• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really work

Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

Your comparison between two people mating to create an offspring and the case of Tuvix are completely different.

Two people mate to create an individual that will carry on their genetic material, Tuvix was created by a Transporter Malfunction that took the matter and bio-patterns and fused them together.

You are neglecting to take into account the orchid, which mates by symbiogenisis. Which is how Tuvix was created.

Had the procedure to seperate the two original individuals not been a relatively straight forward procedure, then we could argue that Tuvix had a right to live.

It wasn't a straightforward procedure. It took many weeks of research, during which time Tuvix was treated like the sentient being and member of the crew he was.

By any ethical standards--even those we employ in medicine today--the Doctor was absolutely right and Janeway absolutely wrong.

"The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few."

But the rights of the individual are protected under Federation law. No one can be forced to give up his life to save others.

BTW, One was also the result of a transporter malfunction. Should he have been executed as well?
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

Of course, if souls don't actually exist, this entire point is moot.

You beat me to it.

All you soul people - you think the soul sort of "lives in" the body? And it needs a body/home until the body "dies" and then (and only then) the soul can go free and doesn't need a body to live in?

Please don't get defensive -- this is a great thread so far -- I'm just trying to get clarification.

Defining the soul, its residence, and its transmission is... complicated. I don't have a very good answer, especially in this context. I don't think the soul just "lives in" the body, but there is an element of that sort of habitation, yes. I wouldn't say the two are independent, or that one precedes the other, though I do believe the soul outlives the body and is the true "person." As a very imperfect analogy, compare it to the Trill. Jadzia Dax did not exist before the joining of Jadzia and Dax. A completely unique entity is created by the two. And Dax outlives Jadzia. Where the analogy breaks down (okay, one of many ways, but I'm trying to be brief) is that the soul (Dax) doesn't exist before the body (Jadzia), and continues on as the single entity (Jadzia Dax) after the body (Jadzia) dies. If there is a new body into which the soul is put, you don't have a new being (Ezri Dax), but the same "person" (Jadzia Dax) in a new body (Ezri, or in the case of a transporter and souls, the reconstuted Jadzia). The difference being that in the case of the transporter, there is no previous being (Ezri Dax) which is being replaced by the soul (Jadzia Dax), but an empty shell (Jadzia). Does that all make sense? :confused:

Back to transporters though, there is no way you can say that Tuvix and Second Chances episode have no implications for transporter use or for the meaning of sentience or consciousness whatsoever.

When Tuvix was created, it is very likely to say that Tuvok and/or Neelix were ALREADY dead! There were alive in Tuvix only in the sense that two parents "live on" in their offspring. That is unless you want to argue that Tuvix was like a Trill and literally had two consciousnesses in one physical body. But the Tuvix episode implied he was a new single individual consciousness formed by combining their DNA (exactly like an offspring of two parents). Again unless Tuvix had multiple consciousness within the same body, Tuvok and/or Neelix (at least one of the two) DIED ALREADY.

So IF Tuvix, was for all intents and purposes, is equivalent to a new offspring, then it reasonable to theorize that:
1) The transporter "mated" Tuvok and Neelix into Tuvix the offspring. But in the process, the "parents" were killed. (unless you want to argue that Tuvix had multiple consciousnesses within him like a Trill)
2) When Tuvok and Neelix were "extracted" from Tuvix, they were simply creating duplicates of Tuvok and Neelix using Tuvix as the source material.

The thing about Tuvix and Second Chances is that consciousnesses are in fact created and destroyed. That is a direct implication! When Tuvix was created at least one consciousness was destroyed. When Tom/Will Riker were both created, at least one new consciousness was created. Based on these two episodes as well as others, it is quite clear that consciousnesses are being created and destroyed because there is no other sensible conclusion.

It would seem that, in the cases of "Tuvix" the transporter can indeed create and destroy consciousness by merging Tuvok and Neelix into one (Tuvix). You're right in that there's no indication that the two consciousness' operate like the Trill do. But this seems to be a freak accident, not at all a regular occurence and not enough to offset what the transporter can do - at least, in my mind. With "Second Chances" it's less I think a creation of consciousness and more a "twinning." Technically, you're right, it is a creation of consciousness, but at the moment of creation it's a duplicate - which later is proved to be his own person by developing differently. Not sure what the theological implications of this are, but since Will was clearly unharmed, I'm inclined to not be bothered by it as far as practicality goes.

Your comparison between two people mating to create an offspring and the case of Tuvix are completely different.

Two people mate to create an individual that will carry on their genetic material, Tuvix was created by a Transporter Malfunction that took the matter and bio-patterns and fused them together.

Are you saying that people only mate to create an offspring on purpose? Are "accidental" creations less valuable than those which are conceived intentionally? :vulcan:

Had the procedure to seperate the two original individuals not been a relatively straight forward procedure, then we could argue that Tuvix had a right to live.

That's a terrible argument - why does difficulty or simplicity of procedure determine right-to-life? It's pretty straight forward to shoot somebody, after all, and life support during comas is expensive.

Tuvix had every right to live - it wasn't his fault that he was created by accident, and what was done to him was execution.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

And what did Tuvok or Neelix do to deserve being trapped in a fused form neither asked for, hm? Janeway would've been just as wrong to leave them "dead" like that, no matter what Tuvix says (of course he'll say anything to keep from being split, he wants to remain alive and in control!).
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

And what did Tuvok or Neelix do to deserve being trapped in a fused form neither asked for, hm? Janeway would've been just as wrong to leave them "dead" like that, no matter what Tuvix says (of course he'll say anything to keep from being split, he wants to remain alive and in control!).

They died in an accident.

Tuvix is a sentient being. He has the right to live. Period.

Today, in transplant medicine, one person can save many through multiple organ donation. Would it be okay to kill someone to use their organs to save 10?
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

If they could be restored, then they were not dead. Dead is if there's no chance of revival.

Tuvix was almost a hostage taker, saying "they live on in me so there's no need to bring them back for real!" to save himself instead of even trying to care that two guys were gone and could be restored.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

If they could be restored, then they were not dead. Dead is if there's no chance of revival.

Then they were dead before the Doctor developed the procedure to separate them.

You're talking as if Tuvix consciously caused the accident that created him, and was therefore culpable.

He didn't. He wasn't.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

If they were dead the Doctor never would have been able to develop a procedure to retrieve them, and Tuvix was openly refusing them the chance to revive two other innocent people who did nothing to deserve what happened to them. He's hardly 100% sympathetic for not considering their plight in the least.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

If they were dead the Doctor never would have been able to develop a procedure to retrieve them, and Tuvix was openly refusing them the chance to revive two other innocent people who did nothing to deserve what happened to them. He's hardly 100% sympathetic for not considering their plight in the least.

He doesn't have to be 100 percent sympathetic. As a sentient individual he still has the right to live.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

And as sentient beings, so do Tuvok and Neelix. There's no definitive answer to this (which was the point).
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

And as sentient beings, so do Tuvok and Neelix. There's no definitive answer to this (which was the point).

Actually, there is.

The Doctor is right. He can't perform the procedure he devised without the patient's consent. And the patient who is here and now is Tuvix.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

If they were dead the Doctor never would have been able to develop a procedure to retrieve them, and Tuvix was openly refusing them the chance to revive two other innocent people who did nothing to deserve what happened to them. He's hardly 100% sympathetic for not considering their plight in the least.

The Doctor's procedure may not have been "retrieving them". Rather it is more likely that the procedure created new DUPLICATES of Tuvok and Neelix, not the original Tuvok and Neelix prior to the transporter accident. The original Tuvok and Neelix were KILLED and remained DEAD regardless of the duplicates that were created using Tuvix as the source material.
 
Last edited:
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

My own take on the "soul" (or cousiousness or sentience, etc) is that it exists only in the mind in its neural activity and connectivity. From the moment when these neural connections were developed to death when the connections collapse, your soul and your very being is alive. But once this connectivity is gone, you are gone.

Now if the transporter could maintain the neural activity and connectivity DURING transport, then a good argument can be made that your "soul" is being transported. However if the transporter does not do such a thing and your neural connectivity is shut off and recreated later than clearly your soul was not recreated. Rather it is a duplicate being that was created.

Now why can't your soul be recreated? Well suppose it were possible to scan you and recreate a duplicate of you so that simultaneously there is a duplicate on the other side of transport. That duplicate clearly has its own soul that is different from yours because your soul is still in continous existence. Now let's say at this point I kill the original you. Now does the "soul" of the original you migrate to the body of the duplicate you? Obviously not because the duplicate of you already had its own soul indepedent of yours and would keep its soul going until the death of the duplicate.

This thought experiment proves that the duplicate has its own soul and it is not your original soul. Because if the transporter can clearly create new souls, then there is zero basis to believe that it isn't creating new souls all the time.

The Tuvix and Second Chances episode clearly show that the soul or consciousness is not kept in continous existence. And that being the case, the transporter clearly kills people in its normal course of operation (but also creates brand new consciousness as well).
 
Last edited:
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

Teya, you are right, in our Western tradition of natural rights, Tuvix has the right to stay alive. It was unfortunate what happened to Tuvok and Neelix. But once Tuvix is alive, he wins. Or should.

Polyharmonic, you equate "soul" with a person's unique consciousness. I think many soul-believers would posit "soul" as something a bit more mystical, but whatever. By your definition, if the transporter creates new consciousnesses, then it is actually creating souls, eh? Interesting.

Thanks to all in this thread, the best so far in my experience on this BBS dealing with an ethical, potentially devisive issue. Peace and well being to all, even if you are a transporter clone!
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

BTW this episode creates a dilemma for me, eliminating my favorite and least favorite characters on Voyager. I leave which is which as an eternal mystery.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

And as sentient beings, so do Tuvok and Neelix. There's no definitive answer to this (which was the point).

Actually, there is.

The Doctor is right. He can't perform the procedure he devised without the patient's consent. And the patient who is here and now is Tuvix.

And there are the other two patients who are there but can't be heard thanks to the 3rd one interfering. Leaving that decision up to the Captain who is responsible for said other two crewmembers making it HER decision by default. Janeway just did her duty. (Here, someone will make a Nazi reference)
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

So, if you were pregnant with fraternal twins and had a life-threatening condition which could only be cured by killing the twins, should we-

a) "Needs of the many outweigh needs of the few" - kill you to save the twins?
b) "Focus on what is, not what might be" - kill the twins to save you?
c) "Pro-choice" - Abide by your decision in the matter?

Note that killing you doesn't _guarantee_ the twins' survival.

Another point of episode-related contention- do you feel your decision should be imposed upon others in the same situation?
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

So, if you were pregnant with fraternal twins and had a life-threatening condition which could only be cured by killing the twins, should we-

a) "Needs of the many outweigh needs of the few" - kill you to save the twins?
b) "Focus on what is, not what might be" - kill the twins to save you?
c) "Pro-choice" - Abide by your decision in the matter?

If I were carrying the twins I'd like to believe I would be willing to give my life to save them. Granted you can't know how you would react in that type of situation until you actually face it but that's what I believe I would do.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

Do you think your choice should be imposed upon another?

Just carrying the Tuvix analogy a step further...will edit my original post to reflect that, actually.

I really don't know what I'd do, especially when you throw in the fact that opting to kill myself might just result in three deaths instead of two.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

Do you think your choice should be imposed upon another?

Just carrying the Tuvix analogy a step further...will edit my original post to reflect that, actually.

I really don't know what I'd do, especially when you throw in the fact that opting to kill myself might just result in three deaths instead of two.

The problem with this analogy is there is the father of the twins to consider too. Also, as you well know a fetus does not have the full rights that an adult does. Personally, I believe that saving the twins would be the right thing to do but no I would not force someone to make that same call...

...unless I was the captain of a starship and the "twins" were two members of my crew who were altered in a transporter accident. I'm not saying the choice Janeway made was easy or didn't have its moral implications but I see why she made it.
 
Re: Tuvix and its disturbing implications for how transports really wo

Easy fix - the father passed away sometime between conception and the present. Morbid, but it solves the problem. :)

I think whether or not a fetus _should_ have the same rights is debatable. Should "dead" Neelix and Tuvok have had the same rights as living Tuvix? While his objectivity is obviously questionable, it could be argued that he was best qualified to speak for them. I believe he claimed in the episode that Tuvok and Neelix wouldn't have approved of Janeway's decision (I haven't seen it in too long).

With your last paragraph, it sounds like the "correct" answer should be dependent on who the people were. I find that a troubling guideline.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top