The Swine flu vaccine's dirty little secret exposed

[All Seeing Eye]

"The evidence is all over the internet"? So you don't actually have any evidence?

My evidence is the internet. Now go study my evidence in detail.

Well, I'm convinced!

Have you even bothered to go research? didn't think so.

This is always the case, instead of expecting the information to be given to you why don't you actually go and do the research? you have been given an opportunity to go find out the truth for yourself about vaccines and instead you don't. Typical.

 

[Robert Maxwell]

My evidence is the internet. Now go study my evidence in detail.

Well, I'm convinced!

Have you even bothered to go research? didn't think so.

This is always the case, instead of expecting the information to be given to you why don't you actually go and do the research? you have been given an opportunity to go find out the truth for yourself about vaccines and instead you don't. Typical.

Hey, I can make assumptions about people, too!

Considering the number of threads in which you've had to be educated on concepts covered in secondary school, such as magnetism, I'm inclined to think you will believe anything if it's pronounced with enough doom and gloom, and aren't actually swayed by scientific evidence.

I have investigated claims like yours before and found them quite lacking without peer-reviewed corroboration. That is, except for the really insane ones nobody could prove or disprove in the first place, such as "the New World Order wants to make everyone stupid."

 

[All Seeing Eye]

In other words what you are saying is if the media doesn't tell you what to believe you wont believe it. Yes, because the media can be trusted.
What you are saying is, if only one scientist stands up and says something and the majority of other scientists disagree then that scientist is wrong? so in your world the majority rules even when the majority don't have the truth.

Look, don't believe it, believe it, I don't care. If you don't wanna know the truth about vaccines thats your decision.

 

[darkwing_duck1]

Back to flu vaccines...it IS true that there were problems with the 76 (?) vaccine that was rushed into production without the usual tests, etc.

It is also probably true that it is a good idea NOT to inject chemicals like mercury into small children and infants.

But to make a blanket condemnation of vaccines is reckless and dangerous.

Would you rather still have to face random outbreaks of diptheria and polio than vaccinate?

 

[DiSiLLUSiON]

"The evidence is all over the internet"? So you don't actually have any evidence?

My evidence is the internet. Now go study my evidence in detail.

According to the internet:

Belgium does not exist,
The flying spaghetti monster is real, and that
Reptilians are real and are among us.

More then half the internet is filled with complete and utter bull. That's why "the internet" as a generic term can never be used as evidence for anything, much less the things you claim.

What you are saying is, if only one scientist stands up and says something and the majority of other scientists disagree then that scientist is wrong? so in your world the majority rules even when the majority don't have the truth.

It's not about standing up and supporting peers. It's about scientific fact, based on experimentation, using proven methods. If one scientists claims something that all others disprove, then yes, he is in the wrong, until proven otherwise. And rightfully so.

 

[All Seeing Eye]

According to the internet:

Belgium does not exist,
The flying spaghetti monster is real, and that
Reptilians are real and are among us.

More then half the internet is filled with complete and utter bull. That's why "the internet" as a generic term can never be used as evidence for anything, much less the things you claim.

Are you really that incapable of working out what is bull and what isn't? go do proper research, you spend your time searching out idiotic stuff on spaghetti monsters and a country that doesn't exist when it does but yet you wont take the time to actually research about vaccines?

That's just crazy! you are placing your time and energy in the wrong thing. Why put effort into doing things like that which serves no purpose and you get nothing out of it? you don't learn nothing by expelling your energy in such areas.
Go research the truth.

 

[DiSiLLUSiON]

Are you really that incapable of working out what is bull and what isn't? go do proper research, you spend your time searching out idiotic stuff on spaghetti monsters and a country that doesn't exist when it does but yet you wont take the time to actually research about vaccines?

That's just crazy! you are placing your time and energy in the wrong thing. Why put effort into doing things like that which serves no purpose and you get nothing out of it? you don't learn nothing by expelling your energy in such areas.
Go research the truth.

I'm not the one making these outrageous claims that go against anything that's accepted as truth -- you are. As such, it is up to you to research your facts and come up with solid proof for your claims. I highly doubt you have any; but please, by all means prove me wrong.

 

[All Seeing Eye]

I'm not the one making these outrageous claims that go against anything that's accepted as truth --

good grief have you heard yourself. Here we go again, you are willing to agree with the majority simply because there are more of them.

If from birth you had been taught that 2 + 2 = 5 and everyone believed this also does it make it the truth??

It doesn't matter if you and everyone else believe 2 + 2 = 5 because the truth is still the truth and the truth is it equals 4.

 

[DiSiLLUSiON]

Go back and re-read the thread. It's not about the majority, I have told you this before. I still see no proof of your claims. Can I safely assume you don't have any?

 

[All Seeing Eye]

I don't need to re-read the thread. My opinion has been made clear, believe or don't, whatever. Regardless of whether toxic chemicals are put in them, the Human immune system does not need vaccines.

 

[DiSiLLUSiON]

Your opinion has been made clear, yes. But it's still your opinion, not scientific fact. Do not presume to present it as such.

 

[All Seeing Eye]

Your opinion has been made clear, yes. But it's still your opinion, not scientific fact. Do not presume to present it as such.

It is scientific fact, because there have been scientists who have said the same. You believe the scientists you want to believe and i'll believe the scientists I want to believe.

 

[Arrqh]

Your opinion has been made clear, yes. But it's still your opinion, not scientific fact. Do not presume to present it as such.

It is scientific fact, because there have been scientists who have said the same. You believe the scientists you want to believe and i'll believe the scientists I want to believe.

That's not how science works.

Believe whatever you want. But this is the science and technology forum, so don't expect people to just accept what you say unquestioned. If you can't provide a scientific basis for what you are saying... which thus far you have not... then people are going to call you on it.

 

[All Seeing Eye]

Your opinion has been made clear, yes. But it's still your opinion, not scientific fact. Do not presume to present it as such.

It is scientific fact, because there have been scientists who have said the same. You believe the scientists you want to believe and i'll believe the scientists I want to believe.

That's not how science works.

Believe whatever you want. But this is the science and technology forum, so don't expect people to just accept what you say unquestioned. If you can't provide a scientific basis for what you are saying... which thus far you have not... then people are going to call you on it.

and i'm calling YOU on YOUR view. Prove me wrong. You can't? thought not.

Good day.

 

[Arrqh]

It is scientific fact, because there have been scientists who have said the same. You believe the scientists you want to believe and i'll believe the scientists I want to believe.

That's not how science works.

Believe whatever you want. But this is the science and technology forum, so don't expect people to just accept what you say unquestioned. If you can't provide a scientific basis for what you are saying... which thus far you have not... then people are going to call you on it.

and i'm calling YOU on YOUR view. Prove me wrong. You can't? thought not.

Good day.

Again... that's not how science works. You have made an assertion and you have failed to back it up. Any time you'd like to do so... well go ahead! I'm sure we'd all be interested in reading any evidence you have to present.

 

[All Seeing Eye]

You've come in here and you've restarted a conversation that's past finished and gone. I ain't going around in circles again.

 

[Arrqh]

You've come in here and you've restarted a conversation that's past finished and gone. I ain't going around in circles again.

Then... why are you still here if you have no intention of discussing the topic of this thread? Why are you even in this subforum if you aren't interested in discussing things in a scientific fashion?

 

[All Seeing Eye]

because your posts are aimed at me, i'm not going to ignore posts aimed directly at me.
Please do not aim any further posts at me, it's done and dusted. My opinion on the matter is made, accept it or don't accept it. Simple as that.

Good day.

 

[Arrqh]

because your posts are aimed at me, i'm not going to ignore posts aimed directly at me.
Please do not aim any further posts at me, it's done and dusted. My opinion on the matter is made, accept it or don't accept it. Simple as that.

Good day.

Then stop replying?

Once again... as several people have pointed out... you have made claims, in a science subforum, that you have failed to provide any sort of actual evidence for. If that's what you believe, great. But if you can't deal with people asking you to provide evidence for your assertions then that's something you need to figure out how to handle, not the rest of us.

 

[All Seeing Eye]

because your posts are aimed at me, i'm not going to ignore posts aimed directly at me.
Please do not aim any further posts at me, it's done and dusted. My opinion on the matter is made, accept it or don't accept it. Simple as that.

Good day.

Then stop replying?

Once again... as several people have pointed out... you have made claims, in a science subforum, that you have failed to provide any sort of actual evidence for. If that's what you believe, great. But if you can't deal with people asking you to provide evidence for your assertions then that's something you need to figure out how to handle, not the rest of us.

Hello! I have asked YOU to provide ME with evidence also, where is it? i'm waiting.
Prove to me that in todays society that fit healthy eating people need vaccines. Prove to me that they don't put dangerous toxic chemicals into vaccines.

I'm waiting.