• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Robocop

I adore RoboCop. I was ten when it came out and I watched it so often on VHS. I have that movie seared into my brain. As much as the sequels do suck, I kind of dig the second one and the third is cool for the jetpack, but nothing else. The series was awesome and I have my tapes of it somewhere back home. I would snap up a DVD release of those in a heart beat. Personally, I love how over the top the film is in terms of violence, but the series really captures the satire of the world. I also kind of liked the comics they put out in the early 90s too.
 
Um, I think everyone agrees it's contemptable in the real world. This is entertainment we're talking about. Do you have this big an issue with EVERY action movie?

As I said, I don't find revenge stories entertaining. Lots of villains are driven by revenge (Nero in the new Star Trek movie, for instance, not to mention Khan). So why should I consider a character out for revenge to be a hero? Why should I care about the story if both sides are equally malevolent, indistinguishable in their methods and motives? That's not heroes vs. villains or good triumphing over evil, just the nihilistic law of the jungle. I'm not entertained by that.


If these movies don't make us hate the bad guys and want to see the good guys kick their ass, then they're probably doing something wrong. lol

I don't want to hate the bad guys, I want to like the good guys. I want it to be a positive experience, not purely a negative one. What I enjoy are stories about people protecting life, not just inflicting death.

The character is called RoboCop. He's a police officer. He's the ultimate police officer. And police officers are supposed to be people who serve and protect. That's what Robo did in the TV series and failed to do in the movie sequels. In the show, he was really a cop. And I liked that.


And as much as Verhoeven embraces violence, I don't think the intent was for the viewer to approve of it. His goal, according to interviews I recall, was to take the violence so far over the top that it went clear past being horrific and became farcical. It wasn't glorifying or celebrating that violence, it was mocking it. We weren't supposed to approve of it, we were meant to recognize how insane and ridiculous it was.
I know the director was satirizing the media, our consumer culture, and corporate greed, but I'm not so sure about the violence. Yeah it was outrageous and over the top, but I think that was used more to show what a crazy and violent place that world had become.

And also because it's just a stylistic thing Verhoeven does with ALL his movies.

Verhoeven is on record as saying that his intent was to satirize ultraviolence by taking it to a ludicrous excess. True, the fact that he does the same in all his movies suggests a certain hypocrisy, but that is what he's on record as saying. It's not my opinion or something I'm making up, it's a documented statement of directorial intent.
 
^Again, speak for yourself. I don't find revenge "interesting." I find it stupid and contemptible. Heroes are people who are better than the villains, not people who act exactly like them. If both sides are equally contemptuous of human life, if both sides think that sating their personal desires (whether greed, anger, retribution, or anything else) justifies killing, then why should I root for one side over the other?

Um, I think everyone agrees it's contemptable in the real world. This is entertainment we're talking about. Do you have this big an issue with EVERY action movie?

If these movies don't make us hate the bad guys and want to see the good guys kick their ass, then they're probably doing something wrong. lol

I will stand by his assessment that that's not what the film was about... Granted, revenge stories have always existed, even in classic mythology. It's a great plot device if used right.

And as much as Verhoeven embraces violence, I don't think the intent was for the viewer to approve of it. His goal, according to interviews I recall, was to take the violence so far over the top that it went clear past being horrific and became farcical. It wasn't glorifying or celebrating that violence, it was mocking it. We weren't supposed to approve of it, we were meant to recognize how insane and ridiculous it was.
I know the director was satirizing the media, our consumer culture, and corporate greed, but I'm not so sure about the violence. Yeah it was outrageous and over the top, but I think that was used more to show what a crazy and violent place that world had become.

And also because it's just a stylistic thing Verhoeven does with ALL his movies.[/QUOTE]


No, he was satirizing our violent culture as well..... Violence is fun in movies. It's exciting, it comical.... But some movies at the time (Most Notably Rambo, First Blood Part II) seemed to embrace blatant violence and milatarism as a way of life. Robocop the Series had a great bit about this, with a short cartoon selling an instant stomach wound... Hit a button, all the guts fly out... I love that bit....

It's the same sort of Satire as "Troma's War" but since it's not from Troma, it's a lot better put together.
 
The character is called RoboCop. He's a police officer. He's the ultimate police officer. And police officers are supposed to be people who serve and protect. That's what Robo did in the TV series and failed to do in the movie sequels. In the show, he was really a cop. And I liked that.

Kind of nice that he never had to do paperwork or appear in court though like a real cop. :techman:
 
The character is called RoboCop. He's a police officer. He's the ultimate police officer. And police officers are supposed to be people who serve and protect. That's what Robo did in the TV series and failed to do in the movie sequels. In the show, he was really a cop. And I liked that.
Kind of nice that he never had to do paperwork or appear in court though like a real cop. :techman:

Just like in most Cop Shows and movies... God, I love that cliche.
 
Actually I think Robo did do paperwork on occasion in the series, but he did it electronically by uploading his reports. I can't recall any scenes of him testifying against a suspect in court, though. The one courtroom scene I can recall was in "Prime Suspect," an early episode based on a comic-book miniseries, in which Robo was framed for a murder and there was a hearing to determine whether he should be deactivated.
 
Well, It's good to know that we all agree that the sequels were shit. I have faith in humanity again. :lol:

As for the series, with all the talk of it, I'm actually interested in finding and watching it. I honestly find it hard to believe that Eden could be as great as Murphy in the role, but who knows?
 
Well, It's good to know that we all agree that the sequels were shit. I have faith in humanity again. :lol:

As for the series, with all the talk of it, I'm actually interested in finding and watching it. I honestly find it hard to believe that Eden could be as great as Murphy in the role, but who knows?

There are plenty of less than legit places to view it online, and pretty high quality too. I've been hoping for a DVD release.

One Episode was released on VHS (not even the Pilot) and a small collection on Laserdisc... In Japan. Much of the series is left wing propaganda (of course, Verhoeven referred to the movie as "Facism for Liberals anyway, so I don't quite understand why the politics would bother a fan of the film), but done in a way where if you don't agree, you still get a good laugh.

Chris Eden is not a match for Weller, but definitely much better Robert Burke. The only complaint I have about Eden is he doesn't have the Chin for that part.......
 
The character is called RoboCop. He's a police officer. He's the ultimate police officer. And police officers are supposed to be people who serve and protect. That's what Robo did in the TV series and failed to do in the movie sequels. In the show, he was really a cop. And I liked that.
Kind of nice that he never had to do paperwork or appear in court though like a real cop. :techman:

Tune in next season when Robocop joins the cast of Law and Order- Criminal Intent
 
Well, It's good to know that we all agree that the sequels were shit. I have faith in humanity again. :lol:

As for the series, with all the talk of it, I'm actually interested in finding and watching it. I honestly find it hard to believe that Eden could be as great as Murphy in the role, but who knows?

There are plenty of less than legit places to view it online, and pretty high quality too. I've been hoping for a DVD release.

One Episode was released on VHS (not even the Pilot) and a small collection on Laserdisc... In Japan. Much of the series is left wing propaganda (of course, Verhoeven referred to the movie as "Facism for Liberals anyway, so I don't quite understand why the politics would bother a fan of the film), but done in a way where if you don't agree, you still get a good laugh.

Chris Eden is not a match for Weller, but definitely much better Robert Burke. The only complaint I have about Eden is he doesn't have the Chin for that part.......

Well Verhoeven and one the film's writers (the one begin with N) are both staunchly left wing so that's a definte influence on the film (was reading the wiki entry tonight while watching the film on Space).

And funnily enough Space showed a version that had some of the things usually cut (Murphy's arm being blown off, the splut of blood when Boddecker gets the point).
 
The character is called RoboCop. He's a police officer. He's the ultimate police officer. And police officers are supposed to be people who serve and protect. That's what Robo did in the TV series and failed to do in the movie sequels. In the show, he was really a cop. And I liked that.

Kind of nice that he never had to do paperwork or appear in court though like a real cop. :techman:

who needs to do paperwork when you can download your video of the event
 
Well, It's good to know that we all agree that the sequels were shit. I have faith in humanity again. :lol:

As for the series, with all the talk of it, I'm actually interested in finding and watching it. I honestly find it hard to believe that Eden could be as great as Murphy in the role, but who knows?

There are plenty of less than legit places to view it online, and pretty high quality too. I've been hoping for a DVD release.

One Episode was released on VHS (not even the Pilot) and a small collection on Laserdisc... In Japan. Much of the series is left wing propaganda (of course, Verhoeven referred to the movie as "Facism for Liberals anyway, so I don't quite understand why the politics would bother a fan of the film), but done in a way where if you don't agree, you still get a good laugh.

Chris Eden is not a match for Weller, but definitely much better Robert Burke. The only complaint I have about Eden is he doesn't have the Chin for that part.......

Well Verhoeven and one the film's writers (the one begin with N) are both staunchly left wing so that's a definte influence on the film (was reading the wiki entry tonight while watching the film on Space).

And funnily enough Space showed a version that had some of the things usually cut (Murphy's arm being blown off, the splut of blood when Boddecker gets the point).


What's great about this movie is, unlike other movies that have a definite point of view, you can just ignore them... Unlike "300" where it's just jammed in your face.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top