• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Should we name future spacecraft after sci fi ships?

Docbrown777

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
In the future should the government start naming ships after science fiction ships? There are a bunch to choose from thus far.

Enterprise (obviously)
Millenium Falcon
Galactica
etc?

I started thinking about this based on the recent aircraft carrier naming threads. NASA(or some future world space agency) needs to have a naming guide. What better then a list of some of the most notable fictional ships humans have written about?
 
That brings up one point...

The real aircraft carrier Enterprise (CVN-65) is due to be decommissioned in a few years. I would hope that the Navy would have a replacement vessel waiting. We should always have a ship named Enterprise in the fleet...
 
Well, we tried to get the new node named after Serenity (or Colbert lol), but NASA decided to ignore their own poll and just name the node what they wanted. Therefore, I doubt they'll be up for that. Perhaps we should be contacting the ESA to do it.
 
Human history is filled with cool names. There's no need to go to sci-fi literature for this.
 
^^ And no need not to.

Since a lot of fictional spaceships were named after real ships (Enterprise, Discovery et cetera), or took their names from sources that future ships are likely to use (Grissom, Leonov et cetera), or took their names from fictional characters (Snoopy, Caspar et cetera), it's likely that future spaceships will be named after fictional spaceships. Additionally, the Spaceguard Survey Report was named after a fictional organization in ACC's Rendezvous With Rama, so there is plenty of precedent for life imitating Art.
 
Any future Moon or Mars mission is begging to have its command and landing craft named Wallace and Gromit. It is inevitable. :hugegrin:
 
Where is the Space Shuttle Enterprise anyway? Isn't it a well known fact that it was so named to honour Star Trek but yet they never sent it into Space? Is it still sitting somewhere collecting dust and can't it be configured to take one flight into orbit?
 
It was a test article and is now located at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum. NASA made design changes after it was built and it was deemed too expensive to refit the Enterprise with those changes.
 
Well, we tried to get the new node named after Serenity (or Colbert lol), but NASA decided to ignore their own poll and just name the node what they wanted. Therefore, I doubt they'll be up for that. Perhaps we should be contacting the ESA to do it.

And what's up with that anyways?! Like we aren't good enough to name our own stuff, they should have used Serenity at least. They took the time to ask us, instead they just wasted our time and dreams.
 
We could name our spacecraft after anything. I'd like to see as much creativity go into those names as people put into their fishing boats.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top