I think of the Monk as the Harry Mudd of Doctor Who.
He should never, EVER, be a "serious" threat. More of an amusing and irritating nuisance.
Don't read the New Adventures novel No Future then, whatever you do...
I think of the Monk as the Harry Mudd of Doctor Who.
He should never, EVER, be a "serious" threat. More of an amusing and irritating nuisance.
Ah, that would make sense. Pity Stewart was too busy, but I'm looking forward to Dalton's appearance, Monk or not. Hopefully Stewart will be able to appear later on down the road.From what I'm given to understand by several UK sources, Timothy Dalton is portraying the character that Stewart would have played in the specials. Dalton's schedule was free, while Stewart was booked for Waiting for Godot with Sir Ian McKellan.And just like that, the rumors return to life!I've no doubt that BBC Wales can pony up a lot more money than Big Finish can. If RTD wants to use the Monk, it would happen.
In all seriousness, I would love to see the Monk return, Patrick Stewart or not.
I tend to doubt that character is the Monk.
I think of the Monk as the Harry Mudd of Doctor Who.
He should never, EVER, be a "serious" threat. More of an amusing and irritating nuisance.
Don't read the New Adventures novel No Future then, whatever you do...
The War Chief was destroyed by the Time Lords. I see no way he could have been the Master.
I don't see why this MUST be true. If the Doctor already knew who the Master was, why would he have to specifically mention that he was the War Chief too?If they were the same guy, the Time Lord who warned Doctor #3 about the Master being on Earth would have mentioned it.
Not when he first showed up.The War Chief was destroyed by the Time Lords. I see no way he could have been the Master.
This is clearly evidence in favor of him being The Master. Remember Planet of Fire? Being killed and showing up later is The Master's MO.
Since the War Chief was directly tied to the events resulting in the Doctor's exile on Earth it only makes sense that he or the Doctor would have mentioned the connection at some point.I don't see why this MUST be true. If the Doctor already knew who the Master was, why would he have to specifically mention that he was the War Chief too?If they were the same guy, the Time Lord who warned Doctor #3 about the Master being on Earth would have mentioned it.
The Doctor and the War Chief were never old friends.I think the bloke in the suit called the master "an old friend of yours".
Not when he first showed up.
Davros said:Since the War Chief was directly tied to the events resulting in the Doctor's exile on Earth it only makes sense that he or the Doctor would have mentioned the connection at some point.
Davros said:The Doctor and the War Chief were never old friends.
Not the novelization of War Games, and that is the only one that is canon.Not when he first showed up.
There had to be a first time. Besides, for those who follow the novels, even the novels suggest that the War Chief survived the events of The War Games.
Not the novelization of War Games, and that is the only one that is canon.Not when he first showed up.
There had to be a first time. Besides, for those who follow the novels, even the novels suggest that the War Chief survived the events of The War Games.
I know I don't count any of that faction paradox nonsense. All those books were horrible, as was the idea of Compassion becoming the Tardis.Not the novelization of War Games, and that is the only one that is canon.There had to be a first time. Besides, for those who follow the novels, even the novels suggest that the War Chief survived the events of The War Games.
Novelizations of episodes are not canon either.
But then, don't try to tell Lance Parkin that the books don't count.![]()
Davros said:Since the War Chief was directly tied to the events resulting in the Doctor's exile on Earth it only makes sense that he or the Doctor would have mentioned the connection at some point.
It could also have made sense to mention that the Master was in the academy with the Doctor, but no mention was made of that either.
Lots of Doctor Who characters and concepts aren't owned by the BBC. Copyright works differently in the UK than it does in the US.So, the character isn't owned by the BBC?
When you write a Star Trek story, all the toys from every episode are in the box for you to use, because Paramount owns it all, lock stock and barrel. When you write a Doctor Who story, there are things that are off-limits because the BBC doesn't have free rein to use them.
From what I'm given to understand by several UK sources, Timothy Dalton is portraying the character that Stewart would have played in the specials. Dalton's schedule was free, while Stewart was booked for Waiting for Godot with Sir Ian McKellan.And just like that, the rumors return to life!I've no doubt that BBC Wales can pony up a lot more money than Big Finish can. If RTD wants to use the Monk, it would happen.
In all seriousness, I would love to see the Monk return, Patrick Stewart or not.
I tend to doubt that character is the Monk.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.