• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XII?

cmdrbolly

Lieutenant
Red Shirt
A few threads here got me thinking - with the revivication of Star Trek successfully well under way ( arguments about that statement will be for another thread) - who would I imagine to be the perfect director to tackle the next installment?

Abrams has clearly polarized the fanbase, and while I think he did an admirable job with the actors/characters, there are surely other departments which could stand some improvement. I think one of his strengths is an ability to quickly and very efficiently sketch a character and within a few scenes, make them likeable. That's got a lot to do with the writer's and actors as well, of course, but ultimately a good director will be the person chiefly shaping the performances and deciding how a scene should work and to what end in the overall film ( This is the caveat I suppose, in that we seldom know who contributed what to each moment - but let's assume, for the sake of this discussion, that the person who gets the credit actually deserves it ).

The nature of the franchise requires not just a person who can handle drama, but also have a light comedic touch. To have an eye for performance and an ear for dialogue. Be able to shepherd (along with the producer) a well-structured and strong script. Have an eye for action set pieces and an ability to block action so that while it feels raw and chaotic, still have it be coherent to the viewer. Have good enough taste to surround himself with quality people in the production design or else be able to get quality work if he's not.

So who would your 'Dream Director' be? It'd be great to hear who, and if possible, why?

nb: naturally, all the standard assumptions will apply - that he/she will have final cut ( along with final say in all other departments pre and post)
 
Last edited:
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

I say bring Abrams back. He hasn't polarized the fanbase. There were those extremely hardcore fans who would never have liked it anyway, then you had those who, for whatever reason, didn't like it. But for the most part, a majority of people have loved this movie. If you ask me (and you haven't), Voyager, DS9 and Enterprise were far more polarizing then Trek 09. I say that because that's where you had various brances of the fanbase break off to follow what they found to be "real Star Trek". BTW, I'm a huge fan of DS9, but that's where it all began.

I say don't worry about trying to appeal to those who didn't like it and don't try to win them back, because you won't succeed without alienating everyone else. Just keep on doing what you're doing, make a good movie with a strong story, plenty of emotion, and a fun ride, and make it entertaining!

Bring Abrams back!
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

I am very happy with Abrams' work in ST'09, so I would like to see him back in the director's chair for the next film.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

A few threads here got me thinking - with the revivication of Star Trek successfully well under way ( arguments about that statement will be for another thread) - who would I imagine to be the perfect director to tackle the next installment?

Abrams has clearly polarized the fanbase, and while I think he did an admirable job with the actors/characters, there are surely other departments which could stand some improvement.

I'm not sure I would consider am 84% to 16% split in favor of the new movie "polarizing."

(Really, I'm trying to avoid comparisons to present day political coverage, but the parallels are running pretty thick. Next thing you know somebody is going to demand to see Abrams' birth certificate.)

Thenature of the franchise requires not just a person who can handle drama, but also have a light comedic touch. To have an eye for performance and an ear for dialogue. Be able to shepherd (along with the producer) a well-structured and strong script. Have an eye for action set pieces and an ability to block action so that while it feels raw and chaotic, still have it be coherent to the viewer. Have good enough taste to surround himself with quality people in the production design or else be able to get quality work if he's not.
Sounds like JJ Abrams.

Also, wouldn't these be the qualities you would want in a director for any big tentpole movie?
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

J.J. Abrams.

He hasn't polarized the fanbase. In fact, it would seem the majority of Trek fans are quite satisfied with the movie, as well as tons of new fans directly resulting from the movie.

J.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

I say let Quinto direct a couple, then let Pine try his hand.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

A few threads here got me thinking - with the revivication of Star Trek successfully well under way ( arguments about that statement will be for another thread) - who would I imagine to be the perfect director to tackle the next installment?

Abrams has clearly polarized the fanbase, and while I think he did an admirable job with the actors/characters, there are surely other departments which could stand some improvement.

I'm not sure I would consider am 84% to 16% split in favor of the new movie "polarizing."

(Really, I'm trying to avoid comparisons to present day political coverage, but the parallels are running pretty thick. Next thing you know somebody is going to demand to see Abrams' birth certificate.)

Thenature of the franchise requires not just a person who can handle drama, but also have a light comedic touch. To have an eye for performance and an ear for dialogue. Be able to shepherd (along with the producer) a well-structured and strong script. Have an eye for action set pieces and an ability to block action so that while it feels raw and chaotic, still have it be coherent to the viewer. Have good enough taste to surround himself with quality people in the production design or else be able to get quality work if he's not.
Sounds like JJ Abrams.

Also, wouldn't these be the qualities you would want in a director for any big tentpole movie?

It's perfectly ok to be totally happy with Abrams.

I'm saying, 'if'. IF we had our choice of directors to make our own individual 'perfect Trek movie', who would it be, and for what reasons. Particularly when it comes to the people who don't like the Abrams version.

I'm genuinely curious - this is not an excuse to snark.

Director's qualifications re: Tentpole movies - I agree. That's what is generally asked of these directors, but they have strengths and weaknesses in each department and in varying degrees. Bay, for instance, is a huge tentpole kinda director, but there is general consensus that his story/drama skills somewhat trail his ability to imagine spectacle, etc etc.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

So who would your 'Dream Director' be?

Me :D

But since I might not be available at the time due to other commitments :vulcan:, I say stick with JJ.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

A few threads here got me thinking - with the revivication of Star Trek successfully well under way ( arguments about that statement will be for another thread) - who would I imagine to be the perfect director to tackle the next installment?

Abrams has clearly polarized the fanbase, and while I think he did an admirable job with the actors/characters, there are surely other departments which could stand some improvement.

I'm not sure I would consider am 84% to 16% split in favor of the new movie "polarizing."

(Really, I'm trying to avoid comparisons to present day political coverage, but the parallels are running pretty thick. Next thing you know somebody is going to demand to see Abrams' birth certificate.)

Thenature of the franchise requires not just a person who can handle drama, but also have a light comedic touch. To have an eye for performance and an ear for dialogue. Be able to shepherd (along with the producer) a well-structured and strong script. Have an eye for action set pieces and an ability to block action so that while it feels raw and chaotic, still have it be coherent to the viewer. Have good enough taste to surround himself with quality people in the production design or else be able to get quality work if he's not.
Sounds like JJ Abrams.

Also, wouldn't these be the qualities you would want in a director for any big tentpole movie?

It's perfectly ok to be totally happy with Abrams.

I'm saying, 'if'. IF we had our choice of directors to make our own individual 'perfect Trek movie', who would it be, and for what reasons. Particularly when it comes to the people who don't like the Abrams version.

I'm genuinely curious - this is not an excuse to snark.

Director's qualifications re: Tentpole movies - I agree. That's what is generally asked of these directors, but they have strengths and weaknesses in each department and in varying degrees. Bay, for instance, is a huge tentpole kinda director, but there is general consensus that his story/drama skills somewhat trail his ability to imagine spectacle, etc etc.

Honestly, I'd still say J.J. Abrams. No Star Trek movie has done for me what this one has done, and it makes me feel ecstatic. I have seen this movie twice, going in for a third this week and who knows, maybe a matinee next week. I only see movies once. Just once. This is unprecedented for me.

J.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

I would go with Abrams, also. To agree with what's been posted above about how he can handle the drama and light humor and so on, there is also a chemistry with Abrams, Orci, Lindelof and their team that is really a good one.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

Abrams, just replace the writers:D
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

JJ was good for me, I loved his work on MI3 (the only one that felt like MI). But for the sake of the argument, if it HAD to be someone else, I would like Ridley Scott (Alien, Blade Runner, ...) first, James Cameron (Terminator, Aliens) second.
 
Re: OK, Star Trek cinephiles - Who would your Dream Director be for XI

Since 1/4 of the people who saw Trek XI claimed that Abrams was a primary reason for their going, I hope they keep Abrams. The only other good option would be a very big name (Spielberg, for example) but I wouldn't trust them to do as good a job.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top