You mentioned "for the audience, and the fanboys". So it's not just your personal preference we're talking about. So, why isn't "ENTERPRISE" or "VOYAGER" or "CONSTELLATION" cue enough?
Why not?
Personal preference.
You mentioned "for the audience, and the fanboys". So it's not just your personal preference we're talking about. So, why isn't "ENTERPRISE" or "VOYAGER" or "CONSTELLATION" cue enough?
Why not?
Personal preference.
You mentioned "for the audience, and the fanboys". So it's not just your personal preference we're talking about. So, why isn't "ENTERPRISE" or "VOYAGER" or "CONSTELLATION" cue enough?Why not?
Personal preference.
Not the only one, no.You mentioned "for the audience, and the fanboys". So it's not just your personal preference we're talking about. So, why isn't "ENTERPRISE" or "VOYAGER" or "CONSTELLATION" cue enough?Personal preference.
I'm not a fanboy?
Not the only one, no.You mentioned "for the audience, and the fanboys". So it's not just your personal preference we're talking about. So, why isn't "ENTERPRISE" or "VOYAGER" or "CONSTELLATION" cue enough?
I'm not a fanboy?
I asked you a simple question, out of genuine curiosity, and all you could come up with was 'No'. That's not what discussion boards are for, you know. Now I'm done fishing.Not the only one, no.I'm not a fanboy?
Ok. Can you just accept that it's MY opinion and leave it at that, and recognize that maybe, JUST maybe, there's one or two other people who agree with me?
I asked you a simple question, out of genuine curiosity, and all you could come up with was 'No'. That's not what discussion boards are for, you know. Now I'm done fishing.Not the only one, no.
Ok. Can you just accept that it's MY opinion and leave it at that, and recognize that maybe, JUST maybe, there's one or two other people who agree with me?![]()
I asked you a simple question, out of genuine curiosity, and all you could come up with was 'No'. That's not what discussion boards are for, you know. Now I'm done fishing.Ok. Can you just accept that it's MY opinion and leave it at that, and recognize that maybe, JUST maybe, there's one or two other people who agree with me?![]()
Sorry, I didn't have a whole lot to add to the discussion.![]()
Though not seen onscreen, we do have the comm chatter outside Epsilon 9 mentioning the scouts Revere NCC-595 and Columbia NCC-621 as well as the dreadnought Entente NCC-2120 from TMP. One would have to decide for one's self how much weight to give them and what they imply about the TMP-era fleet and registries, but they are another data point.Praetor,
I'm not sure I'd want to include all of FJ's ship classes, as I don't like many of his designs (though I do like the Federation-class Dreadnought)I like this. A lot. I'm not sure if it's totally workable, and I still hate the idea of "Naval Construction Contract" a little, but I do like the scheme. I suppose a good question would also be whether to include FJ's ship classes?
Well, that's the benefit of them being non-canon, I suppose. Myself, I'd include at least a version of each of them. We could fudge the numbers, potentially.
So, in summary, we know the following:
Any corrections/additions to this?
- MJ made up the number "NCC-1701" because it looked good, and later rationalized that 17 meant first series, 01 first model.
- Constellation had "NCC-1017" as a decal rearrangement that would theoretically make it stand out.
- Besides establishing a list names for other Starships, the TOS production did not establish a list of registries.
- "Court Martial" offered us a list of ship registries that we don't know to correspond with everything.
- FJ came up with his own scheme that seemed somewhat based on MJ's.
- The next registry number we saw was NCC-1864 for Reliant in TWOK, followed by NCC-638 and NX-2000 in TSFS, and then the Saratoga in TVH.
- The TNG production purposefully ignored/refuted the FJ scheme, which, having been based on the MJ scheme, kind of kills that.
It is funny, I've used this image a number of times in the last year and a half and you're the first person to notice that I changed the name.Is my eyesight failing me or is that top ship not Matt Decker's ship at all? I read Constantinople. Was that change intentional?
Was it ever explicitly said the Republic was a Constitution Class?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.