I do actually, people's lives depend on it.
Well, it's a good thing you're not a member of your profession back in 1970s!
Yes, it would have been very frustrating having all those people die.
Tell you what, only people who need phones to ensure lives won't be lost can have them.
If you're a soccer mom that just wants to gab about little Billy's latest trip to get his shots while going 65 down the left lane of a 75mph interstante: NO CELL-PHONE FOR YOU!
If you're a doctor: You can have a cell-phone.
That or we just start installing much stiffer and harder fines/punishments for driving while distracted (be-it on the phone, shaving, eating, whatever.)
For the record, I don't think we need MORE laws governing cell-phone/texting use while driving. The laws we have are plenty good enough. We just need to actually enforce them and make the penalties stiff enough to greatly deter people from doing it.
I mean, if all you're going to get is a non-moving violation inattentive driving fine for $100 then people aren't going to care.
Make it $500, a moving violation, with mandatory traffic courses then you'll have more of deterant.
A great many people still drink and drive, but we'd have many more people drinking and driving if the penalties for doing it weren't so stiff and harsh.
Exaggeration or not, the simple fact is no matter the punishment, people will keep on texting while driving.
Are you proposing that we've no punishment for any crime at all?
Robbery, murder, and much, much more are all illegal and can carry stiff punishment yet people still do those things.
Brilliant!
Laws don't work.
ANARCHY!!!!