Re: Come on people - am I the only fan who can't drink Abrams' Cool Ai
I agree the TWoK was about revenge and explored the human condition from the revenge angle, but this film wasn't much "less deep" than TWoK, and it certainly wasn't "lees deep" than FC.
All three films (TWoK, FC, and this film) were enjoyable simply because it was fun to watch the characters work with each other and talk to each other in sharp, witty dialog.
I'll even throw TVH into the mix. Sure TVH had the "save the whales" angle -- but it, too, was more of a "buddy film" than it was an environmental parable.
I suppose I never saw the revenge angle as a moral understory. "Revenge" is one of those human nature things that exist in just about every story ever made.The Wrath of Khan and First Contact both had a "moral understory" about revenge, of sorts. This film was also largely driven by revenge, but it wasn't as heavy-handed. The "these-guys-are-destined-for-greatness" theme sort of took over.Moral understories are overrated and not as important to "good Star Trek" as much as people seem to think, especially in the films -- for example, what was TWoK's moral message? What about FC?
Star Trek (especially TOS) is first and foremost a character-driven story, not a plot driven one. There certainly were some allegorical episodes, but even most of those allegories were simply a vehicle that allowed the characters to interact with each other.
I agree the TWoK was about revenge and explored the human condition from the revenge angle, but this film wasn't much "less deep" than TWoK, and it certainly wasn't "lees deep" than FC.
All three films (TWoK, FC, and this film) were enjoyable simply because it was fun to watch the characters work with each other and talk to each other in sharp, witty dialog.
I'll even throw TVH into the mix. Sure TVH had the "save the whales" angle -- but it, too, was more of a "buddy film" than it was an environmental parable.