All your base are belong to us.
I think that Star Trek would be better served by catering to their base.
No. If that worked then Serenity would have been a monster hit.I can't think of a rational reason for the producers to want fewer people to see the film. If you can, I'd like to hear it.If I give you an honest answer, some here will claim that I am trolling by posting things just to rile up the majority who love the new movie.
So mind if I wait awhile on that?
Fine.
I think one of the biggest mistakes made with Star Trek through over the last decade or so has been the attempt to BROADEN the base.
Both with series and movies.
I think that Star Trek would be better served by catering to their base.
Blockbuster movies don't get that way by getting 50 million people to see the movie.
They get that way by getting 15 million people to see the movie over and over again.
In short rather than "expanding" the base, Paramount would be better served by "stimulating" their base and getting die hard Trek fans to the movie multiple times.
Ever since The Undiscovered Country, it seems that the promotions were more "niche" oriented. Specials airing at the same time as television Trek episodes. Specials promoting the movies with older stars.
"Expanding the base" is the same thing as "trying to get more people into the theater". You're trying to argue both sides.The idea that Star Trek hasn't tried to expand the base is ridiculous.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.