• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Were we what was wrong with the movie?

No. He put in familiar references. He did not recapture any of the flavour of the original. He threw away any semblance of substance and nuance in favour of mindless caracitures and cliches.

Gotta agree with this. I didn't loathe the film the way you did, Warped, but this is definitely a point I agree with.
 
They bitched about TMP
They bitched about TWOK
They bitched about TSFS
They bitched about TVH
They bitched about TFF
They bitched about TUC
They bitched about TNG
They bitched about GEN
They bitched about FC
They bitched about INS
They bitched about NEM
They bitched about DS9
They bitched about VOY
They bitched about ENT
And (surprise!) they bitched about this new film.

You forgot TAS. Many purist TOS fans detested the idea of Saturday morning Star Trek, despite the fact that it created many new ST fans (me included), who went on to discover TMP and TOS.

And you forgot the CGI-enhanced remastered TOS, in both syndication and on DVD/HD/Blu-Ray. Many purist ST fans detested the idea of that, too.
 
This film will not age well. Familiarity with it over time will breed widening contempt. Guaranteed.
... It's a stain in the shadow of when Star Trek has been done far better and not just in TOS.

You know, when I entered ST fandom, as a wide-eyed newbie in 1980, I was constantly told exactly the same things about my (still) favourite movie of all time: "Star Trek: The Motion Picture". And, surprise, surprise, over the last ten or so years that movie has actually grown on people, so that it's no longer detested and ridiculed the way it used to be.

My second favourite movie of all time is probably... JJ's "Star Trek".
 
I didn't realize there was much backlash from TAS.

But TOS-R....
Hoo-boy.

Purists pissed and moaned till the cows came home, despite an enthusiastic endorsement from Bob Justman.... You know, the guy who was as involved with TOS as the Great Bird himself. It didn't matter. The purists are living in their own Private Idaho.

I can't possibly take any of that seriously. Their warp drive is definitely offline.
 
Of course yoiu don't.

I'm being wished good luck for saying 'Trek Lite'?

Trek Lite... Trek Lite... Trek Lite.

Success!

Thanks for your support, guys. Usually, you two devote most of your time belittling those who don't like the movie with sarcasm and non-productive posts. Glad to see a turnaround!

/sarcasm
 
I didn't realize there was much backlash from TAS.

But TOS-R....
Hoo-boy.

Purists pissed and moaned till the cows came home, despite an enthusiastic endorsement from Bob Justman.... You know, the guy who was as involved with TOS as the Great Bird himself. It didn't matter. The purists are living in their own Private Idaho.

I can't possibly take any of that seriously. Their warp drive is definitely offline.

And lets not NOW forget that Herb Solow loved the movie too...
 
Does it really matter who loved the movie and who didn't? Isn't your enjoyment of a movie idiosyncratic to your own expectations?
 
Does it really matter who loved the movie and who didn't? Isn't your enjoyment of a movie idiosyncratic to your own expectations?

Pretty much.

"I don't like it" does not mean the exact same thing as "it's not good," much as some folks like to confuse the two.
 
Does it really matter who loved the movie and who didn't? Isn't your enjoyment of a movie idiosyncratic to your own expectations?

Pretty much.

"I don't like it" does not mean the exact same thing as "it's not good," much as some folks like to confuse the two.
Although it could very well mean the same thing, too, Dennis. And besides, I thought most posters around here maintain that the fans' opinions are irrelevant regardless.

That said, I enjoyed the film -- perhaps not as much as if it had been a "true" prequel, but it maintained the basic spirit of Star Trek without doing too much to assault my love of TOS. It could have been a smarter story, and it could just as easily been set in a world that aesthetically more closely matched TOS and told virtually the same tale. (I'm still not sure how a 20th century brewery is somehow a more convincing view of the future than anything presented in TOS.) All the Trek films since TWOK have needed an infusion of excitement moreso than reimagining, and that no doubt is this film's greatest strength.
 
Does it really matter who loved the movie and who didn't? Isn't your enjoyment of a movie idiosyncratic to your own expectations?

Pretty much.

"I don't like it" does not mean the exact same thing as "it's not good," much as some folks like to confuse the two.
Although it could very well mean the same thing, too, Dennis.

That is certainly often the intention of the speaker. Generally, however, it's only the former meaning that really has any authority; after all, as you also point out the success of this kind of film is not determined by the relatively few who are really strongly invested in it. Most people who've seen the film, including the majority of professional reviewers, clearly do think it's a good film (they like it). There's no evidence that the hard-core fans who insist that it's a bad movie have any appreciation of films that's superior to the public-at-large; they're simply more attached to oldTrek.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top