nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Earth!

[CommanderRaytas]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

When has this become a discussion about the Bible?

We are talking about inconsistencies in creation myths and the flawed proposition by some that two inconsistent creation myths are, in their view, really consistent. The older myth is, by definition, better and should be the canon one.

Bottom line:

Just like with Star Trek, what is most important in the Bible are the details and canon. Without the canon, it is pointless. The same goes for Star Trek.

Boys, like I said, I'm on your side. I get it. It's still so... dunno.. martial. Somewhat.

Anyway. I think we should all lighten up a bit.

... I feel so chilly right now.

 

[Hartzilla2007]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

When has this become a discussion about the Bible?

We are talking about inconsistencies in creation myths and the flawed proposition by some that two inconsistent creation myths are, in their view, really consistent. The older myth is, by definition, better and should be the canon one.

Bottom line:

Just like with Star Trek, what is most important in the Bible are the details and canon. Without the canon, it is pointless. The same goes for Star Trek.

Boys, like I said, I'm on your side. I get it. It's still so... dunno.. martial. Somewhat.

Anyway. I think we should all lighten up a bit.

... I feel so chilly right now.

No thats just some gas

 

[Gepard]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Wow, this thread just reached "SPOCK SHOULD BE CONSTANTLY SHOUTING" levels of absurdity.

No, that would be when a translation of the Bible comes out that has Adam shouting "THE WOMEN!" and it was so.

"And God said 'LET THERE BE THE WOMEN!' And there was WOMEN! And He called it SHOUTING SPOCK."

-Cogley 17:01.

 

[Hartzilla2007]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Wow, this thread just reached "SPOCK SHOULD BE CONSTANTLY SHOUTING" levels of absurdity.

No, that would be when a translation of the Bible comes out that has Adam shouting "THE WOMEN!" and it was so.

"And God said 'LET THERE BE THE WOMEN!' And there was WOMEN! And He called it SHOUTING SPOCK."

-Cogley 17:01.

 

[Praetor]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Wow, this thread just reached "SPOCK SHOULD BE CONSTANTLY SHOUTING" levels of absurdity.

No, that would be when a translation of the Bible comes out that has Adam shouting "THE WOMEN!" and it was so.

"And God said 'LET THERE BE THE WOMEN!' And there was WOMEN! And He called it SHOUTING SPOCK."

-Cogley 17:01.

That's all kinds of win.

 

[Herkimer Jitty]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Wow, this thread just reached "SPOCK SHOULD BE CONSTANTLY SHOUTING" levels of absurdity.

No, that would be when a translation of the Bible comes out that has Adam shouting "THE WOMEN!" and it was so.

"And God said 'LET THERE BE THE WOMEN!' And there was WOMEN! And He called it SHOUTING SPOCK."

-Cogley 17:01.

We should totally write a Shouting Spock/Blue Warp Nacelles/Captain Robau Bible.

 

[Praetor]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

All power to the engines.

 

[Guartho]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

And the Lord saw the First Pilot and deemed it too cerebral. But the Lord saw that it was good and so He commissioned a Second Pilot. He saw the Second Pilot and saw that it was good and He placed the series into the time slot he had prepared.

 

[Vicki]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Canon has always been what ~aired~ on the screen, large or small. Nothing more, nothing less. No producer/writer interviews, no books, no deleted sceens. STXI and the alternate universe is canon.

/signed ... older than dirt who watched TOS first run

 

[Guartho]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

You really should read the whole thread before posting.

 

[KirkusOveractus]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Wow, this thread just reached "SPOCK SHOULD BE CONSTANTLY SHOUTING" levels of absurdity.

No, that would be when a translation of the Bible comes out that has Adam shouting "THE WOMEN!" and it was so.

"And God said 'LET THERE BE THE WOMEN!' And there was WOMEN! And He called it SHOUTING SPOCK."

-Cogley 17:01.

I further quote Tiberius, 22:33, that says "Waaaaaaaaaaah!" (hey, he was just born, give him time to save the galaxy!)

 

[KirkusOveractus]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Should we further examine this against the backdrop of Nietzsche, in his "Man or Superman", when he actually chose Batman, or his "Will to Riker" as an overall yardstick to place against that which happened at the moment of creation?

 

[Guartho]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Hey, we have to finish writing the thing before we even think about writing a dissertation about it!

 

[Mr. Laser Beam]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

I further quote Tiberius, 22:33, that says "Waaaaaaaaaaah!" (hey, he was just born, give him time to save the galaxy!)

In the beginning was the Robau.
And the word was with Robau, and the word *was* Robau.
And the Narada shined in the darkness, and the Kelvin comprehended it not...

 

[SonicRanger]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Now you three are just getting plain silly. What is this? RobertScorpio's thread on Uhura's underwear?

 

[Hartzilla2007]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Now you three are just getting plain silly. What is this? RobertScorpio's thread on Uhura's underwear?

Silence Nonbeliever of the new.

 

[SonicRanger]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Now you three are just getting plain silly. What is this? RobertScorpio's thread on Uhura's underwear?

Silence Nonbeliever of the new.

Clearly you hate Star Trek and are not a True Fan.

 

[Hartzilla2007]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Now you three are just getting plain silly. What is this? RobertScorpio's thread on Uhura's underwear?

Silence Nonbeliever of the new.

Clearly you hate Star Trek and are not a True Fan.

But, because the new movie shunts the old stuff into an alternate timeline and replaces it THIS IS Star Trek and it is YOU who are not a True Fan because Clearly you hate Star Trek, so there

 

[CommanderRaytas]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

The moral of the story is: don't post when you're drunk. And also: be careful you don't send your pornographic messages to the wrong person.

 

[Middle Earther]

Re: nuTrek destroys Roddenberry’s vision of 23rd-century humans and Ea

Silence Nonbeliever of the new.

Clearly you hate Star Trek and are not a True Fan.

But, because the new movie shunts the old stuff into an alternate timeline and replaces it THIS IS Star Trek and it is YOU who are not a True Fan because Clearly you hate Star Trek, so there

nuFans are part of the alternate timeline which was created when a black man became President. Like that would ever happen in the Prime line.