of what the world is losing in the death of these unique creatures.

The worst part of it for me is this - Guillermo del Toro is a good director (unless Pan's Labyrinth was a fluke) and the overall plot had everything going for it - but he wasn't able to turn that into a movie that had a heart. It seems far too much by-the-numbers kinda directing and presentation.

Is it that the studio messed with his cut? Cos now I'm worried about the Hobbit. If he ends up making The Hobbit with zero charm but laden with special effects and cold characters, it just won't do.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was a moderately entertaining but flawed film, though I didn't have as many problems with it as you did. Ironically, one of my biggest problems was with the part you liked best, the Forest God sequence. It was just so weird in its tone. This is the last of its kind, and Hellboy kills it, and it creates a wealth of new life, and it's played as something lush and beautiful and wondrous. So, what, are we supposed to be sad or happy?
 
Well...it's an ambiguous moment. I thought it was supposed to create a moment of emotional confusion. Honestly, I loved the humor in this one, especially the charitable use of "Can't Smile Without You." I hope we get another film in the series with this cast/crew.
 
I thought it was a moderately entertaining but flawed film, though I didn't have as many problems with it as you did. Ironically, one of my biggest problems was with the part you liked best, the Forest God sequence. It was just so weird in its tone. This is the last of its kind, and Hellboy kills it, and it creates a wealth of new life, and it's played as something lush and beautiful and wondrous. So, what, are we supposed to be sad or happy?

I assumed he was trying to provoke both.
 
I thought it was an improvement over the first movie, but neither one really blew me away frankly.

I loved the Hellboy character, but the stories themselves were just a huge bore. They're the same tired, generic superhero plots as we always get, only dressed up with lots of fantastic imagery and with lots of weird creatures walking around everywhere. Don't really see the big deal about it.
 
I thought it was a moderately entertaining but flawed film, though I didn't have as many problems with it as you did. Ironically, one of my biggest problems was with the part you liked best, the Forest God sequence. It was just so weird in its tone. This is the last of its kind, and Hellboy kills it, and it creates a wealth of new life, and it's played as something lush and beautiful and wondrous. So, what, are we supposed to be sad or happy?

I think they kinda explain that the "Forest God" has no choice in the matter. He has to follow Nuada's directive to kill Hellboy. And since Hellboy can't "reason" with it, he has no choice but to kill it - However this isn't really clear in the movie. The whole fight sequence is played for "generic big bad sfx fight sequence in middle of New York". It's only the ending where you are slightly disquieted by it all - The "death" (or destruction) of the big bad Forest God turns everything green - makes everything live. That isn't supposed to happen when 'good conquers bad' - such kinda things only happen when somebody good dies - (eg. in Tolkien, no grass will ever grow on the mounds of the Nazgul). *That* should have been explored more.
 
I think the story was good enough.. Prince Nuadha could have been better but then he was good enough and a good action villain (why is it that most of the time the action villains are regarded as weak whereas the scheming villains are good?).

What i absolutely love is the visual design of the movie.. if you've ever played any fantasy RPG, videogame or read some fantasy literature it feels like one of them.
The Troll Market was gorgeous, the Angel of Death too and the Forest God was amazing (and made me really sad when such a noble creature had to die only to give life back to world :().

In short.. i'm a big fan of Hellboy 2 and likewise Hellboy 1. I have the utmost faith in Del Toro to deliver a near perfect Hobbit and look forward to all of his projects.
 
I thought it was a moderately entertaining but flawed film, though I didn't have as many problems with it as you did. Ironically, one of my biggest problems was with the part you liked best, the Forest God sequence. It was just so weird in its tone. This is the last of its kind, and Hellboy kills it, and it creates a wealth of new life, and it's played as something lush and beautiful and wondrous. So, what, are we supposed to be sad or happy?

I think they kinda explain that the "Forest God" has no choice in the matter. He has to follow Nuada's directive to kill Hellboy. And since Hellboy can't "reason" with it, he has no choice but to kill it - However this isn't really clear in the movie. The whole fight sequence is played for "generic big bad sfx fight sequence in middle of New York". It's only the ending where you are slightly disquieted by it all - The "death" (or destruction) of the big bad Forest God turns everything green - makes everything live. That isn't supposed to happen when 'good conquers bad' - such kinda things only happen when somebody good dies - (eg. in Tolkien, no grass will ever grow on the mounds of the Nazgul). *That* should have been explored more.


it's actualy foreshadowing, Hellboy WILL one day destroy/rule the earth, but he will do it out of love and good intentions
 
I liked the first, but the second was better, of course it had it's flaws but for its budget it had creativity that a lot of big budget blockbusters lack.
 
I thought it was an improvement over the first movie, but neither one really blew me away frankly.

I loved the Hellboy character, but the stories themselves were just a huge bore. They're the same tired, generic superhero plots as we always get, only dressed up with lots of fantastic imagery and with lots of weird creatures walking around everywhere. Don't really see the big deal about it.
This pretty much sums it up for me... it's only the really fun performances by Ron Perlman, Doug Jones, and Jeffrey Tambor that make repeat viewings worthwhile.

And that's easily the best use of a Barry Manilow song ever.
 
I really liked Hellboy 2 and thought it was much better than the first one. Hellboy is one of my favorite comics. There's so many beautiful action scenes in it. I loved the Forest God scene. And the locker room sequence was ****ing hilarious! The only complaint I had (aside from bringing back Selma Blair, ugh) was that the ending of the movie feels too isolated. The Prince is supposed to be leading a revolution but we only ever see Mr.Wink and some fairies helping him. What about the rest of his species? We see a whole crowd of them when he kills daddy then they disappear from the movie. What's going on with them? Did they side with him? Did they just run away?
 
I think the story was good enough.. Prince Nuadha could have been better but then he was good enough and a good action villain (why is it that most of the time the action villains are regarded as weak whereas the scheming villains are good?).

What i absolutely love is the visual design of the movie.. if you've ever played any fantasy RPG, videogame or read some fantasy literature it feels like one of them.
The Troll Market was gorgeous, the Angel of Death too and the Forest God was amazing (and made me really sad when such a noble creature had to die only to give life back to world :().

In short.. i'm a big fan of Hellboy 2 and likewise Hellboy 1. I have the utmost faith in Del Toro to deliver a near perfect Hobbit and look forward to all of his projects.

But is Nuada really a villain?
I guess from the human standpoint, he is.
But all he is actually doing it trying to stop the humans to destroy the world any further.
In Nuada's view humankind is driving all the magic and all the beauty out of the world; destroying the balance between the magical and the 'real' realms of existence.

He's actually the one who is in this fight for unselfish reasons...
 
But is Nuada really a villain?
I guess from the human standpoint, he is.
But all he is actually doing it trying to stop the humans to destroy the world any further.
In Nuada's view humankind is driving all the magic and all the beauty out of the world; destroying the balance between the magical and the 'real' realms of existence.

He's actually the one who is in this fight for unselfish reasons...

Yet he kills his own father, several of his kind (the Kings Guard) and "enslaves" a unique creature to his will to accomplish his goals.

His goal may have merit but his methods and fanaticism clearly put him in the villain category (the cool villain category.. i love his fighting style and his magical spear :drool:).
 
But is Nuada really a villain?
I guess from the human standpoint, he is.
But all he is actually doing it trying to stop the humans to destroy the world any further.
In Nuada's view humankind is driving all the magic and all the beauty out of the world; destroying the balance between the magical and the 'real' realms of existence.

He's actually the one who is in this fight for unselfish reasons...

Yet he kills his own father, several of his kind (the Kings Guard) and "enslaves" a unique creature to his will to accomplish his goals.

His goal may have merit but his methods and fanaticism clearly put him in the villain category (the cool villain category.. i love his fighting style and his magical spear :drool:).

Yeah, you are right. He's a fanatic and his fate illustrates that his way was the wrong way.

And, yes, his style was very cool, and he looked gorgeous...
But as for his magical spear... well, he never took off his pants, so... oh, you mean that spear... never mind ;) :D
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top