Making fun of people for being exactly the same as you is what the internet was made for.
That and porn.
As for the site, it's just a movie relax. None of it is real.
It's ''fans'' like this, that make trekkie's LOOK bad!
- Thread starter miraclefan
- Start date
That and porn.
As for the site, it's just a movie relax. None of it is real.
Yeah, he's really starting to lose it, I'm sorry to say.
Heaven forfend a Star Trek fan take Star Trek remotely seriously.
Okay - so I defended him initially - then I came across this:
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/stxi_continuity.htm
Which IMHO is even worse.
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/stxi_continuity.htm
Which IMHO is even worse.
Well there is a difference between taking something seriously and trying to explain why Klingon's head ridges change between episodes.
Something you guys are overlooking.
The page we've been shown is only one of an entire section on that website, in which ALL inconsistencies in ALL of Trek are listed.
If you click on the link at the bottom of the page, it takes you to the mainpage for the "inconsistencies" section, where the following is said-
"No one can expect that everything in 700 episodes and ten movies is logically correct and complies with everything that has been shown elsewhere in Star Trek. Inconsistencies are inevitable. Among them are rather insignificant errors during the shooting such as missing rank pips that reappear only a few seconds later. A number of more general blunders, however, require and deserve further consideration. Note that many if not most of the following are "light-hearted" inconsistencies. I may have come up with explanations but unless otherwise stated I don't insist on them being the only possible truth. Please keep that in mind before contacting me about errors, negligences or omissions."
He (she?) isn't attacking the movie, but is just doing what's been done with all the rest of Trek.
if anything, this movie being INCLUDED now is a sign of it having been ACCEPTED, not attacked.
The page we've been shown is only one of an entire section on that website, in which ALL inconsistencies in ALL of Trek are listed.
If you click on the link at the bottom of the page, it takes you to the mainpage for the "inconsistencies" section, where the following is said-
"No one can expect that everything in 700 episodes and ten movies is logically correct and complies with everything that has been shown elsewhere in Star Trek. Inconsistencies are inevitable. Among them are rather insignificant errors during the shooting such as missing rank pips that reappear only a few seconds later. A number of more general blunders, however, require and deserve further consideration. Note that many if not most of the following are "light-hearted" inconsistencies. I may have come up with explanations but unless otherwise stated I don't insist on them being the only possible truth. Please keep that in mind before contacting me about errors, negligences or omissions."
He (she?) isn't attacking the movie, but is just doing what's been done with all the rest of Trek.
if anything, this movie being INCLUDED now is a sign of it having been ACCEPTED, not attacked.
i think this sums up the thread pretty well http://www.spacecast.com/Blogs/Post.aspx?PostID=562
but in the larger context of people loving and hating this movie.
I think it all comes down to this inherent need on the part of the "geek" to be accepted by the more cooler jocks.
but in the larger context of people loving and hating this movie.
I think it all comes down to this inherent need on the part of the "geek" to be accepted by the more cooler jocks.
*Right click - save*
I'm Sorry, but this guy needs a LIFE! http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/inconsistencies-trekxi.htm I mean COME ON MAN! it's just a M.O.V.I.E.It's people like this guy that helped kill enterprise. And he STILL says the NU-E is only 300 m.
Oh my God! That's taking things a bit too far, imho. However I do recognize and respect the fact that some folks are psychologically "wired" a bit differently than others.
I hope the author is not one to iron the Starfleet uniform in preparation for jury duty.
I read the entire page. It was interesting. A lot of the inconsistencies I picked up in the movie myself.
A couple I noticed right away in the theatre:
A couple I noticed right away in the theatre:
- The near instant travel from Vulcan to Earth.
- The Narada just happening to come out of it's time vortex right on top of the Kelvin.
- The lack of surprise from Capt Robau upon meeting the Romulans.
- The multiple warp cores being ejected when there should only be one.
- The enormous shuttle bay size.
- The Kelvin carrying 800 crew. That's a lot for a scout ship.
- Engineering made zero sense to me. All we saw was a maze of pipes. We never even saw the warp core.
All Seeing Eye
Admiral
Ya know what really bakes my noodle, when people try to argue that he shouldn't have weapons on his ship. 
He's a Romulan for starters and his ship carries shipments of the rare and precious isotope Decalithium which any would be pirate might wanna get their hands on. We see him fire missile/torpedos but no beam weapons so technically he isn't armed to the teeth like a starship is he's only got missiles/torps.
He's a Romulan for starters and his ship carries shipments of the rare and precious isotope Decalithium which any would be pirate might wanna get their hands on. We see him fire missile/torpedos but no beam weapons so technically he isn't armed to the teeth like a starship is he's only got missiles/torps.
Well, sort of. On the other pages, Bernd doesn't generally include snarky and condescending "funny" graphics. That's reserved for the new movie and the NX-01 on Enterprise, which got quite the (since removed) excoriation on that site. So it's pretty clear how he feels about Trek XI.
Oh Lordie, I remember that.
"The design lineage is all wrong! Just look at those nacelles! Look! Looook!! Do they think we're stupid?!"
I'm Sorry, but this guy needs a LIFE! http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/inconsistencies-trekxi.htm I mean COME ON MAN! it's just a M.O.V.I.E.
Reads like it could've been written by a number of inmates here.
My thoughts exactly.
Makes me laugh when I read some of the social outcasts here dissing others of their kind.
Hey, just because I have no social life doesn't mean that...I mean, just because I spend all my time alone...look, I may not have a girl...um...
You shut up!
(...I knew I was going to be glad 'Bonz added that smiley.
)
Has anyone ever tried to explain why Saavik looks completely different in Trek III than Trek II?
Similar threads
